Miltant camps still in Bangladesh

[eastwatch]

Militant camps still in Bangladesh, claims Tripura chief minister -
bdnews24.com

Militant camps still in Bangladesh, claims Tripura chief minister
Agartala correspondent, bdnews24.com

Published: 2014-09-16 09:43:09.0 BdST Updated: 2014-09-16 10:33:11.0 BdST

• 
  
  RAB’s operation on Jun 4, 2014 yielded arms at the seven bunkers atop hillocks inside Satchharhi jungles of Habiganj, about three km from the Indian border in Tripura. Photo: asif mahmud ove/ bdnews24.com

Manik Sarkar (File Photo)

He said this while addressing a large gathering of the elite Tripura State Rifles (TSR) personnel and the members of their families at a blood, eye, and body donation programme at the battalion headquarters in Tripura's Agartala.

Sarkar has been praising the present government in Bangladesh, saying it is friendly towards India and has acted against Northeast Indian militant groups using Bangladesh territory as their launching pad.

But he added several camps of Tripura militants still existed across the border.

“The problem of insurgency has not yet been entirely solved. They have been weakened and cornered, but not totally uprooted.”

He said 19 to 20 camps still existed in Bangladesh. Of the two Tripura militant groups - NLFT and the Tiger Force – the former was still ran camps in Bangladesh, though with a depleting cadre strength.

According to him, there were no records any camp of the banned All Tripura Tiger Force (ATTF) in Bangladesh at present.

The Chief Minister said the militants were trying to achieve a revival in Tripura and hamper development work.

Sarkar praised the TSR for its counter-insurgency operations in the state.

Tripura has an 857-km border with Bangladesh, of which more than 90 percent has been already fenced.

 

[eastwatch]

It is better for India to give back freedom to its NE colonies including Tripura. Otherwise, these states will keep on destabilizing our own country. NE does not really belong to India, it never did. NE is a broken glass, never to be put back together and brought back to the Indian fold.

 

[GR!FF!N]

It is better for India to give back freedom to its NE colonies including Tripura. Otherwise, these states will keep on destabilizing our own country. NE does not really belong to India, it never did. NE is a broken glass, never to be put back together and brought back to the Indian fold.

LOL..its true.NE was never with India(Country India) before 1947.it was always independent and came under first Burmese and then British Empire.but then again,what was BD before 1947???just a part of Bengal Province of British India.same was NE Indian States.we integrated it,and we're inviting you guys too.. we'll mean no harm to the Lungi Community.

 

[eastwatch]

LOL..its true.NE was never with India(Country India) before 1947.it was always independent and came under first Burmese and then British Empire.but then again,what was BD before 1947???just a part of Bengal Province of British India.same was NE Indian States.we integrated it,and we're inviting you guys too.. we'll mean no harm to the Lungi Community.

Can there be any parallel between Sube Bangal and an occupied NE? Sube Bangal was the dominant force in the pre-British eastern India. Even Gangaridi and Pataliputra before that ruled over entire north India.

Where as NE could not be fully occupied or integrated by Bengal except western Assam. If Bengal could not occupy NE, then how come it becomes a part of India after over passing the territory of BD? In short, NE has been forced to remain a colony of India after 1947, a British legacy.

 

[GR!FF!N]

Can there be any parallel between Sube Bangal and an occupied NE? Sube Bangal was the dominant force in the pre-British eastern India. Even Gangaridi and Pataliputra before that ruled over entire north India.

Where as NE could not be fully occupied or integrated by Bengal except western Assam. If Bengal could not occupy NE, then how come it becomes a part of India after over passing the territory of BD? In short, NE has been forced to remain a colony of India after 1947, a British legacy.

Suba Bengal???Occupied NE??a colony???what are you smoking???

Bangladesh is Indian colony,you can say that.North East is part of India.NE States were integrated politically just like other parts of India.only difference is they gained "Statehood" a bit later.

read this,and please forget whatever $h!tty history you've learnt .....

www.ide.go.jp/English/Publish/Download/Jrp/pdf/133_3.pdf

and another point,Indian Union is not based on whatever territory some states have captured 200 years ago.entire Indian Subcontinent has faced massive change of boundaries.Various Indian Empires was spread from Afghanistan to the next of Burma.we integrated these lands politically to create both Pakistan and India.

 

[eastwatch]

Suba Bengal???Occupied NE??a colony???what are you smoking???

Bangladesh is Indian colony,you can say that.North East is part of India.NE States were integrated politically just like other parts of India.only difference is they gained "Statehood" a bit later.

read this,and please forget whatever $h!tty history you've learnt .....

www.ide.go.jp/English/Publish/Download/Jrp/pdf/133_3.pdf

and another point,Indian Union is not based on whatever territory some states have captured 200 years ago.entire Indian Subcontinent has faced massive change of boundaries.Various Indian Empires was spread from Afghanistan to the next of Burma.we integrated these lands politically to create both Pakistan and India.

BD is Indian territory, my balls? I am not a Jamaati. Come and prove your point. To prove that the entire north India was a colony of Bengal you have to read the history.

Shame on you Indians!!! Forgetting history and talking big here. Well, this is your national pass time.

 

[asad71]

MSS, ISI and DGFI must cooperate to aid the NE freedom-fighters.

 

[kaykay]

MSS, ISI and DGFI must cooperate to aid the NE freedom-fighters.

