What's new

Jamaat has no right to do politics in Bangladesh...

onionkiller

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Sep 12, 2013
Messages
475
Reaction score
0
Jamaat has no right to do politics
in Bangladesh: Son of Jamaat
founder
Julfikar Ali Manik,
Muktasree Chakma Sathi
Politics
‘Jamaat-e-Islami in Bangladesh and
Pakistan are just the left and right
hands of the same person – there
is only one head controlling the
both’
Syed
Haider Farooq Maudoodi, son of
Jamaat-e-Islami founder Syed
Abul A’la Maudoodi
Photo- Syed Zakir Hossain
A son of Jamaat-e-Islami founder
Syed Abul A’la Maudoodi believes
that the religion-based party should
not be allowed to continue politics
in Bangladesh since it opposed the
country’s birth.
In an exclusive interview with the
Dhaka Tribune last night, Syed
Haider Farooq Maudoodi, one of
Maudoodi’s nine children, said
parties that opposed a nation’s
birth should not have the right to
do politics in that country.
“Rightfully, Jamaat does not have
the right to do politics in
Bangladesh since it opposed the
birth of this country,” said Haider
Farooq, who along with all his
siblings has never been involved
with Jamaat’s politics in Pakistan
although their father founded the
Islam-based communal political
party in 1941.
Haider, who was a civil pilot and is
now a columnist in Lahore, Pakistan,
arrived in Dhaka on Thursday for the
first time after Bangladesh’s
independence to attend an
international conference on religion
and politics that began on Friday.
He insisted on giving the interview
in Urdu, saying: “I hate English.”
Haider said their father had always
kept them away from politics for
some reasons but never explained
them. He, however, talked about
many issues, including politics, use
of religion in politics, radicalism, war
crimes of 1971 and the ongoing trial
of war criminals in Bangladesh.
“As locals you also had a duty to not
let them [those who were against
the birth of Bangladesh] do politics
here. But when Sheikh Shaheb
[Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur
Rahman] was gone, the party in
power used them and they are
backing them even today,” he said.
One of the independent Bangladesh
government’s first decisions was to
ban five political parties, including
Jamaat-e-Islami, which not only
opposed the nation’s independence
but also actively helped Pakistani
occupation forces commit genocide
and other war crimes.
The four other political parties were
the Muslim League and all its
factions, the Pakistan Democratic
Party, Nezam-e-Islam, and Pakistan
People’s Party.
Soon after the assassination of
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur
Rahman in 1975, military ruler Ziaur
Rahman opened politics for all in
the name of introducing multi-party
democracy, which gave Jamaat the
opportunity to enter Bangladesh’s
political arena again.
Asked if Jamaat in Bangladesh and
Pakistan had any relation between
them even after 42 years of
Bangladesh’s liberation, Haider
Farooq said the two parties in the
two countries were “just the left and
right hands of the same person
there is only one head controlling
the both.”
He vehemently opposes the idea of
having a state religion and using of
religion in politics.
“It is very dangerous when there is
a state religion. The state is a roof
under which every sort of people
from different religions can stay,” he
said.
“If a country wants to practise
democracy, it cannot have a state
religion. If a state has a state
religion, then it is practising
something else, not democracy.”
Haider said: “Whenever religion was
interpreted politically, it killed
humans, and it ruined humanity.”
The son of the religious preacher
said: “Religion helps a person
become a better one. Every religion
Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikhism, Islam
they teach individuals to be better.
“Religion also teaches us to
understand that all of our
forefathers were one and we should
not hate one another. The Holy
Qur’an talks for humankind so that
one can be better.
“The only aim of using religion in
politics is to exploit people’s
emotion. All they [politicians who
use religion] want to achieve is their
own goals by using people’s
religious sentiments.”
About the ongoing trial of 1971 war
criminals at the Dhaka tribunals,
Haider Farooq said: “No one should
go unpunished, particularly when
they committed crimes against
humanity.
“If it is proved that they did
atrocities in Bangladesh, they should
be punished. It is needed to
establish the rule of law.”
Asked if he thought Jamaat in
Bangladesh and Pakistan had
contribution to Islamic radicalism,
terrorism and militancy, Haider said:
“The two parties have only
contributed to making Islam
controversial and all these people
have the same goal.”
When asked about his views about
Islamist parties’ claim that Islam is
all about politics, Syed Haider
Farooq Maudoodi posed a counter
question: “If Islam is politics, then
those who are not casting votes for
Islamist parties are they kafirs?

source. dhakatribune.com
 
They should be confined to do the social work only. But they are greedy and powr hungry and milks people's faith for their gains. :astagh:
 
This guy forgets Jama'at had also opposed founding of Pakistan. Jama'at was born in British India. In India the party is very much functional with headquarters in New Delhi.
 
