What's new

Iran's Syria project: pushing population shifts to increase influence

Kuwaiti Girl

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 8, 2016
Messages
2,287
Reaction score
0
Country
Kuwait
Location
Kuwait
Iran's Syria project: pushing population shifts to increase influence
Iran seeks arch of control from Tehran to Israel’s border by moving Shia communities into areas where Sunnis have fled or been forced out

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...shing-population-shifts-to-increase-influence

In the valleys between Damascus and Lebanon, where whole communities had abandoned their lives to war, a change is taking place. For the first time since the conflict broke out, people are starting to return.

But the people settling in are not the same as those who fled during the past six years.

The new arrivals have a different allegiance and faith to the predominantly Sunni Muslim families who once lived there. They are, according to those who have sent them, the vanguard of a move to repopulate the area with Shia Muslims not just from elsewhere in Syria, but also from Lebanon and Iraq.

The population swaps are central to a plan to make demographic changes to parts of Syria, realigning the country into zones of influence that backers of Bashar al-Assad, led by Iran, can directly control and use to advance broader interests. Iran is stepping up its efforts as the heat of the conflict starts to dissipate and is pursuing a very different vision to Russia, Assad’s other main backer.

Russia, in an alliance with Turkey, is using a nominal ceasefire to push for a political consensus between the Assad regime and the exiled opposition. Iran, meanwhile, has begun to move on a project that will fundamentally alter the social landscape of Syria, as well as reinforcing the Hezbollah stronghold of north-eastern Lebanon, and consolidating its influence from Tehran to Israel’s northern border.

“Iran and the regime don’t want any Sunnis between Damascus and Homs and the Lebanese border,” said one senior Lebanese leader. “This represents a historic shift in populations.”

Key for Iran are the rebel-held towns of Zabadani and Madaya, where Damascus residents took summer breaks before the war. Since mid-2015 their fate has been the subject of prolonged negotiations between senior Iranian officials and members of Ahrar al-Sham, the dominant anti-Assad opposition group in the area and one of the most powerful in Syria.

Talks in Istanbul have centred on a swap of residents from two Shia villages west of Aleppo, Fua and Kefraya, which have both been bitterly contested over the past three years. Opposition groups, among them jihadis, had besieged both villages throughout the siege of Aleppo, attempting to tie their fate to the formerly rebel-held eastern half of the city.

The swap, according to its architects, was to be a litmus test for more extensive population shifts, along the southern approaches to Damascus and in the Alawite heartland of Syria’s north-west, from where Assad draws much of his support.

Iran is engineering population swaps in Syria

Labib al-Nahas, the chief of foreign relations for Ahrar al-Sham, who led negotiations in Istanbul, said Tehran was seeking to create areas it could control. “Iran was very ready to make a full swap between the north and south. They wanted a geographical continuation into Lebanon. Full sectarian segregation is at the heart of the Iranian project in Syria. They are looking for geographical zones that they can fully dominate and influence. This will have repercussions on the entire region.

“[The sieges of] Madaya and Zabadani became the key issue to prevent the opposition from retaking Fua and Kefraya, which have exclusive populations of Shia. Hezbollah consider this a security zone and a natural extension of their territory in Lebanon. They have had very direct orders from the spiritual leadership of Iran to protect them at any cost.”

Iran has been especially active around all four towns through its Hezbollah proxies. Along the ridgelines between Lebanon’s Bekaa Valley and into the outskirts of Damascus, Hezbollah has been a dominant presence, laying siege to Madaya and Zabadani and reinforcing the Syrian capital. Wadi Barada to the northwest, where ongoing fighting is in breach of the Russian-brokered ceasefire, is also part of the calculations, sources within the Lebanon-based movement have confirmed.

Elsewhere in Syria, demographic swaps are also reshaping the geopolitical fabric of communities that, before the war, had coexisted for centuries. In Daraya, southwest of Damascus, more than 300 Iraqi Shia families moved into neighbourhoods abandoned by rebels last August as part of a surrender deal. Up to 700 rebel fighters were relocated to Idlib province and state media announced within days that the Iraqis had arrived.

