What's new

Indian Space Capabilities

The road to India's Cryogenic Engine

Armies tend to herald their victories with the blowing of bugles. The Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) chose to announce its entry into the exclusive club of nations capable of building cryogenic engines with a thunderous sound of a rocket test that lasted 12 long minutes.

The sound, equivalent to that of 10 Jumbo jets taking off simultaneously, reverberated across the Mahendragiri hills in Tamil Nadu where India’s ultra-modern liquid engine test facility is located.

It signalled the culmination of ISRO’s 13-year quest to build engines using cryogenic fuels that are super-cooled to around minus 250 degrees. (Cryo originates from the Greek word Kryos which literally means ice-cold.)

The quest began in 1993 when Russia, under pressure from the US, reneged from an agreement to supply India with the technology to build such engines. The Americans successfully argued that it would give India the capability to launch Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs).

ISRO needed cryogenic engines to power the upper stages of its Geo-Synchronous Launch Vehicle (GSLV) which is capable of putting two-tonne INSAT-class communications satellite into a geo-synchronous orbit at 36,000 km above the earth.

Cryogenic engines that use a mixture of super-cooled liquid hydrogen and oxygen as propellants are highly efficient providing more ‘bounce per ounce’ of fuel.

The thrust these engines generate is usually 50 per cent more than that provided either by liquid or solid rockets for the same weight of fuel (see graphic). In doing so, it gives a space-faring nation the flexibility to put heavier satellites or other payloads into space.

So as not to delay its GSLV programme, ISRO renegotiated the agreement with Russia for outright purchase of two cryogenic engines.

It simultaneously began designing and building an indigenous cryogenic engine similar to the Russian one for future flights. ISRO had hoped to complete the indigenous project within five years but the sheer complexity of building such an engine frustrated scientists for many years.

Barring the performance designs given by the Russians, the fully assembled engines purchased by them were, as one scientist put it, “like a blackbox”.

That meant that ISRO had to do everything from scratch. Given that the rocket has to withstand extremely hostile temperatures that vary from super-cooled temperatures before ignition to superhot ones when it fires, metallurgy was a key hurdle that had to be overcome.

The right alloys had to be developed that could take these massive temperature fluctuations and also keep the weight of the engine down.

There were other complications. The problem with liquid hydrogen is that it has a tendency to return to its gaseous form rapidly and is highly inflammable.


Cryogenic engine under testIt ignites spontaneously when it comes in contact with atmosphere. So the temperature has to be tightly monitored and the pipelines and pumps through which liquid hydrogen is fed have to be totally leak proof. This meant that joints had to be welded rather than screwed tight.

The cryogenic engine’s project director Mohammed Muslim says, “There is absolutely no margin for error.” Other major hurdles were developing the thrust chamber, which required intricate grooves to be machined, and the high speed turbo pumps.

Initial efforts by ISRO engineers met with little success. The first test that took place in 1999 ended in abject failure when one of the gas generators blew on the test stand.

With delays inevitable, in 2001 ISRO negotiated with the Russians to supply five more cryogenic engines to power its GSLV flights at a cost of $5 million (Rs 20 crore) each.

It was only in 2006 that the ISRO team felt it had, to an extent, mastered the range of technologies needed for the test. The first firing of the engine in October 2006 went off smoothly for the planned 50-second duration.

Emboldened, the scientists tried for a longer duration in January 2007 but had to abort it within 30 seconds as an extraneous fire occurred in one of the pipelines. More recently in August this year, the system fired smoothly for 500 seconds but because of a technical glitch, it had to be aborted before completion.

After identifying the problem, the scientists felt that it was a minor issue and so scheduled another test for mid-November. They waited anxiously at the Mahendragiri test stand to watch as the countdown began for the engine. This time the test was flawless.

ISRO Chairman Madhavan Nair, who was there too, told India Today: “For ISRO, it is the culmination of the development of rocket technology—we are now totally self-reliant in the entire range of rocketry whether solid, liquid or cryogenic.”

Nair points out that the development was critical not just because of the foreign exchange it saves but also because getting cryogenic engines from the international market is proving increasingly difficult.

He says, “Not only were other nations asking for the moon in terms of price but they were also not available for the next five years.” He denies that India took Russian help to develop the engine as alleged by some scientists and points out that ISRO not only indigenously developed a host of new materials needed for the engine but also the various critical components for it.

Much more though needs to be done. The research organisation is in the process of building the more powerful GSLV Mark III launch vehicle capable of putting a four-tonne INSAT class satellite in orbit, almost twice the weight of its current capacity.

For this, an all new heavy cryogenic engine is being developed. The first test is being planned next year. Even the recently tested cryogenic engine has to be modified if it has to fly for a future mission to carry slightly heavier satellites than the existing two-tonne class.

