What's new

Midget Submarines

The SC

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 13, 2012
Messages
32,233
Reaction score
21
Country
Canada
Location
Canada
Piranhas coming back

img5443.jpg



Piranha-T SSW can attack targets at shallow depths.

Former Chief of Operations of the Russian Navy General Staff Vice Admiral Victor Patrushev has recently offered an opinion that diesel-electric midget submarines (SSW) are the best choice for defending Russia’s national interests in the Baltic, the Black and the Caspian seas. «Such midget submarine fleets could operate off the Kurils or anywhere else where it is necessary to ensure security with the help of small but efficient means during the threat period.»

Alexander MOZGOVOY

What submarines was the admiral talking about? And why did the former Chief of Operations, who is perfectly aware of the environment in the Russian territorial waters, advocate such submarines?

The Admiralty Shipyards built two Project 865 Piranha special-purpose midget submarines (SSW) (Losos class under the NATO classification) developed by the St. Petersburg-based MalaТhite Marine Engineering Bureau for the Soviet Navy in the late 1980s. These subs boasting a full submerged displacement of 319 t and a crew of three turned out to be extremely efficient. They featured low physical fields, good maneuverability, considerable diving depths (200 m), and easy handling. The subs were armed with two torpedoes and mines in containers and were capable of carrying up to six frogmen. Unfortunately, these submarines were not in demand in the post-Soviet Russia, which plunged into economic and political turmoil. At first they were mothballed and later on scrapped (in 1999).

img5444.jpg


Project 865 Piranha SSW



However, Malachite designers have kept on working on midget submarines and developed a whole range of small-size subs with a displacement of 130 to 1,000 t.

While boasting small dimensions, SSWs can carry various weapons including torpedoes and mines, while larger subs, such as P-550s, P-650s and P-750s, can be armed with Club-S or BRAHMOS submarine-launched «submarine-to-ship» and «submarine-to-surface» cruise missiles. In other words, under certain circumstances they can perform strategic missions. State-of-the-art electronics enable SSWs to promptly detect targets and attack the enemy well in advance. Low noise and electromagnetic levels ensure their extraordinary stealth.

The high maneuverability is provided by the low-noise steerable shrouded propeller and the backup propulsion plant comprising two outboard steering columns, which enable the subs to literally spin on the same spot.

Another crucial feature, inherent in midget submarines, consists in their highly automated battle management and operation. It is not just a random capability. Malachite is the world leader in integrated automation of submarines. SSWs are manned by combat crews of only four to nine people who operate in quite comfortable conditions. In addition to the organic crew, a midget submarine can carry up to six fully equipped frogmen.

Piranha-family SSWs can be equipped with Air-Independent Propulsion (AIP) fuel cell modules that significantly boost their submerged range. This system deserves a special mention. It was for Piranha-family submarines that the St. Petersburg-based Special Boiler Design Bureau developed the 130-kW Kristall-20 AIP fuel cell power plant in the late 1980s. The Kristall-20 AIP power plant, incorporating electrochemical generators, produces energy from hydrogen and oxygen. The efficiency factor of an AIP system with electrochemical generators amounts to 70-75 percent. Following extensive tests the Kristall-20 AIP system was fielded by the Russian Defense Ministry in 1991. However, the USSR broke up soon afterwards and neither innovative power plants nor submarines powered by such systems turned out to be in demand.

img5445.jpg


P-550 SSW



img5446.jpg


P-550 SSW fitted with the AIP fuel cell module turns into P-650E SSW.



img5447.jpg


P-750 SSW is armed with cruise missile launchers.



Meanwhile, according to experts from the Krylov Central Research Institute, submarines fitted with electrochemical generators possess a 450-percent greater submerged endurance than ordinary diesel-electric subs. AIP-equipped submarines are even superior to nuclear-powered subs in littoral areas as far as their cost-efficiency ratio is concerned. The latter fact is of paramount significance since modern naval strategies envision deployment of submarines in friendly or hostile offshore areas rather than in ocean lanes.

However, let’s get back to midget submarines developed by the Malachite Marine Engineering Bureau. They are primarily designed to operate in littoral areas, shallow waters, and off islands. However, they also boast quite good diving capabilities with their submergence depths ranging from 200 to 300 m. Their operational range varies from 2,000 to 3,000 nautical miles, and their endurance totals 20 to 30 days. For instance, the largest Piranha-family submarine, designated P-750, features the following basic specifications: a normal displacement of 960 t (1,060 t with the AIP fuel cell module), a length of 66.8 m (70.4 m), a hull diameter of 6.4 m, a full submerged speed of 17 knots, an operational range of 3,000 nautical miles, a submerged range of 280 (1,200) nautical miles, a diving depth of 300 m, an endurance of 30 days, and a crew of nine men plus six frogmen.