Shia shrines in Daraya and Damascus have been a raison d’etre for the presence of Hezbollah and other Iranian-backed Shia groups. The Sayeda Zainab mosque on the capital’s western approach has been heavily fortified by Hezbollah and populated by families of the militant group, who have moved in since late-2012. Tehran has also bought large numbers of homes near the Zainab mosque, and a swathe of land, which it using to create a security buffer – a microcosm of its grander project.

Abu Mazen Darkoush, a former FSA commander who fled Zabadani for Wadi Barada said Damascus’s largest Islamic shrine, the Umayyad mosque, was now also a security zone controlled by Iranian proxies. “There are many Shia who were brought into the area around the mosque. It is a Sunni area but they plan for it to be secured by Shias, then surrounded by them.”

Senior officials in neighbouring Lebanon have been monitoring what they believe has been a systemic torching of Land Registry offices in areas of Syria recaptured on behalf of the regime. A lack of records make it difficult for residents to prove home ownership. Offices are confirmed to have been burned in Zabadani, Daraya, Syria’s fourth city, Homs, and Qusayr on the Lebanese border, which was seized by Hezbollah in early 2013.

Darkoush said whole neighbourhoods had been cleansed of their original inhabitants in Homs, and that many residents had been denied permission to return to their homes, with officials citing lack of proof that they had indeed lived there.

“The first step in the plan has been achieved,” he said. “It involved expelling the inhabitants of these areas and burning up anything which connects them to their land and homes. The second step will be replacing the original inhabitants with newcomers from Iraq and Lebanon. “

In Zabadani, Amir Berhan, director of the town’s hospital, said: “The displacement from here started in 2012 but increased dramatically in 2015. Now most of our people have already been taken to Idlib. There is a clear and obvious plan to move Sunnis from between Damascus and Homs. They have burned their homes and fields. They are telling people ‘this place is not for you anymore’.

“This is leading to the fragmentation of families. The concept of family life and ties to the land is being dissolved by all this deportation and exile. It is shredding Syrian society.”

At stake in post-war Syria, with the war beginning to ebb, is more than who lives where when the fighting finally stops. A sense of identity is also up for grabs, as is the bigger question of who gets to define the national character.

“This is not just altering the demographic balance,” said Labib al-Nahas. “This is altering the balance of influence in all of these areas and across Syria itself. Whole communities will be vulnerable. War with Iran is becoming an identity war. They want a country in their likeness, serving their interests. The region can’t tolerate that.”
 
It is not new. It is the same model which have been adopted in all these following cities.

Baghdad - From 35% Sunni to 15%
Fallujah - From 25% Sunnis are now almost extinct here.

(Figures are not absolute but quite closer.)
 
It is not new. It is the same model which have been adopted in all these following cities.

Baghdad - From 35% Sunni to 15%
Fallujah - From 25% Sunnis are now almost extinct here.

(Figures are not absolute but quite closer.)
Speaking of Iraq, I came across this map last night:

Iraq_Ethnic_Shift_1947-2017_lg.png
 
Any proof for this dangerous claim @Kuwaiti Girl ?
Don't doubt i will shove your mouth little piggy if you had no proof for this dirty claim.
Syria belongs to Syrians. Iran had almost 2,000 martyrs to protect Sunni population of Syria.
And about the map you have provided over Iraq's population doesn't prove the decreasing of Sunni population. It proves that the rate of ShiA population's growth was far more than other religions and that figure is calculated based on overall increasing of population. As i said Sunni population had increase ratio but on the other hand the rate of ShiA's increased population compared to others is the most one. It is a mathematical rate. I suppose you don't know the truth Kuwaitigirl.
1iraq.JPG

2iraq.JPG

Iraq's population is growing year by year.
Main link :

http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/iraq-population/

Tell me your proof about Syria :devil:

Why do you retarded idiots believe in western propaganda?
It's almost 100 years they dividing retarded Muslims with this kind of excuses.
The main news is this one @Kuwaiti Girl
Iran is populating the non-populated Golan heights against Israel's presence. Read this if you are not the same Al-Andulus
'ISRAEL CONCERNED WITH BUILD-UP OF IRANIAN FORCES IN SYRIA NEAR GOLAN BORDER'
BYJPOST.COM STAFF

29 SEPTEMBER 2015 09:19

Likud Minister Steinitz says Israel will make it clear to US, Russia and other world powers that Iranian forces must not be allowed to mass on Israel's border.


