What's new

Jan Lokpal: Difference between AAP Govt and Anna Hazare's anti-corruption bill

dray

BANNED
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
10,853
Reaction score
-1
Country
India
Location
India
Jan Lokpal: Difference between AAP Govt and Anna Hazare's anti-corruption bill
Posted by: Avinash Sharma Updated: Sunday, November 29, 2015, 14:45 [IST]

New Delhi, Nov 29: Denouncing the anti-graft Jan Lokpal bill drafted by Arvind Kejriwal Government, expelled AAP leader Prashant Bhushan has termed it a watered-down version of the original legislation.

Bhushan, who was among the men to have drafted the older version termed it as a farce and fraud on the people.

29-1448786960-aap.jpg


Bhushan, one of the founding members of AAP, has alleged that the Kejriwal government has made changes in the anti-graft bill that was drafted during Anna Hazare's anti-corruption movement.

Here is all what according to Prashant Bhushan - who claims to have the copy of the present bill - is the main difference between AAP's previous and the present Jan Lokpal Bill.

'Deliberate' attempt to provoke confrontation between Centre and Delhi Govt:

Bhushan has alleged that by giving Jan Lokpal the power to probe cases of corruption against central government employees, the AAP government wanted to provoke confrontation.

Expanding the jurisdiction of the Lokpal, by proposing to bring Centre under its ambit is uncalled for and is aimed at stoking another fight.

"In all the draft Lokpals that we have prepared till date, state Lokayuktas are not supposed to have any such powers," said Bhushan.

"This clause will never be approved by the central government and the bill will never get passed, hence Kejriwal will play the victim card," said Bhushan.

Appointment and removal of Lokpal:

Noting that they had said that Lokpal could be removed only if the Supreme Court held him guilty after a complaint against him, Bhushan said this bill holds that he could be removed by a resolution passed by two-thirds of the assembly members. Hence, the Lokayukta will be under the ambit of the government thus he won't be able to work independently and fearlessly.

The present Bill purportedly says that a four-member selection committee, comprising the Chief Minister, Speaker, Leader of Opposition and Delhi High Court Chief Justice would appoint the Lokpal, while the removal can be ensured by a motion in the Assembly with two-thirds majority.

Given the strength of the AAP government in Delhi Assembly, two-third majority is not a tough task for the incumbent government.

State Govt to appoint members of Lokpal:

The new version says that appointment and removal of members will be done by the state government whereas the previous draft formed during Anna movement demanded that it should be done through an independent ombudsman.

No role of Lt Governor and the President:


According to the draft Jan Lokpal Bill, the power to remove the ombudsman has been given to the House that can pass the motion in the Assembly with two-thirds majority, ensuring that the office of the Jan Lokpal remains at the beck and call of its political masters. Thus, LG can't himself remove the Lokpal unless the government asks him to do so.

Kejriwal acting like Modi, alleges Prashant Bhushan:

Kejriwal does not like to be questioned like "Modi" so he has chosen not to make the contents of the Bill public.

"No activist or movement in India's history has played such a big fraud with people. This will only ensure that the Central government does not approve and the Bill never gets passed. Kejriwal never had the intention to form a strong Lokpal body," said the senior lawyer.

Jan Lokpal: Difference between AAP Govt and Anna Hazare's anti-corruption bill - Oneindia
 
I never took Anna Hazare seriously....don't know why.
I do remember Kiran Bedi( or someone senior) predicting that Kejriwal had political ambitions and ergo he supported Anna Hazare, who had become India's new Gandhi overnight.
Credit where credit is due; so I must accrpt that Kejriwal and Anna Hazare have been able to influence Indian politics. Delhi elections 2013 gave every voter a new found sense of power when AAP made its electoral debut.
I supported the party and its agenda back then, but I am sure I never liked Kejriwal.
Prashant Bhushan should stop washing dirty linen in public, he reminds me of Reham Khan in Pakistan, who is attempting something similar on IK. Such people neither get sympathy nor the support of people, even if what they've revealed happens to be the truth.
Let's not forget how Prashant came into limelight after his "give Kashmir to Paksitan" statement.
I am not sure I'll trust a guy who craves for attention.
 
AAP has become such an embarrassment, I can't believe and quite ashamed of the fact I once supported these guys! :|

Prashant Bhushan should stop washing dirty linen in public, he reminds me of Reham Khan in Pakistan, who is attempting something similar on IK. Such people neither get sympathy nor the support of people, even if what they've revealed happens to be the truth.
Let's not forget how Prashant came into limelight after his "give Kashmir to Paksitan" statement.
I am not sure I'll trust a guy who craves for attention.

PB has been in the forefront of exposing various Congress scandal and when no media house would publish radia tapes, it was PB who sent the tapes to Outlook. I'd not write him off although I find him bit too much of idealist.
 