The P-750’s armament is of special interest. The sub is fitted with four 533mm torpedo tubes, which can launch both torpedoes and cruise missiles. The torpedo tubes cannot be reloaded at sea, but they are always ready for immediate single or salvo fire. The SSW is also armed with eight 400mm torpedo tubes firing ASW torpedoes. The P-750 is capable of carrying up to 24 seabed mines in outboard mine containers. Finally, the submarine can be equipped with up to four vertical launchers with cruise missiles, including Club-S 3M-14E missiles, designed to hit coast-based targets out to a range of up to 300 km. In other words, such subs can both repulse attacks from the sea and deliver strikes against the enemy territory. On the whole, the armament of the P-750 is superior to that of many larger submarines, which can hardly be included in the subcategory of «small-size» subs. For instance, the WWII-vintage Shchuka class Series III medium submarine had a submerged displacement of 705 t, a maximum diving depth of 90 m, a submerged speed of 2.8 knots, and a weapon load of ten torpedoes and a 45mm gun.

img5448.jpg


P-750 SSW



img5449.jpg


Andrasta coastal submarine for littoral operations



«These submarines (SSWs – editor’s note) can enter service with the Baltic Fleet, the Black Sea Fleet, and the Caspian Flotilla in the next two or three years. Four to six midget submarines of this kind can completely cut off such closed or semi-closed water areas as the Black, the Baltic, and the Caspian seas. Indeed, SSWs can discharge a wide range of tasks. They can covertly escort nuclear-powered submarines to their combat patrol areas and carry out reconnaissance missions in the Pacific Ocean and the Barents Sea. Such subs are virtually indispensable for setting up ASW defenses in littoral areas,» Vice Admiral Victor Patrushev emphasized.

img5451.jpg




Russian SSWs are superior to similar foreign rivals. The French DCNS shipbuilder displayed a model of the advanced Andrasta coastal submarine for littoral operations, named after the Celtic goddess of war whose name means victorious or invincible, at the Euronaval 2008 international naval show. The sub has a surface displacement of 855 t, a length of 49 m, a submerged speed of over 15 knots, a maximum diving depth of 200 m, an operational range of about 3,000 nautical miles, and a crew of 19 men. It is armed with torpedoes, antiship missiles, and mines. The project did not impress participants in the show. Actually, the project proper is not new. It is a slightly revised version of the SMX-23 submarine demonstrated at Euronaval 2006, which also failed to generate the interest of potential customers. As far as its characteristics and combat capabilities are concerned, the Andrasta submarine is considerably inferior to Malachite’s SSWs.

Russian midget submarines, on the contrary, attract attention of various navies from the Middle East and Southeast Asia. This trend was pointed out by head of Rosoboronexport’s Navy Department Oleg Azizov in an interview with National Defense. And it is quite justified. Russian submarines feature a great striking power and a low noise level, and are easy to operate. Last but not least, they are relatively cheap, which is an important factor given the global financial crunch.

img5450.jpg


P-550 SSW

National Defense / Navy
 
Last edited:
If I am not wrong then India wanted 5 midget sub's few years back for special operations. what happened to that?
 
True. You may find this conversation interesting:
AIP only submarine? in Submarines Forum
There are many AIP technologies; fuel cells German technology, sterling engines Scandinavian and Chinese technologies, French AIP and russian AIP, So the choice is vast and comparison is difficult.

USS X-1

X-1 was originally powered by a hydrogen peroxide/diesel engine and battery system, but an explosion of her hydrogen peroxide supply on 20 May 1957 resulted in the craft's modification to accept a diesel-electric drive. On 2 December 1957, X-1 was taken out of service and deactivated..

USS X-1 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
There are many AIP technologies; fuel cells German technology, sterling engines Scandinavian and Chinese technologies, French AIP and russian AIP, So the choice is vast and comparison is difficult.