ShowImage.ashx



Israeli soldiers stand near the border with Syria in the Golan Heights. (photo credit:REUTERS)

Israel is concerned with the build-up of Iranian forces in Syria, near the border with Israel, National Infrastructure, Energy and Water Minister Yuval Steinitz (Likud) said in an interview with Army Radio on Tuesday.

Steinitz's comments came amid the recent addition of Russian troops to Syria to bolster President Bashar Assad in his fight against Islamic State and other rebel groups challenging his rule in Syria. However, the Likud minister was more concerned with the infusion of troops from Assad's other central backer, Iran.



Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.




"Nobody wants to see Russian forces in the area of the Golan Heights, but we definitely don't want to see Iranian forces near Israel," Steinitz told Army Radio.

Steinitz, speaking as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was en route to New York to address the United Nations General Assembly on Thursday, said that Israel would clarify Israel's concerns regarding Iranian forces in Syria in discussions with the relevant parties.

"In all of our discussions, first and foremost with the United States, but also with Russia and the rest of the world powers, we must make sure that the Iranian forces will stay in Iran," Steinitz said.

A senior Israeli security source said earlier this month that an Iranian Islamic Republican Guards Corp force, comprised of hundreds of soldiers, recently entered Syria to assist the embattled Assad regime.

Tehran dispatched its force “in light of Assad’s” ongoing distress, the source stated, adding that the deployment is part of a wider Russian-Iranian coordinated effort to prevent what remains of the Assad regime from collapsing.

According to Israeli assessments, the Assad regime currently controls 25 to 30 percent of Syria, consisting of Damascus and the Syrian coastline, where the regime’s minority Alawite support base is centered.

The source described a meeting last month between Quds Force commander Qassam Suleimani and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow as an event preceding the Russian- Iranian military initiative to rescue Assad.

Yaakov Lappin contributed to this report.



&NCS_modified=20151026135954&MaxW=640&imageVersion=default&AR-151029209.jpg

Israeli troops on the Golan Heights during the 1973 war.

In Golan, a battle looms between Iran and Israel
Jean-Loup Samaan

October 26, 2015 Updated: October 26, 2015 04:59 PM

More than four years into the Syrian conflict, the Golan Heights have become the centre of gravity for an indirect war between Iran and Israel. This was not an inevitable turn of events, as the area had been home to one of the quietest borders in the Middle East for decades. Although Israel seized the plateau in 1967 and unilaterally annexed it in 1981, the Golan had not witnessed clashes like South Lebanon or the Sinai Peninsula. This dramatically changed with the worsening of the war in Syria.





By the end of 2012, Iran and Hizbollah had sent hundreds of fighters to support the Bashar Al Assad regime. Fights with Syrian rebels, in particular Jabhat Al Nusra, increased on the Syrian side of the Golan and its vicinity. In April 2013, the Qusayr battle saw Hizbollah deploying a contingent of more than 1,200 men. In the following months, a war of attrition emerged in Quneitra and the Qalamoun mountains, with a new major battle flaring in Yabroud in February 2014.





But progressively it appeared that Hizbollah and the Iranians were not solely fighting Syrian rebels, but turning the Golan into a new forward base to target Israel. Various reports claim that tunnels and bunkers are being built to prepare for the next conflict with the Israeli military.

Soon the Israelis reacted by playing a rather ambiguous game with Syrian rebels on the other side of the border. Although it was common knowledge that medical care had been provided to Syrian civilians in Israeli hospitals, the United Nations Disengagement Observation Force based in the Golan were, by 2014, describing something bigger.





In its December 2014 report, the observation force "sporadically observed armed members of the opposition interacting with [the] Israeli Defence Force across the ceasefire line in the vicinity of United Nations positions".

The rumours of a marriage of convenience between Israeli forces and rebels conveniently served the conspiratorial narrative of the Syrian regime, but it also upset the Druze in Israel, who expressed concern over the treatment of their community in Syria by groups like Jabhat Al Nusra. As a result, Brig Gen Moti Almoz, a spokesman for the Israeli military, denied any collaboration with Jabhat Al Nusra.