More importantly, the proof of ISRO’s capability would be demonstrated only when the cryogenic engine that it has developed flies on the GSLV and performs perfectly. Till then, ISRO scientists can take the much deserved credit while keeping their fingers firmly crossed.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Russian tech assistance to India has been outstanding - no wonder India is loath to damage such ties over Gorshkov's - though we'll have to wait and see....
 
we should thank Russia for providing Cryogenic engine which was never tested in russia it self ,was not up to the mark and was hard casing you open it you will never be able to put it back ,thank god our Cryogenic engine will be more tested and reliable then those
 
we should thank Russia for providing Cryogenic engine which was never tested in russia it self ,was not up to the mark and was hard casing you open it you will never be able to put it back ,thank god our Cryogenic engine will be more tested and reliable then those

So you are suggesting that India has been gambling with other nation's years of work and millions of dollars worth of investment by sending up their satellites in vehicles powered by "less tested and less reliable" Russian cryogenic engines?

Thats pretty shoddy and unethical don't you think? Selling services you know are "inferior and unreliable"?
 
we should thank Russia for providing Cryogenic engine which was never tested in russia it self ,was not up to the mark and was hard casing you open it you will never be able to put it back ,thank god our Cryogenic engine will be more tested and reliable then those

A lot of the Indian space program is of Russian origin. That's alright, but to harp on about it as an achievement is nothing special. Soon almost every country in the world will be able to lob a man into space for quite a cheap price. The achievement comes with being a world leader in the area, as the Russians were, the Americans are, and the Chinese will become.
 
So you are suggesting that India has been gambling with other nation's years of work and millions of dollars worth of investment by sending up their satellites in vehicles powered by "less tested and less reliable" Russian cryogenic engines?

Thats pretty shoddy and unethical don't you think? Selling services you know are "inferior and unreliable"?


Moscow agreed to limit the transfer to a small number of rocket engines and not production technology and under watch full eyes of usa do you think Russia could have provided very power full engines ? we had to work with whatever we had ,we lost one satellite because of this Russian cryogenic engines which could not power it to the required orbit
 
A lot of the Indian space program is of Russian origin. That's alright, but to harp on about it as an achievement is nothing special. Soon almost every country in the world will be able to lob a man into space for quite a cheap price. The achievement comes with being a world leader in the area, as the Russians were, the Americans are, and the Chinese will become.


if Space technology was Plug and play every country could have launched a man into space by now ,only two real masters and achievers of space are Russia and America while china has more made in Russia/or copied part in their rocket then any one else
 
if Space technology was Plug and play every country could have launched a man into space

No, because it costs a lot of money, which most countries are too poor to have. Japan obviously has the money, but probably not the desire.

by now ,only two real masters and achievers of space are Russia and America while china has more made in Russia/or copied part in their rocket then any one else

Sure. I don't think China's achievements to date in space are anything amazing. Their aerospace industry is much more outstanding.
 
No, because it costs a lot of money, which most countries are too poor to have. Japan obviously has the money, but probably not the desire.

it is not only the money ,it also comes down to manpower ,talent and R&D and availability of technology ,saddam had lot of money but was still not able to make a nuke ,after India had tested nukes in 1974 he had told his generals " if hind can do it why cannot we do it ?? " this was when iraq was in process of R&D of developing nukes but it never did even after 30 years
 
India installs antennas for planned moon mission
(AFP)

16 December 2007

BANGALORE - India has installed a pair of giant antennas to monitor a planned robotic mission to the moon next year, making it one of a few nations with deep space tracking ability, officials said.

The deep space network at Byalalu, 45 kilometres (30 miles) from Bangalore, will keep track of the Chandrayaan-1 lunar mission and provide command support during its two-year orbit around the moon, India’s space agency said.

The facility, which reporters visited Saturday, consists of two powerful dish antennas 32 metres (105 feet) and 18 metres in diameter.

“The network will be used to send commands and receive telemetry signals, including massive scientific data from the spacecraft,” said S.K. Shivakumar, director of the Indian Space Research Organisation’s (ISRO) Telemetry Tracking and Command Network.

By installing the network at a cost of one billion rupees (25 million dollars), India joins the United States, Europe, Japan, China and Russia in the ability to track deep space missions, officials said.

India plans to launch Chandrayaan-1 in April next year, joining Asian nations Japan and China in moon exploration. The spacecraft will conduct a lunar orbit at a distance of 385,000 kilometres from Earth.

The first robotic mission next year, budgeted at 100 million dollars, will be followed by another in 2012. Dates for a manned mission will be announced in 2008.

India’s deep space network will serve as the base station for future planetary exploration, such as a planned mission to Mars, Shivakumar said.

It also will be used to track the country’s proposed Astrosat, a space telescope designed to scout for galactic clusters, new stars beyond the Milky Way and a variety of cosmological phenomena.