From the link:

The current unclassified record for AIP operations without snorkeling is, to the best of my knowledge, 18 days, achieved by the German Type 212 submarine U32 in April 2013.* I think the idea of a submarine with PEM fuel cells and no diesel might make sense, but only for a small country which can make good use of submarines only capable of patrolling its local vicinity (for example its 200 nm economic exclusion zone). Any navy with a need to go further from its base would probably find an AIP-only submarine fleet inadequate, but might make some use of them mixed into a fleet with longer-ranging boats. There is really quite little R&D to do. PEM fuel cells are easy to aggregate in parallel because they output DC. An emergency diesel would add all of the problems of having diesel onboard (including keep the air clean of diesel fumes) so, in my opinion, redundant PEM cells would be a much better approach than an emergency diesel. Probably all of the air regulation (circulation, humidity, temperature, and filtration) found in nuclear subs would be required and that would draw substantial power, so not needing to filter diesel fumes would help. Smoking onboard would probably need to be prohibited too. Using LiFePO4 rather than lead-acid batteries would save a lot of space and weight that could be used for LH2 and LO2 -- and also eliminate another set of fumes to filter from the air.

Israel, Singapore, and South Korea would seem to be the obvious candidate countries that could make good use of such boats. They would be slow and have poor range, but they would be extremely difficult to detect. I would keep them small (maybe 500 to 600 tonnes), automate as much as reasonably possible, and arrange the torpedo tubes to be reloaded only in port. Since patrols would be limited to two to four weeks, it might be possible to eliminate the galley and rely on MREs. The lower the manning requirement and the lower the power consumption, the more practical the concept would become.


They seem quite sophisticated, but they remain at the project level or technology demonstrators for the moment.

凤凰周刊,为全球华人提供独立意见!
Aug 21st Thursday 2014

In order to improve the three-dimensional offshore combat forces strike capability, the South Korean navy is also being developed for offshore operations KSS-500A small submarine. Small submarine targets, low noise, suitable for use in coastal waters, the narrow strait to perform special tasks.

KSS-500A class submarine length 37 meters underwater displacement of 510 tons, the maximum dive depth of 250 meters. Sonar submarine equipped with a sound system and two with 533 mm torpedo tubes and can carry two "white shark" heavy wire-guided torpedoes and four "Blue Shark" lightweight torpedo boats. It is reported that the project has entered a critical system vendor selection phase, it is learned, the South Korean navy will build five submarines of this type.

"Tian An" incident, the South Korean Navy again will strengthen offshore combat forces as a focus point of the current development of the Navy, the gradual strengthening of the offshore combat forces to South Korea to maintain offshore safety provides a solid protection, but also to South Korea offshore operations forces more safely into the ocean .
 
Last edited:
From the link:

The current unclassified record for AIP operations without snorkeling is, to the best of my knowledge, 18 days, achieved by the German Type 212 submarine U32 in April 2013.* I think the idea of a submarine with PEM fuel cells and no diesel might make sense, but only for a small country which can make good use of submarines only capable of patrolling its local vicinity (for example its 200 nm economic exclusion zone). Any navy with a need to go further from its base would probably find an AIP-only submarine fleet inadequate, but might make some use of them mixed into a fleet with longer-ranging boats. There is really quite little R&D to do. PEM fuel cells are easy to aggregate in parallel because they output DC. An emergency diesel would add all of the problems of having diesel onboard (including keep the air clean of diesel fumes) so, in my opinion, redundant PEM cells would be a much better approach than an emergency diesel. Probably all of the air regulation (circulation, humidity, temperature, and filtration) found in nuclear subs would be required and that would draw substantial power, so not needing to filter diesel fumes would help. Smoking onboard would probably need to be prohibited too. Using LiFePO4 rather than lead-acid batteries would save a lot of space and weight that could be used for LH2 and LO2 -- and also eliminate another set of fumes to filter from the air.

Israel, Singapore, and South Korea would seem to be the obvious candidate countries that could make good use of such boats. They would be slow and have poor range, but they would be extremely difficult to detect. I would keep them small (maybe 500 to 600 tonnes), automate as much as reasonably possible, and arrange the torpedo tubes to be reloaded only in port. Since patrols would be limited to two to four weeks, it might be possible to eliminate the galley and rely on MREs. The lower the manning requirement and the lower the power consumption, the more practical the concept would become.




凤凰周刊,为全球华人提供独立意见!
Aug 21st Thursday 2014

In order to improve the three-dimensional offshore combat forces strike capability, the South Korean navy is also being developed for offshore operations KSS-500A small submarine. Small submarine targets, low noise, suitable for use in coastal waters, the narrow strait to perform special tasks.