The second Israeli reaction to the Iran-Hizbollah strategy for the Golan was increased air strikes. There had been a steady growth in the frequency and intensity of Israeli raids in Syria in the last four years, culminating last January when a helicopter bombed a Hizbollah convoy in the governorate of Quneitra. Seven militiamen died, among them Jihad Mughniyeh, the son of one of the founders of Hizbollah. But soon, journalists discovered that an Iranian brigadier general, Mohammad Ali Allahdadi, died in the Israeli strike. Hizbollah retaliated 10 days later in the Chebaa farms by shooting one missile at an Israeli patrol, killing two soldiers and injuring seven others.





Although further escalation was prevented, clashes are far from over, as evidenced by the latest Israeli bombing of Syrian regime forces on the Golan earlier this month. In fact there are numerous reasons to believe the battle will continue.

With the Iranian enemy at its gate and the planned expansion of settlements in the Heights, Israeli military assertiveness is likely to increase. Israeli officials consider Iran in Syria a bigger threat than ISIL. There is also a feeling that the nuclear deal with world powers now emboldens Iran.





In addition, an Israeli company announced the discovery of significant volume of hydrocarbons at its drilling sites in the Golan Heights, raising the regional stakes a bit more.

On the Syrian side of the border, Hizbollah and the Iranians are holding ground against rebels. Additional resources are on their way from Iran. In mid-October, Gen Qasem Suleimani, commander of the Quds Force, visited the Golan to reaffirm its strategic importance to Tehran before travelling to Beirut to visit the graves of Hizbollah’s fighters.




But the biggest unknown is the impact of the Russian air campaign. Russia and Iran are closely coordinating their military effort in defence of Mr Al Assad. Gen Soleimani travelled to Moscow in July to make the case for the intervention.

Russian planes have bombed the positions of Syrian rebel groups in Homs, but so far have not flown sorties in the Golan area. Obviously if a new clash between Israel and Iran occurs, this would put the Russians in a very delicate situation.





Against that backdrop, what could the UN do to prevent a new and perilous escalation?

Unfortunately not much, as the organisation faces dire difficulties in preserving its presence in the area. Already in 2013, following clashes between rebels and loyal forces in the area, Austria announced that it would withdraw its contributing forces to the disengagement observation force. The Austrian decision reflects a broader nervousness among the contributing nations.





As a result, given the number of forces involved, the stakes, and the absence of communication channels to establish rules of the game, the likelihood of escalation is high. In that sense, while the world eyes the fight against ISIL, an old-fashion conflict further south in the Golan looms and could well spark a regional war.

Jean-Loup Samaan is a researcher for the Nato Defence College in Italy


Yeah we are filling Golan heights with our missiles and soldiers ready to attack Israel. They are ready for offense with our leader's command. If only you stupid idiots don't interrupt us. Idiots idiots idiots
 
I actually think it's a clever strategy on Iran's part.

Granted, it's not the moral thing to do, but from a geopolitical point of view, this is a really clever move.

In fact, I'd be very surprised if Iran hadn't done this already.

Pushing the opposition groups and their families towards Idlib and possibly into Turkey is a very sound strategy. It doesn't sound right from a moral point of view, but it's an effective strategy nonetheless.
 
I actually think it's a clever strategy on Iran's part.

Granted, it's not the moral thing to do, but from a geopolitical point of view, this is a really clever move.

In fact, I'd be very surprised if Iran hadn't done this already.

Pushing the opposition groups and their families towards Idlib and possibly into Turkey is a very sound strategy. It doesn't sound right from a moral point of view, but it's an effective strategy nonetheless.
65000 militants of opposition have signed the peace treaty. They have put their guns down after the ceasefire and they are not recognized as terrorist groups.
The small remaining groups almost 15000 militants are Al-Nusra, ISIS and Al-Qaeda. Turkey has also recognized them as terrorist groups. If you agree that Turkey is a Sunni country.
hahhah create an other account Al-Andulus! your tricks are not working anymore
 
65000 militants of opposition have signed the peace treaty. They have put their guns down after the ceasefire and they are not recognized as terrorist groups.
The small remaining groups almost 15000 militants are Al-Nusra, ISIS and Al-Qaeda. Turkey has also recognized them as terrorist groups. If you agree that Turkey is a Sunni country.
hahhah create an other account Al-Andulus! your tricks are not working anymore
Most of the opposition fighters are radicals by the way.
 