Well they are busy saving their own lands from jihadis. LOLs but anyway reality is that all these militant groups are weaken and damaged beyond repair.

 

[extra terrestrial]

LOL..its true.NE was never with India(Country India) before 1947.it was always independent and came under first Burmese and then British Empire.but then again,what was BD before 1947???just a part of Bengal Province of British India.same was NE Indian States.we integrated it,and we're inviting you guys too.. we'll mean no harm to the Lungi Community.

Well, it's not you but the British who integrated those states and formed an artificial nation called India. Before the arrival of British empire, a South Indian wouldn't even know the difference between a Pujabi and a Bihari!

As for North East, clearly it doesn't belong to India. Political integration is not everything, we still see those racist attacks against the North Easterners by the mainland Indians.

Moreover, when a country (read India) needs the help of outsiders (read Bangladesh) to control a part (read North East) of its territory, be it the insurgencies or the transit, it explicitly proves that "the part" is bound to be a separate entity.

Unless the North East is granted independence, those insurgencies will remain an inextricable issue of this region.

 

[dray]

It is better for India to give back freedom to its NE colonies including Tripura. Otherwise, these states will keep on destabilizing our own country. NE does not really belong to India, it never did. NE is a broken glass, never to be put back together and brought back to the Indian fold.

Well, it's not you but the British who integrated those states and formed an artificial nation called India. Before the arrival of British empire, a South Indian wouldn't even know the difference between a Pujabi and a Bihari!

As for North East, clearly it doesn't belong to India. Political integration is not everything, we still see those racist attacks against the North Easterners by the mainland Indians.

Moreover, when a country (read India) needs the help of outsiders (read Bangladesh) to control a part (read North East) of its territory, be it the insurgencies or the transit, it explicitly proves that "the part" is bound to be a separate entity.

Unless the North East is granted independence, those insurgencies will remain an inextricable issue of this region.

Every part of India is already free and part of a great democratic country that we, the people of India have created, a handful of terrorists cannot change that.

You should really consider giving freedom to the Chittagong and should also consider giving a separate land to the minorities instead of killing them and driving them out of their ancestral land.

MSS, ISI and DGFI must cooperate to aid the NE freedom-fighters.

Go ahead and undo your country.

 

[Spring Onion]

And we thought India had closed down those terror camps after 71.

 

[DARIUS]

I think it wouldn't be an issue at all for the West Bengal Armed police to take over the whole of Bangladesh in 3 days time!!!

 

[asad71]

And we thought India had closed down those terror camps after 71.

Roots of "Terrorism" lies in Indian held NE.

I think it wouldn't be an issue at all for the West Bengal Armed police to take over the whole of Bangladesh in 3 days time!!!

Khalsa-ji! You've forgotten all too early what they did to you in three days of 1984.

 

[GR!FF!N]

BD is Indian territory, my balls? I am not a Jamaati. Come and prove your point. To prove that the entire north India was a colony of Bengal you have to read the history.

Shame on you Indians!!! Forgetting history and talking big here. Well, this is your national pass time.

see,thats why I say,never poke us,or we'll poke you back..you claimed "North East States" as colony,Bengal never claimed it and sh!t.but what was Bangladesh before became part of a territory of British Empire's Bengal Province??merely a part of Mughal Empire.so on that logic,BD should be part of India,if NE is not...

Claiming NE as "Colony",you crossed the threshold.I simply replied based on your version of history.and never claimed Bengal captured NE..I stated that it was part of British India's Bengal Province.but also,there was different Assam Province which came into existence later on.

Bengal Presidency - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[GR!FF!N]

Well, it's not you but the British who integrated those states and formed an artificial nation called India. Before the arrival of British empire, a South Indian wouldn't even know the difference between a Pujabi and a Bihari!

As for North East, clearly it doesn't belong to India. Political integration is not everything, we still see those racist attacks against the North Easterners by the mainland Indians.

Moreover, when a country (read India) needs the help of outsiders (read Bangladesh) to control a part (read North East) of its territory, be it the insurgencies or the transit, it explicitly proves that "the part" is bound to be a separate entity.

Unless the North East is granted independence, those insurgencies will remain an inextricable issue of this region.

and did I state something else??read my post again.I said,after 1947,both India and Pakistan integrated those princely states and various provinces to make their own country.and who told you that North East India is not part of India??on what basis??

and now,don't claim some fancy words.you claimed that india needs some foreign country,i.e. Bangladesh to keep our control over N-E,which is wrong.we said to destroy the rebel bases on BD.as a responsible country,BD is doing what it is supposed to do.thats how international diplomacy works.or else,every country had to take their last resort,which is war to sort out this kind of problem.transborder crime is a quite common matter now.

about attack,they're more enraged about illegal bangladeshis than biharis or others.I think you took that into consideration.that makes BD in a poor light as if BDeshis are inciting violence on Indian lands by illegally occupying lands.

about granting independence,I can show you how these claims die.

MNF...

Mizo National Front - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

they declared independence,killed some soldiers.then IAF resorted to bomb them,only one ocurance when IAF bombed indian territory.

now,they're a main stream party,after signing Peace Accord..

most of the terrorism is already died.some fractions make some bombing once or twice in a year,most of the time to scare people and getting their "Hissa".it is far far more peaceful and developed than your own country.

those aren't major issue now.major issue in N-E is now illegal migrants.