KSS-500A class submarine length 37 meters underwater displacement of 510 tons, the maximum dive depth of 250 meters. Sonar submarine equipped with a sound system and two with 533 mm torpedo tubes and can carry two "white shark" heavy wire-guided torpedoes and four "Blue Shark" lightweight torpedo boats. It is reported that the project has entered a critical system vendor selection phase, it is learned, the South Korean navy will build five submarines of this type.

"Tian An" incident, the South Korean Navy again will strengthen offshore combat forces as a focus point of the current development of the Navy, the gradual strengthening of the offshore combat forces to South Korea to maintain offshore safety provides a solid protection, but also to South Korea offshore operations forces more safely into the ocean .

German/Italian Type-212 incorporates other sophisticated technologies in their anti-magnetic hulls, and sound suppression for every moving part in the submarine. They seem to have some unique fuel cell technology of their own, and not willing to share it fully, like in the case of Type-214. Italy offers them for sell but no one seem to have shown any interest, while Germany does not offer them for sell at all !? They seem very potent in shallow waters as well as in blue waters, so, go figure.

As for the South Korean midget submarines, I am not aware of any AIP technology to be used in them, and the problem was with the sophisticated propellant system they wanted to use on them.

By the way the new Iranian Fateh submarines will have fuel cells AIP, since -from memory I still remember that one of their admirals said that after Ghadir submarines , all the new one will have AIP technology based on fuel cells, and will be fitted with different (12) sensors, as well as state-of-the-art navigation and electronic technologies. We will wait till November for the official induction of the Fateh to see if all this is true, but personally, I do not have much doubt about it.

Iran to release Fateh, Besat submarines of own production

...Iran will equip four submarines (Fateh, Gadir, Tariq and a 1,200 ton Besat submarine) with underwater to surface missile launching systems for land targeting, Amiri said.

Amiri added that another addition that Iranian own made submarines will have fuel-cells.

Fuel-cells are electro-chemical energy converters. The advantage of a fuel-cell system aboard submarines is their air independent operation. They use an energy carrier (e.g. hydrogen or methanol) and an oxidation agent (liquid oxygen/ LOx), all of which are stored on board.

In the fuel cells hydrogen and oxygen are combined to water, thus giving off electricity (DC). Thanks to a very high efficiency, the amount of waste heat is very low. The electric energy produced is then fed to the submarine's main switchboard.
The amount of stored reactants combined with the excellent efficiency of the energy converting fuel cells provide the submarine with a zero-emission, pollution free alternative power source.

Iran to release Fateh, Besat submarines of own production - Trend.Az
 
Last edited:
Iranian Fateh Class Diesel-Electric Submarine

Iranian Navy has inducted new 600-ton domestically produced Fateh (Conqueror) diesel-electric submarine which is far more capable then the Ghadir class submarines.

The Fateh class submarine has a displacement of 527-ton when surfaced and 600-ton when submerged. This submarine has a operational diving depth is 200 meters while its maximum diving depth is 250 meters. The Fateh submarine has range of over 5000 kilometers when snorting at slow speed.

The Fateh submarine has a top speed of 11 knots (20 km/h) when surfaced and 14 knots (26 km/h) when the submarine is submerged. Submarine has sea endurance of over 35 days.

Iranian Fateh class submarine are fitted with 4 × 533 mm torpedo tubes and can carry upto 12 torpedoes ( 4 in the tubes and another 8 on the racks as reloads) or 24 naval mines for for anti-submarine (ASW) and anti-surface ship (ASuW) warfare. Much larger 1,000-ton Bethat class submarine is still underdevelopment.

Iranian Navy has inducted new 600-ton domestically produced Fateh (Conqueror) diesel-electric submarine which is far more capable then the Ghadir class submarines.

The Fateh class submarine has a displacement of 527-ton when surfaced and 600-ton when submerged. This submarine has a operational diving depth is 200 meters while its maximum diving depth is 250 meters. The Fateh submarine has range of over 5000 kilometers when snorting at slow speed.

The Fateh submarine has a top speed of 11 knots (20 km/h) when surfaced and 14 knots (26 km/h) when the submarine is submerged. Submarine has sea endurance of over 35 days.

Iranian Fateh class submarine are fitted with 4 × 533 mm torpedo tubes and can carry upto 12 torpedoes ( 4 in the tubes and another 8 on the racks as reloads) or 24 naval mines for for anti-submarine (ASW) and anti-surface ship (ASuW) warfare. Much larger 1,000-ton Bethat class submarine is still underdevelopment.