Khaleej Times Online - India installs antennas for planned moon mission
 
Russia, India may jointly develop new space shuttle


MOSCOW: India and Russia could jointly develop a new generation space shuttle for manned space flights and negotiations for the project are expected to begin in January, according to a top space official.

"India has expressed desire to participate in the development of a new reusable manned spaceship and from January next we will discuss this issue with the Energia Rocket and Space Corporation," Chief of Russia's Federal Space Agency, Roskosmos, Anatoly Perminov said.

Although Perminov did not identify the project, but 'Energia' Corporation is reportedly developing reusable spacecraft 'Clipper', which is expected to replace Soviet-designed Soyuz spaceships in Russia's national space programme.

Perminov said India was Russia's privileged space partner with which it was working in different directions and has granted Indian space experts access to many of its ground control facilities.

"With India we are interacting in carrier rockets, their components, dual use systems, global positioning system GLONASS and mission control and ground tracking equipment," Perminov said here at an year-end news conference.

Russia, which launched three satellites on Christmas to commercially operationalise Soviet developed global navigation satellite system (GLONASS), has taken India onboard in further developing of the system to end dependence on the Pentagon controlled Global Positioning System (GPS), which was twice switched off to enable US strikes during the Balkan and Iraq wars.

Russia, India may jointly develop new space shuttle-Rest of World-World-The Times of India
 
Russia already has the 'Space Shuttlesky' called Buran. The project was prematurely abandoned to economic crisis in the late eighties.

Why not revive the Buran?

Not many know this but the Russians have a space shuttle themselves, it's name is Buran. The Russians watched the American space program and realized that they needed a space shuttle.
As you can see it looks very much like the American shuttle and the Russians admit borrowing the blueprints, but the Buran ("snowstorm" in Russian) is not an exact copy.

The Buran Spacecraft made one unmanned space flight on November 15, 1988. It was launched by the Engeria, which is the world's most powerful rocket. It returned to a runway landing in Russia. The flight was unmanned, controlled only by computers. With it's deteriorating economy, the Russians could not justify the expense of making the Buran shuttles operational, and the original and several uncompleted models today sit in storage.


71cc9481ff68f9000677a9f634ce91b2.gif


The Americans once thought of changing the length of the SRB's on the shuttle but found out that if they only lengthened them by 5 centimeters, the aerodynamics of the launch would change significantly and would result in a failure that would destroy the craft. So it is very unlikely that the Russians copied the American shuttle, they would have had to make their own simulations and wind tunnel tests to find a configuration that would work with their powerful rocket, the Energiya.

To transport Buran from the space center Baikonur to the launch pad they used rails with a powerful locomotive. Originally, they had planned to launch the shuttle only 3-4 times a year in addition to the 100 rocket launches usually made. Unlike the American shuttle the Buran was only going to be used for missions which could not be done by other craft. These missions included repair missions and return of old satellites which could not be done by the small Soyuz spacecraft, it was also going to be launched to dock with the current Mir station to deliver crew and supplies and bringing home scientific material.

NASA Space Shuttle & Buran/Energia Shuttle

5a7244214f68c484d909126d6e63e19e.gif



The Buran is not launched like the U.S. space shuttle. NASA uses 2 solid rocket boosters (SRB's) and 3 liquid engines fueled by an external tank filled with oxygen and hydrogen to boost it into orbit. The Russians on the other hand uses just one giant rocket, in fact it is the largest and most powerful rocket in the world. It's name is Energiya, it can lift 100 tons. It stands 60 meters high and produces a thrust of 4000 tons. With the shuttle Buran attached it can still lift 30 tons, this is 5 tons more than the shuttle can with it's 25 tons.



Buran is/was more expensive to launch because the engines on the Energiya rocket burn up in the atmosphere and are not reused like the American SRB's and 3 liquid engines mounted on the shuttle. Unlike the American shuttle, Buran does not help to boost itself into orbit, Energiya does all the work. The rocket is currently not in use because all of the satellites launched are relatively small and only require a small rocket like a Proton to boost into orbit. When the Russian space program was still going strong they had planned to use the Energia to boost a new space station into orbit (Mir2) consisting of several modules each weighing 100 tons. The current Mir only consists of modules weighing 20 tons and the ISS will also consist of modules weighing 20 tons because that is the maximum weight the Proton rocket can carry and the shuttle can launch when it has to reach the inclination and height of the new station.

Transporting people to the new Russian station was also going to be made by Buran with the Soyuz only acting as a rescue vehicle but as you probably have noticed those plans were scraped because of the lack of funds.

Google Image resultaat voor http://www.hightechscience.org/Buran_Space_Shuttle_Comparsion_1.gif
 

Back
Top Bottom