Jan Lokpal: Difference between AAP Govt and Anna Hazare's anti-corruption bill
Posted by: Avinash Sharma Updated: Sunday, November 29, 2015, 14:45 [IST]

New Delhi, Nov 29: Denouncing the anti-graft Jan Lokpal bill drafted by Arvind Kejriwal Government, expelled AAP leader Prashant Bhushan has termed it a watered-down version of the original legislation.

Bhushan, who was among the men to have drafted the older version termed it as a farce and fraud on the people.

29-1448786960-aap.jpg


Bhushan, one of the founding members of AAP, has alleged that the Kejriwal government has made changes in the anti-graft bill that was drafted during Anna Hazare's anti-corruption movement.

Here is all what according to Prashant Bhushan - who claims to have the copy of the present bill - is the main difference between AAP's previous and the present Jan Lokpal Bill.

'Deliberate' attempt to provoke confrontation between Centre and Delhi Govt:

Bhushan has alleged that by giving Jan Lokpal the power to probe cases of corruption against central government employees, the AAP government wanted to provoke confrontation.

Expanding the jurisdiction of the Lokpal, by proposing to bring Centre under its ambit is uncalled for and is aimed at stoking another fight.

"In all the draft Lokpals that we have prepared till date, state Lokayuktas are not supposed to have any such powers," said Bhushan.

"This clause will never be approved by the central government and the bill will never get passed, hence Kejriwal will play the victim card," said Bhushan.

Appointment and removal of Lokpal:

Noting that they had said that Lokpal could be removed only if the Supreme Court held him guilty after a complaint against him, Bhushan said this bill holds that he could be removed by a resolution passed by two-thirds of the assembly members. Hence, the Lokayukta will be under the ambit of the government thus he won't be able to work independently and fearlessly.

The present Bill purportedly says that a four-member selection committee, comprising the Chief Minister, Speaker, Leader of Opposition and Delhi High Court Chief Justice would appoint the Lokpal, while the removal can be ensured by a motion in the Assembly with two-thirds majority.

Given the strength of the AAP government in Delhi Assembly, two-third majority is not a tough task for the incumbent government.

State Govt to appoint members of Lokpal:

The new version says that appointment and removal of members will be done by the state government whereas the previous draft formed during Anna movement demanded that it should be done through an independent ombudsman.

No role of Lt Governor and the President:


According to the draft Jan Lokpal Bill, the power to remove the ombudsman has been given to the House that can pass the motion in the Assembly with two-thirds majority, ensuring that the office of the Jan Lokpal remains at the beck and call of its political masters. Thus, LG can't himself remove the Lokpal unless the government asks him to do so.

Kejriwal acting like Modi, alleges Prashant Bhushan:

Kejriwal does not like to be questioned like "Modi" so he has chosen not to make the contents of the Bill public.

"No activist or movement in India's history has played such a big fraud with people. This will only ensure that the Central government does not approve and the Bill never gets passed. Kejriwal never had the intention to form a strong Lokpal body," said the senior lawyer.

Jan Lokpal: Difference between AAP Govt and Anna Hazare's anti-corruption bill - Oneindia
Modi ji hum thik kaam kar rahe hai .. please humne kaam karne dijiye.

KejriwalAghoriBaba.jpg
 
PB has been in the forefront of exposing various Congress scandal and when no media house would publish radia tapes, it was PB who sent the tapes to Outlook. I'd not write him off although I find him bit too much of idealist.
He's a motor mouth.
If he wants to be heard then he must learn to control his urge to utter mendacious nonsense.
 
He's a motor mouth.
If he wants to be heard then he must learn to control his urge to utter mendacious nonsense.
Well I find the crooning of YoYa more unsettling. If a person isn't angry when he has every reason to be, he is not showing his true self.
 
@MilSpec not sure about your position about Kejriwal now...I think he did similar to what Indira Gandhi did to Congress, that is hijacking the party. Now he has an one year ad budget of hefty 526 crore to promote "Kejriwal ki sarkar", something that he criticized when not in power! And this bill seems to be self-defeating, and probably made in a way to be blocked by the centre, so that he gets to play further politics. What do you think?

And @Bang Galore @Spectre ?
 
PB has been in the forefront of exposing various Congress scandal and when no media house would publish radia tapes, it was PB who sent the tapes to Outlook. I'd not write him off although I find him bit too much of idealist.

I agree completely. Too much of an idealist. You need such guys but they really can't work in a party in India. Great guy to go fighting in the courts but not amenable to working in a political set up.
 
@MilSpec not sure about your position about Kejriwal now...I think he did similar to what Indira Gandhi did to Congress, that is hijacking the party. Now he has an one year ad budget of hefty 526 crore to promote "Kejriwal ki sarkar", something that he criticized when not in power! And this bill seems to be self-defeating, and probably made in a way to be blocked by the centre, so that he gets to play further politics. What do you think?

And @Bang Galore @Spectre ?
I haven't followed the news, let me read a little bit, if he effed up, I will call it as i do for everyone else.
 

Back
Top Bottom