What's new

India warns US of impact on ties

Indo-guy

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Aug 14, 2013
Messages
4,820
Reaction score
2
Country
India
Location
Singapore
India warns U.S. of impact on ties after re-indictment of Indian woman diplomat - Xinhua | English.news.cn


English.news.cn 2014-03-15 19:06:37
India warns U.S. of impact on ties after re-indictment of Indian woman diplomat
NEW DELHI, March 15 (Xinhua) -- India Saturday strongly reacted to the second indictment against its diplomat Devyani Khobragade in the United States, saying it was an "unnecessary" step and any measure consequent to the decision will "unfortunately" impact upon efforts on both sides to India-U.S. strategic partnership.
A spokesperson of the External Affairs Ministry said the court in the United States has no jurisdiction in India over her and the government will therefore no longer engage on this case in the U.S. legal system.
"We are disappointed that the relevant office of the United States Department of Justice chose to obtain a second indictment against Devyani Khobragade, despite the fact that the first indictment and arrest warrant were dismissed earlier this week," the spokesperson said.
"This was an unnecessary step...We reiterate that the case has no merit. Therefore this second indictment has no impact on our stated position. Now that Dr. Khobragade has returned to India, the court in the U.S. has no jurisdiction in India over her. Government will, therefore, no longer engage on this case in the U. S. legal system," he added.
Dashing hopes of a closure of the Devyani Khobragade affair, an American prosecutor, Preet Bharara, has secured a fresh indictment of the Indian diplomat at the center of a major India-U.S. diplomatic row three months ago.
Two days after a New York judge dismissed the visa fraud case against Khobragade, India's then consul general in New York, a U. S. grand jury Friday again indicted her on same criminal charges.
Khobragade, 38, was accused of fraud and was arrested before being expelled by the United States after being formally charged.
The issue led to a diplomatic mini-crisis between New Delhi and Washington. India retaliated by expelling one U.S. diplomat and reducing privileges of U.S. missions here.





Fresh indictment against Devyani unnecessary: MEA - The Hindu



India has warned that the step could ``unfortunately impact'' bilateral ties with the United States.



After a few weeks when the Indo-US relations appeared to be getting back on course, the second indictment in New York against woman diplomat Devyani Khobragade has caused it to slide, with India warning that the step could ``unfortunately impact'' bilateral ties.
The Government has also decided not to engage on this case in the U.S. legal system anymore, because as far as India is concerned, the case has no merit.
Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Syed Akbaruddin described as an ``unnecessary step,'' a U.S. Department of Justice office opting for a second indictment against Dr. Khobragade despite the fact that the first indictment and arrest warrant were dismissed earlier this week.
``Any measures consequent to this decision in the US will unfortunately impact upon efforts on both sides to build the India-US strategic partnership, to which both sides are committed,'' he added.
``Therefore this second indictment has no impact on our stated position. Now that Dr. Khobragade has returned to India, the Court in the U.S. has no jurisdiction in India over her,'' he stated.
Two days back, India had given a guarded response to a US court's dismissal of fraud charges against Dr. Khobragade. It had welcomed the dismissal but noted that the order did not take into account some aspects of the case that led to a cooling off of bilateral ties for three months.
``We welcome this ruling, which dismisses the January 9 indictment against Khobragade and vacates any arrest warrant in the existing case,’’ Mr. Syed Akbaruddin had said.
``We note that the judgment does not consider the merits of the case or our well-known position, including on the admissibility of the arrest of Devyani Khobragade in December 2013. Given the importance both sides attach to their bilateral strategic partnership, [the] Government hopes to see further progress in this matter in a manner consistent with international norms and conventions,’’ Mr. Akbaruddin had said in a written statement. The Hindu had said India qualified its welcome because the suit against Dr. Khobragade was dismissed but under US laws, prosecutors are allowed to bring fresh charges in future.
The arrest and search of Dr. Khobragade on December 12 led to sharp downturn in Indo-US ties with New Delhi pulling off all extra privileges given to US diplomats and going by the book, asked it to shut down an unlicensed cinema screening facility, removed security bollards and withdrew special airport entry passes.
This was followed by senior Government functionaries and politicians declining to meet a bi-party US Congressional delegation that had come to the country in January. Officials and political leaders also did not turn up at functions where they would have to share the stage with US Ambassador Nancy Powell. The issue also came up in Parliament where External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid promised he would get Dr. Khobragade back home.
Earlier this month, structured bilateral dialogue restarted with the arrival of the US State Department's new points-person for the region Neha Biswal. This was followed by a week long Indo-US dialogue on energy which was capped by a meeting between US Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz.