Iranian Fateh Class Diesel-Electric Submarine | Global Military Review
 
German/Italian Type-212 incorporate other sophisticated technologies in their anti-magnetic hulls, and sound suppression for every moving part in the submarine. They seem to have some unique fuel cell technology of their own, and not willing to share it fully, like in the case of Type-214. Italy offers them for sell but no one seem to have shown any interest, while Germany does not offer them for sell at all !? They seem very potent in shallow waters as well as in blue waters, so, go figure.

As for the South Korean midget submarines, I am not aware of any AIP technology to be used in them, and the problem was with the sophisticated propellant system they wanted to use on them.

By the way the new Iranian Fateh submarines will have fuel cells AIP, since -from memory I still remember that one of their admirals said that after Ghadir submarines , all the new one will have AIP technology based on fuel cells, and will be fitted with different (12) sensors, as well as state-of-the-art navigation and electronic technologies. We will wait till November for the official induction of the Fateh to see if all this is true, but personally, I do not have much doubt about it.

Iran to release Fateh, Besat submarines of own production

...Iran will equip four submarines (Fateh, Gadir, Tariq and a 1,200 ton Besat submarine) with underwater to surface missile launching systems for land targeting, Amiri said.

Amiri added that another addition that Iranian own made submarines will have fuel-cells.

Fuel-cells are electro-chemical energy converters. The advantage of a fuel-cell system aboard submarines is their air independent operation. They use an energy carrier (e.g. hydrogen or methanol) and an oxidation agent (liquid oxygen/ LOx), all of which are stored on board.

In the fuel cells hydrogen and oxygen are combined to water, thus giving off electricity (DC). Thanks to a very high efficiency, the amount of waste heat is very low. The electric energy produced is then fed to the submarine's main switchboard.
The amount of stored reactants combined with the excellent efficiency of the energy converting fuel cells provide the submarine with a zero-emission, pollution free alternative power source.

Iran to release Fateh, Besat submarines of own production - Trend.Az

Well it will be great to have Iran develop this AIP technology, hopefully they will share with other Muslim countries.

Not sure if Koreans are planning to develop their own AIP yet and if they are going to be used for KSS 500A, but this 500 ton sub will be a test bed for many tech to be used in ingenuously built KSS III to be finished by 2020:

SUBMARINES GAIN BUOYANCY IN ASIA-PACIFIC REGION | Asian Defence News Articles | Defence Review Asia
South Korea

The other major East Asian submarine power is South Korea, which employs advanced technology to counteract North Korea’s substantial underwater force. The Republic of Korea Navy (ROKN) has a three-phase programme to improve its subsurface forces, and the first step (KSS-I) involved nine license-produced Type 209/1200 (Chang Bogo) submarines. After an international competition, Sagem was selected last year to modernise them with Sigma 40XP inertial navigation systems.

These will eventually be replaced by the Type 214 under phase two (KSS-II). Three of these 1,860-ton Son Won-il-class boats were ordered as a first batch in 2000, with the first being commissioned in January 2008 and the third in December 2009. They are equipped with an Atlas Elektronik combat system and sonar suite. In addition Thales supply the SPHINX-D radar systems as well as X-band satcom terminals. In January 2007, the government announced it intended to buy six further Type 214 boats fitted with Siemens polymer electrolytic membrane (PEM) fuel cells that offer a three-week underwater endurance. Of this second KS-II batch, Daewoo Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering (DSME) should deliver the first and third vessels by 2014, with Hyundai Heavy Industries constructing the second boat.

However South Korea’s pursuit of domestically designed 3,000-ton KSS-III boats has been impacted by budgetary restrictions. Design work on the KS-III that will carry vertically launched Cheon Ryong cruise missiles commenced in 2007, although first delivery has been put back till 2020. Samsung Thales has been tasked with developing its combat system. Although no KS-III design details have emerged, last year South Korea disclosed pictures of the 510-ton KSS-500A due to replace Dolgorae-class midget submarines for special operations. Its standard complement is ten crewmen, with space for seven passengers. The KSS-500A mini-submarine could serve as a useful test-bed for the much larger KS-III, and up to five could be produced beginning this year.
 
In due time when Iran won't be sanctionned anymore, it will become a big arms and technology vendor to other muslim states, and even now if some chose to.

Good for SK, this will take time though. As technology test beds for KS-III, these must be very advanced mini submarines that SK will try to export to finance its KS-IIIs.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom