What's new

'No question of India joining NPT as non-nuclear weapon state'

sree45

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Feb 28, 2013
Messages
1,731
Reaction score
1
Country
India
Location
India
New York: India has made it clear that there is no question of it joining the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) as a non-nuclear weapon state while reaffirming its commitment to check further proliferation of atomic weapons.

India also reiterated its stand of "no first use" of nuclear weapons and not targeting non-nuclear weapons states and offered to enter into agreements incorporating the two principles.

"As a responsible nuclear power India has a policy of credible minimum deterrence based on a No First Use posture and non-use of nuclear weapons against non- nuclear weapon states," Ambassador DB Venkatesh Varma said.

Varma, India's Permanent Representative to the Conference on Disarmament, was speaking at a meeting of the UN General Assembly Committee on Disarmament and International Peace here on Monday.

"We are prepared to covert these into bilateral or multilateral legally binding arrangements," he said.



While New Delhi is "unwavering in its commitment to universal, non-discriminatory, verifiable nuclear disarmament," he said, "there is no question of India joining the NPT as a non-nuclear weapon state."

Joining NPT as a non-nuclear weapons state would require India unilaterally giving up its nuclear weapons.

India considers NPT as the last vestige of apartheid in the international system, granting as it does to five-countries (US, UK, China, France and Russia) the right to be nuclear-weapons state while denying the same right to others. The NPT came into force in 1970.

"India is committed to working with the international community to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons and their means of delivery," he said.

Varma said nuclear disarmament can be achieved through a step-by-step process underwritten by a universal commitment and an agreed global and non-discriminatory multilateral framework.

"We have called for a meaningful dialogue among all states possessing nuclear weapons to build trust and confidence and for reducing the salience of nuclear weapons in international affairs and security doctrines," he said.

On another matter affecting the restriction of nuclear weapons, he offered India's qualified support to the Fissile Material Cutoff Treaty (FMCT) negotiations.

"Without prejudice to the priority we attach to nuclear disarmament, we support the negotiation in the Conference on Disarmament of an FMCT that meets India's national security interests," he said.

Such a treaty would stop the making of materials that could be used in nuclear weapons.

Reintroducing a draft resolution on a Convention on the Prohibition of the Use of Nuclear Weapons, he criticised countries with nuclear weapons coverage that have repeatedly voted against the proposed measure since it was first introduced in 1982.

He regretted "that a sizeable minority of member states - some of them nuclear weapon states, some with nuclear weapons stationed on their soil and others with alliance partnerships underwritten by policies of first use of nuclear weapons - have voted against this resolution."

And "for reasons that are difficult to understand, some member states which are today in the forefront of efforts to highlight the humanitarian impact of use of nuclear weapons have also voted against this resolution".

Reflecting the concern of the international community to the dangers from terrorists, Varma said India will be introducing again a draft resolution on "measures to prevent terrorists from acquiring weapons of mass destruction".

"We believe that increasing restraints on use of nuclear weapons would reduce the probability of their use - whether deliberate, unintentional or accidental and this process could contribute to the progressive de- legitimisation of nuclear weapons, an essential step for their eventual elimination, as was achieved for chemical and biological weapons," he said.

He emphasised the importance that discussions be inclusive with the participation of all states including the nuclear powers.

"In terms of substance, they should do no harm to the non-proliferation regime or impede genuine progress towards the goal of nuclear disarmament. In terms of process, they should do no harm to the established disarmament machinery," Varma said.

'No question of India joining NPT as non-nuclear weapon state' | Zee News
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

How long do you think before India joins NPT as a "Nuclear weapons state"?
 
How long do you think before India joins NPT as a "Nuclear weapons state"?

Doesn't matter anymore, because we have the same rights as a non nuclear NPT state anyway. We can buy Uranium on the global market, and there are many countries eager to sell us. So why should we bother to be on the NPT list anyway?
 