This guy forgets Jama'at had also opposed founding of Pakistan. Jama'at was born in British India. In India the party is very much functional with headquarters in New Delhi.

But in India its not a political party.

And for your kind information Jamaat is still against the creation of pakistan and they work for the betterment and education of Indians.

You will be surprised to note that while Govt. of India also funds Jaamat's Madarsas, Computer Training centers and vocational training centers the Jammat in India provide education to Hindus too. :woot:

Its the what our religion teaches us selfless work for the mankind and complete dedication towards the one and only Allah swt. :angel:
 
But in India its not a political party.

And for your kind information Jamaat is still against the creation of pakistan and they work for the betterment and education of Indians.

You will be surprised to note that while Govt. of India also funds Jaamat's Madarsas, Computer Training centers and vocational training centers the Jammat in India provide education to Hindus too. :woot:

Its the what our religion teaches us selfless work for the mankind and complete dedication towards the one and only Allah swt. :angel:

Yesterday when I checked Jama'at was still a recognized political party in India maintaining head office in New Delhi. It was banned twice but the bans were overturned by the higher judiciary.
 
This guy forgets Jama'at had also opposed founding of Pakistan. Jama'at was born in British India. In India the party is very much functional with headquarters in New Delhi.
I believe Haider Farooq Maududi would say Jamaat should shun politics in Pakistan too.
 
1. Jama'at in Pakistan has become somewhat revolutionary after it's experience in the Afghan Jihad against the Soviets. But Jama'at BD is a bourgeois political party pursuing Westminster model of democracy. Its leaders have conveniently used the Islamic connection to obtain finance from gullible Arabs. On ground the most seats it has won in Parliament is 17 out 300. That too piggy-backing BNP. In the current parliament it has probably 1 seat. It faces opposition from extremist elements who aim to establish pure Islamic rule. To that end Jama'at BD enjoys support from USA,West and possibly India too.

2. However, for her political survival, Hasina has been able to hoodwink Indian media and political leadership into believing Jama'at was dangerous. Also striking on Jama'at fits into the secularization anti-Two Nation Theory program that has been specified to Hasian by her masters/protectors.After the elections due Dec-Jan, India will realize Hasina has been taking them for a jolly ride.
 
Jamat has all the right as long as people are with them and even if people are not with them. Indian and Awami league opinions don't count.

I am not at all religious but every party, as long as they do not espouse violence and hatred, has every right to stand in elections.
 