Most of the opposition fighters are radicals by the way.
Really?!
I thought that Iran is the radical one there.
Evil Iranians are killing Sunnis of Syria. Co'mmon don't forget your mission here. Iranian ShiA vampires are thirsty of their Sunni brother's blood.
I believe you
 
Really?!
I thought that Iran is the radical one there.
Evil Iranians are killing Sunnis of Syria. Co'mmon don't forget your mission here. Iranian ShiA vampires are thirsty of their Sunni brother's blood.
I believe you
I'm not trying to demonize Iran in this thread.

Other members think I support Iran, and you think I'm against Iran lol. Please make up your minds lol.

I'm just sharing an article I came across on the internet.

The Syrian war isn't between good and evil. It's just another typical politically-driven / politically-motivated war.
 
I'm not trying to demonize Iran in this thread.

Other members think I support Iran, and you think I'm against Iran lol. Please make up your minds lol.

I'm just sharing an article I came across on the internet.

The Syrian war isn't between good and evil. It's just another typical politically-driven / politically-motivated war.
So this thread could be the worst thing about Iran's activity in Syria. I justify Sunni subscribers of PDF to go angry with Iran right after reading this article full of lies. Meanwhile i have no doubt you are a big anti-Iran sub here. I'm still in this forum and you too. We shall see :rap:
And the Syrian war is a war between us and Israel-USA. It's lighter than skylight. :yes4:
 
So this thread could be the worst thing about Iran's activity in Syria. I justify Sunni subscribers of PDF to go angry with Iran right after reading this article full of lies. Meanwhile i have no doubt you are a big anti-Iran sub here. I'm still in this forum and you too. We shall see :rap:
And the Syrian war is a war between us and Israel-USA. It's lighter than skylight. :yes4:
I'm neither for nor against Iran's actions in Syria. Frankly speaking, I'm not a big fan of any country in this miserable region.

As for the article I shared, I think it's very possible that Iran is trying to change the demographic makeup of southern Syria in order to secure its land access to Lebanon.
 
3101.jpg

Civilians being evacuated from Darayya in 2016. Shia families from Iraq later moved into the abandoned neighbourhoods.

In the valleys between Damascus and Lebanon, where whole communities had abandoned their lives to war, a change is taking place. For the first time since the conflict broke out, people are starting to return.

But the people settling in are not the same as those who fled during the past six years.

The new arrivals have a different allegiance and faith to the predominantly Sunni Muslim families who once lived there. They are, according to those who have sent them, the vanguard of a move to repopulate the area with Shia Muslims not just from elsewhere in Syria, but also from Lebanon and Iraq.

The population swaps are central to a plan to make demographic changes to parts of Syria, realigning the country into zones of influence that backers of Bashar al-Assad, led by Iran, can directly control and use to advance broader interests. Iran is stepping up its efforts as the heat of the conflict starts to dissipate and is pursuing a very different vision to Russia, Assad’s other main backer.

Russia, in an alliance with Turkey, is using a nominal ceasefire to push for a political consensus between the Assad regime and the exiled opposition. Iran, meanwhile, has begun to move on a project that will fundamentally alter the social landscape of Syria, as well as reinforcing the Hezbollah stronghold of north-eastern Lebanon, and consolidating its influence from Tehran to Israel’s northern border.

“Iran and the regime don’t want any Sunnis between Damascus and Homs and the Lebanese border,” said one senior Lebanese leader. “This represents a historic shift in populations.”

Key for Iran are the rebel-held towns of Zabadani and Madaya, where Damascus residents took summer breaks before the war. Since mid-2015 their fate has been the subject of prolonged negotiations between senior Iranian officials and members of Ahrar al-Sham, the dominant anti-Assad opposition group in the area and one of the most powerful in Syria.

Talks in Istanbul have centred on a swap of residents from two Shia villages west of Aleppo, Fua and Kefraya, which have both been bitterly contested over the past three years. Opposition groups, among them jihadis, had besieged both villages throughout the siege of Aleppo, attempting to tie their fate to the formerly rebel-held eastern half of the city.

The swap, according to its architects, was to be a litmus test for more extensive population shifts, along the southern approaches to Damascus and in the Alawite heartland of Syria’s north-west, from where Assad draws much of his support.