Doesn't matter anymore, because we have the same rights as a non nuclear NPT state anyway. We can buy Uranium on the global market, and there are many countries eager to sell us. So why should we bother to be on the NPT list anyway?

Wouldn't joining the NPT make India's entry into MTCR, NSG, Aus grp, Wasenaar grp easy?
 
If we join as nuclear state good, we we don't not bad. Nothing changes.
 
Wouldn't joining the NPT make India's entry into MTCR, NSG, Aus grp, Wasenaar grp easy?
MTCR would still applyto the signatories - nobody can sell us missiles with a range greater than 300 kms. That's OK anyway, because we will be self sufficient in missiles pretty soon.

NSG has already made an exception to sell us Uranium - what more do we need?
 
MTCR would still applyto the signatories - nobody can sell us missiles with a range greater than 300 kms. That's OK anyway, because we will be self sufficient in missiles pretty soon.

NSG has already made an exception to sell us Uranium - what more do we need?

Dual-use technologies?
 
MTCR would still applyto the signatories

You can create & ratify rules according to your needs once you are a member. That's how the US is able
to sell Tomahawk TLAMs & Trident-II SLBMs to UK which have several thousand km range and high tech.
 
You can create & ratify rules according to your needs once you are a member. That's how the US is able
to sell Tomahawk TLAMs & Trident-II SLBMs to UK which have several thousand km range and high tech.
Actually, those were sold before the MTCR regime came into existence. It was in the mid 80s that the MTCR agreements were hastily put in place, when China was about to sell IRBMs to certain middle easter states.
 
Actually, those were sold before the MTCR regime came into existence. It was in the mid 80s that the MTCR agreements were hastily put in place, when China was about to sell IRBMs to certain middle easter states.

Were Tomahawk Block-IV and Trident-II D5 developed before 80s? No. Yet these advanced versions were still transferred
without a hassle. Infact a Trident-replacement program is currently underway in UK, where again the US will provide ICBM-ranged missiles without any problem.
 
Were Tomahawk Block-IV and Trident-II D5 developed before 80s? No. Yet these advanced versions were still transferred
without a hassle. Infact a Trident-replacement program is currently underway in UK, where again the US will provide ICBM-ranged missiles without any problem.

Trident-II purchase agreement was signed in 1982, between Thatcher and Reagan. That was before MTCR came into existence. There is a D5LEP program underway to extend the life of the existing missiles to 2042. But no nuclear ballistic missiles were sold to Britain after that.

The trident replacement program is for the replacement of the submarines, not the missiles. (Confusingly, both the missile and the entire nuclear deterrence system are named "trident" in Britain.) The missiles will undergo a life extension program and serve till 2042, beyond which UK would develop its own missiles. There are no plans to sell long ranged nuclear tipped missiles to UK.

Successor to the UK Trident system - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

When signed in 1987, the MTCR treaty only spoke about nuclear capable delivery systems; in 1992, it was expanded to include any long range systems, inclusing cruise missiles and UAVs.

MTCR is not a legally binding treaty, just an agreement between long ranged missile producing nations. The terms of the agreement do not prohibit the sale of non nuclear missiles completely - some transfers are deemed acceptable, if there are strong guarantees that the missiles will only be used for the stated purpose, and no efforts for re-export would be made. Nobody had any complaints when US sold Tomahawks to UK, since UK is not an imminent threat to any third country, and Americans love the Brits anyway.

Note that Britain and France have sold Stormshadow/Scalp-EG to Saudi and UAE (black shaheen), claiming that the range is only 250 km - the unmentioned footnote being that that is the range at a flight altitude of 30 meters, and that at higher altitudes, the range is far greater. Saudi and UAE were purchasing billions of euros worth of British and French aircrafts, so they were willing to overlook the violation of the MTCR agreement.
 
india please lay down nuclear weapons its good for world peace :D
 

Back
Top Bottom