JF-17 with YJ83K ASM -Naval role

Discussion in 'Pakistan Navy' started by HAIDER, Nov 7, 2011.

Share This Page

  1. rcrmj
    Offline

    rcrmj SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2011
    Messages:
    4,528
    Ratings:
    +0 / 3,852 / -1
    JF-17 is the PAF version of F-16 for USAAF, atm it is the best option for pakistan, it gives them the strategic advantage to PAF over IAF (cost, logistic, technological and combat efficiency in war time)```but when you look at IAF, seriously its a complete mess``even USAAF has less models than IAF
    • Thanks Thanks x 6
  2. alimobin memon
    Offline

    alimobin memon FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,014
    Ratings:
    +0 / 409 / -0
    With this 2c802's,sd10,2wvr ok ..... but what abt multiple ejector racks?
  3. ziaulislam
    Offline

    ziaulislam FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2010
    Messages:
    1,834
    Ratings:
    +1 / 569 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    i think multiple ejectors if used will be benefit in air to air configuration(carrying 2 sd-10 on one hard point) but not for carrying c-802. as its too heavy (200kg vs 900 kg approx)
  4. maverick1977
    Offline

    maverick1977 FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2009
    Messages:
    301
    Ratings:
    +0 / 259 / -0
    In anti ship mode, you gotta remember that IN will have aircover to protect its assists. I am sure the configuration will work differently, where one JF17 formation will go in A2A mode to attack all IN air assessts and another JF17 formation will be in Anti ship mode with more than 2 two C802s/3s and close range PL5-2s for interception.
  5. ziaulislam
    Offline

    ziaulislam FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2010
    Messages:
    1,834
    Ratings:
    +1 / 569 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    you are right..there are many combination in which PAF might go. it will depend upon the situation
    neverthe less y point was to show jf-17 multi-role capablites and to clarify that JF-17 is as potent in naval role as in any other role. so it will be wastage of money and difficulty in operation to add new platforms.
    thats one reason i am against J-11
  6. ahussains
    Offline

    ahussains FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2007
    Messages:
    458
    Ratings:
    +0 / 5 / -0
    SO J-11 Like a FAST FOOD BURGER ready in 10 minutes :pakistan:
  7. HAIDER
    Offline

    HAIDER SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    May 21, 2006
    Messages:
    5,791
    Ratings:
    +4 / 3,962 / -1
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United States
    [​IMG]
  8. Black Widow
    Offline

    Black Widow SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2011
    Messages:
    5,563
    Ratings:
    +0 / 4,348 / -2

    No, It can not. It need hell lot of modification and 2 years time to be operational on Naval deck.
  9. PakShaheen79
    Offline

    PakShaheen79 SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2007
    Messages:
    1,679
    Ratings:
    +0 / 745 / -0
    Well, I think other than negating the naval blockade, Thunder, in Naval role, would ensure the complete denial of any hostile amphibious landing on Pakistani shores.
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  10. nomi007
    Offline

    nomi007 SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2010
    Messages:
    3,811
    Ratings:
    +6 / 2,504 / -0
    may be the pakistan navy will add jf-17 thunder
  11. ziaulislam
    Offline

    ziaulislam FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2010
    Messages:
    1,834
    Ratings:
    +1 / 569 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    navy in past has shown interst in acquiring jf-17
  12. killerx
    Offline

    killerx FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2007
    Messages:
    1,383
    Ratings:
    +0 / 612 / -0
    JF17 naval version is not produced yet i think but it would be close to MIG29K right :yahoo:
  13. S.Y.A
    Offline

    S.Y.A RESEARCH & DEV

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2008
    Messages:
    561
    Ratings:
    +0 / 394 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    jf-17 must be modified in later blocks
  14. AZADPAKISTAN2009
    Offline

    AZADPAKISTAN2009 ELITE MEMBER

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2009
    Messages:
    9,005
    Ratings:
    +6 / 5,612 / -2
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Pakistan Navy
    [​IMG]
    Anti Sub role/Anti Ship
    Breguet Atlantic - 6 Delivered in 2011
    P3 Orions - 5


    Anti Ship Operations:
    12 Mirages (Excocet Enabled)
    Needed 36 JF17 thunder in Multi Role capacity (Anti Ship plus support for protecting assets)


    Air Support for Ships
    What Pakistan Certainly need is J11 Fleet of 36 to really compliment the existing fleet
    [​IMG]
  15. Pakistanisage
    Offline

    Pakistanisage PROFESSIONAL

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2011
    Messages:
    6,895
    Ratings:
    +7 / 10,569 / -1
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United States


    Masroor is a better choice than Faisal. Hopefully we have learned something from the Mehran Fiasco ?