Labib al-Nahas, the chief of foreign relations for Ahrar al-Sham, who led negotiations in Istanbul, said Tehran was seeking to create areas it could control. “Iran was very ready to make a full swap between the north and south. They wanted a geographical continuation into Lebanon. Full sectarian segregation is at the heart of the Iranian project in Syria. They are looking for geographical zones that they can fully dominate and influence. This will have repercussions on the entire region.

“[The sieges of] Madaya and Zabadani became the key issue to prevent the opposition from retaking Fua and Kefraya, which have exclusive populations of Shia. Hezbollah consider this a security zone and a natural extension of their territory in Lebanon. They have had very direct orders from the spiritual leadership of Iran to protect them at any cost.”

Iran has been especially active around all four towns through its Hezbollah proxies. Along the ridgelines between Lebanon’s Bekaa valley and into the outskirts of Damascus, Hezbollah has been a dominant presence, laying siege to Madaya and Zabadani and reinforcing the Syrian capital. Wadi Barada to the north-west, where ongoing fighting is in breach of the Russian-brokered ceasefire, is also part of the calculations, sources within the Lebanon-based movement have confirmed.

Elsewhere in Syria, demographic swaps are also reshaping the geopolitical fabric of communities that, before the war, had coexisted for centuries. In Darayya, south-west of Damascus, more than 300 Iraqi Shia families moved into neighbourhoods abandoned by rebels last August as part of a surrender deal. Up to 700 rebel fighters were relocated to Idlib province and state media announced within days that the Iraqis had arrived.

1851.jpg


Shia shrines in Darayya and Damascus have been a raison d’etre for the presence of Hezbollah and other Iranian-backed Shia groups. The Sayeda Zainab mosque on the capital’s western approach has been heavily fortified by Hezbollah and populated by families of the militant group, who have moved in since late 2012. Tehran has also bought large numbers of homes near the Zainab mosque, and a tract of land, which it is using to create a security buffer – a microcosm of its grander project.

Abu Mazen Darkoush, a former FSA commander who fled Zabadani for Wadi Barada said Damascus’s largest Islamic shrine, the Umayyad mosque, was now also a security zone controlled by Iranian proxies. “There are many Shia who were brought into the area around the mosque. It is a Sunni area but they plan for it to be secured by Shias, then surrounded by them.”

Senior officials in neighbouring Lebanon have been monitoring what they believe has been a systematic torching of Land Registry offices in areas of Syria recaptured on behalf of the regime. A lack of records make it difficult for residents to prove home ownership. Offices are confirmed to have been burned in Zabadani, Darayya, Syria’s fourth city, Homs, and Qusayr on the Lebanese border, which was seized by Hezbollah in early 2013.

Darkoush said whole neighbourhoods had been cleansed of their original inhabitants in Homs, and that many residents had been denied permission to return to their homes, with officials citing lack of proof that they had indeed lived there.

“The first step in the plan has been achieved,” he said. “It involved expelling the inhabitants of these areas and burning up anything which connects them to their land and homes. The second step will be replacing the original inhabitants with newcomers from Iraq and Lebanon.”

In Zabadani, Amir Berhan, director of the town’s hospital, said: “The displacement from here started in 2012 but increased dramatically in 2015. Now most of our people have already been taken to Idlib. There is a clear and obvious plan to move Sunnis from between Damascus and Homs. They have burned their homes and fields. They are telling people ‘this place is not for you anymore’.

“This is leading to the fragmentation of families. The concept of family life and ties to the land is being dissolved by all this deportation and exile. It is shredding Syrian society.”

At stake in postwar Syria, with the war beginning to ebb, is more than who lives where when the fighting finally stops. A sense of identity is also up for grabs, as is the bigger question of who gets to define the national character.

“This is not just altering the demographic balance,” said Labib al-Nahas. “This is altering the balance of influence in all of these areas and across Syria itself. Whole communities will be vulnerable. War with Iran is becoming an identity war. They want a country in their likeness, serving their interests. The region can’t tolerate that.”

TheGuardian
 
Pushing the opposition groups and their families towards Idlib and possibly into Turkey is a very sound strategy.
This is not Iran strategy. you should come back and watch one of old interview of assad with Russia Today.
He clearly explain.
there is not anything to hide.
 
ayatollah khameini thinks he is another nadir shah by the way he goes to on pillaging neighbouring countries in their moment of weakness.
 

Back
Top Bottom