Jamaat has no right to do politics
in Bangladesh: Son of Jamaat
founder
Julfikar Ali Manik,
Muktasree Chakma Sathi
Politics
‘Jamaat-e-Islami in Bangladesh and
Pakistan are just the left and right
hands of the same person – there
is only one head controlling the
both’
Syed
Haider Farooq Maudoodi, son of
Jamaat-e-Islami founder Syed
Abul A’la Maudoodi
Photo- Syed Zakir Hossain
A son of Jamaat-e-Islami founder
Syed Abul A’la Maudoodi believes
that the religion-based party should
not be allowed to continue politics
in Bangladesh since it opposed the
country’s birth.
In an exclusive interview with the
Dhaka Tribune last night, Syed
Haider Farooq Maudoodi, one of
Maudoodi’s nine children, said
parties that opposed a nation’s
birth should not have the right to
do politics in that country.
“Rightfully, Jamaat does not have
the right to do politics in
Bangladesh since it opposed the
birth of this country,” said Haider
Farooq, who along with all his
siblings has never been involved
with Jamaat’s politics in Pakistan
although their father founded the
Islam-based communal political
party in 1941.
Haider, who was a civil pilot and is
now a columnist in Lahore, Pakistan,
arrived in Dhaka on Thursday for the
first time after Bangladesh’s
independence to attend an
international conference on religion
and politics that began on Friday.
He insisted on giving the interview
in Urdu, saying: “I hate English.”
Haider said their father had always
kept them away from politics for
some reasons but never explained
them. He, however, talked about
many issues, including politics, use
of religion in politics, radicalism, war
crimes of 1971 and the ongoing trial
of war criminals in Bangladesh.
“As locals you also had a duty to not
let them [those who were against
the birth of Bangladesh] do politics
here. But when Sheikh Shaheb
[Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur
Rahman] was gone, the party in
power used them and they are
backing them even today,” he said.
One of the independent Bangladesh
government’s first decisions was to
ban five political parties, including
Jamaat-e-Islami, which not only
opposed the nation’s independence
but also actively helped Pakistani
occupation forces commit genocide
and other war crimes.
The four other political parties were
the Muslim League and all its
factions, the Pakistan Democratic
Party, Nezam-e-Islam, and Pakistan
People’s Party.
Soon after the assassination of
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur
Rahman in 1975, military ruler Ziaur
Rahman opened politics for all in
the name of introducing multi-party
democracy, which gave Jamaat the
opportunity to enter Bangladesh’s
political arena again.
Asked if Jamaat in Bangladesh and
Pakistan had any relation between
them even after 42 years of
Bangladesh’s liberation, Haider
Farooq said the two parties in the
two countries were “just the left and
right hands of the same person
there is only one head controlling
the both.”
He vehemently opposes the idea of
having a state religion and using of
religion in politics.
“It is very dangerous when there is
a state religion. The state is a roof
under which every sort of people
from different religions can stay,” he
said.
“If a country wants to practise
democracy, it cannot have a state
religion. If a state has a state
religion, then it is practising
something else, not democracy.”
Haider said: “Whenever religion was
interpreted politically, it killed
humans, and it ruined humanity.”
The son of the religious preacher
said: “Religion helps a person
become a better one. Every religion
Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikhism, Islam
they teach individuals to be better.
“Religion also teaches us to
understand that all of our
forefathers were one and we should
not hate one another. The Holy
Qur’an talks for humankind so that
one can be better.
“The only aim of using religion in
politics is to exploit people’s
emotion. All they [politicians who
use religion] want to achieve is their
own goals by using people’s
religious sentiments.”
About the ongoing trial of 1971 war
criminals at the Dhaka tribunals,
Haider Farooq said: “No one should
go unpunished, particularly when
they committed crimes against
humanity.
“If it is proved that they did
atrocities in Bangladesh, they should
be punished. It is needed to
establish the rule of law.”
Asked if he thought Jamaat in
Bangladesh and Pakistan had
contribution to Islamic radicalism,
terrorism and militancy, Haider said:
“The two parties have only
contributed to making Islam
controversial and all these people
have the same goal.”
When asked about his views about
Islamist parties’ claim that Islam is
all about politics, Syed Haider
Farooq Maudoodi posed a counter
question: “If Islam is politics, then
those who are not casting votes for
Islamist parties are they kafirs?

source. dhakatribune.com

awami league [or rawami league] has no right to do politics in banglasdesh considering all the war cirmes they commited in cohoots woth the indian BSF and army in 1971.....they destroyed the bengali muslims and should be banned as shoudl be the bharatis....
 
awami league [or rawami league] has no right to do politics in banglasdesh considering all the war cirmes they commited in cohoots woth the indian BSF and army in 1971.....they destroyed the bengali muslims and should be banned as shoudl be the bharatis....

do u know histry ? it was pakistan army who killeng innocent bengali muslims. India just help to innocent muslims.
 
do u know histry ? it was pakistan army who killeng innocent bengali muslims. India just help to innocent muslims.

that is indian propaganda....it was BSF masquerading as muktis with a sprinkling ofeast paksitani bengalis who did 90% of the crimes....the AL was the indian fornt organization for this .....
 
Jamaat has the right to do politics in Bangladesh.I wouldn't vote for them but they have their rights.
 

Back
Top Bottom