New U.S. charges against diplomat rile India - latimes.com

MUMBAI, India — The Indian government Saturday expressed its displeasure with the U.S. Justice Department for refiling criminal charges against a diplomat whose arrest in New York last year on charges of underpaying her domestic help caused a crisis in bilateral relations.
The U.S. attorney’s office in Manhattan on Friday issued a new indictment against the diplomat, Devyani Khobragade, just two days after a judge dismissed a similar indictment on diplomatic immunity grounds. Khobragade has returned to India and is unlikely ever to answer the charges in New York.
Foreign ministry spokesman Syed Akbaruddin called the new indictment “an unnecessary step” that would cause further trouble between Washington and New Delhi.
“Any measures consequent to this decision in the U.S. will unfortunately impact upon efforts on both sides to build the India-U.S. strategic partnership, to which both sides are committed,” Akbaruddin said in a statement.
India has maintained that the case against Khobragade has no merit. The 39-year-old diplomat, who was serving as deputy consul general at the Indian mission in New York, was arrested in December after her Indian housekeeper accused her of paying her far below the minimum wage.
Prosecutors said Khobragade lied to U.S. authorities to obtain a work visa for the housekeeper, claiming she was paying her about $500 a month while actually paying her less than $3 an hour. Khobragade disputed the charges, citing diplomatic immunity.
But when U.S. marshals strip-searched Khobragade and held her in detention alongside other prisoners, Indian officials vehemently complained that she had been mistreated. The incident stirred up long-simmering mistrust between Washington and New Delhi as Indian officials accused the United States of arrogance and imposed retaliatory restrictions on Americans in the Indian capital.
The U.S. attorney in Manhattan, Preet Bharara, maintained that Khobragade was treated in accordance with the law and given some privileges that American arrestees wouldn’t get, such as being allowed extra time to make phone calls and arrange care for her two children, who remain in the United States.
The dispute caused headaches for the State Department and led Nisha Desai Biswal, the assistant secretary of State for South Asia, to cancel a planned visit to India. Biswal traveled to New Delhi last week and sounded a conciliatory note, saying the case "touched an emotional nerve in this country, for very understandable reasons."
On Jan. 9, the day before Khobragade was indicted, India assigned her to its U.N. mission, a role with broader diplomatic immunity than her consular position, and brought her back to New Delhi. U.S. District Judge Shira Scheindlin ruled Wednesday that the new position granted her immunity from prosecution but left the door open for prosecutors to file a new indictment because her immunity ended when she left the United States.
Akbaruddin, the foreign ministry spokesman, said that as far as India was concerned the case was closed.
“Now that Dr. Khobragade has returned to India, the court in the United States has no jurisdiction in India over her,” he said. “[The Indian] government will therefore no longer engage on this case in the United States’ legal system.”


http://www.latimes.com/world/worldnow/la-fg-wn-india-says-its-disappointed-by-new-us-charges-against-devyani-khobragade-20140315,0,7522593.story#ixzz2w3GtEtbx
 
Last edited:
Modi should warn.... However modi wont warn america as many indians (in IT sector) might vote against modi. However when modi takes over as pm than he should take action. Next month its election....
 
Modi should warn.... However modi wont warn america as many indians (in IT sector) might vote against modi. However when modi takes over as pm than he should take action. Next month its election....

Let us see .
Modi has his own reasons to take revenge with US .




Khobragade row: Livid India may opt for tit-for-tat response against US | Firstpost


As the summer gets hotter in India, you can expect an extremely cold and frigid climate enveloping the Indo-US bilateral equations. The relations between the world's most powerful democracy and its largest democracy are going downhill, courtesy Indian diplomat Devyani Khobragade.
The just-concluded India-US Energy Dialogue and visits by US Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asian Affairs Nisha Desai Biswal and US Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz earlier this month have proven to be blink-and-you-miss goodwill moves on the Indo-US radar screen.


The wrecker-in-chief of this strategic partnership is Preet Bharara, the India-born US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, who has got an arrest warrant issued against Khobragade following her re-indictment on charges of visa fraud and perjury. The new government, which should be in place in New Delhi by May end, will face a major foreign policy challenge: to save the Indo-US bilateral relationship.
As for the present UPA government, it has come up with a strong statement, making it clear that India will not be taking the new provocation from the Obama administration lying low. It is unlikely that the next Indian government, whatever its composition and whoever is the prime minister, will bring about any substantial change in this policy.
That is why it makes sense to analyse the Indian reaction on the latest Indo-US flashpoint.
Here is the complete official statement on the subject by Ministry of India's spokesperson Syed Akbaruddin on Saturday:
"We are disappointed that the relevant office of the United States Department of Justice chose to obtain a second indictment against an IFS officer, Dr Devyani Khobragade, despite the fact that the first indictment and arrest warrant were dismissed earlier this week.
This was an unnecessary step. Any measures consequent to this decision in the US, will unfortunately impact upon efforts on both sides to build the India-US strategic partnership, to which both sides are committed.
As far as India is concerned, we reiterate that the case has no merit. Therefore this second indictment has no impact on our stated position. Now that Dr Khobragade has returned to India, the Court in the United States has no jurisdiction in India over her.
Government will therefore no longer engage on this case in the United States' legal system."

In one sentence, the Indian response can be paraphrased in simple and naked terms thus: "You Americans can go and climb a wall, but we Indians will not budge an inch from our previously stated position."
The MEA has dubbed the US action as "an unnecessary step", but this is a gross understatement of the ground position as it exists today in the Indian diplomatic establishment. India has not said that it finds the US action "provocative" but its upcoming conduct with the US may leave the Americans in no doubt that this indeed is a more befitting expression of Indian policy makers vis a vis the US.
Here are the three ways in which New Delhi may deal with the Obama administration in the coming weeks and months.
1. All major Indo-US engagements are likely to be put on the back burner. No fresh deals, in defence or civilian nuclear cooperation or in any other field, are likely to be pushed, leave alone being inked.
2. India is likely to initiate the next phase of action against the American diplomats and other staff whose financial dealings are at an advanced stage of probe by the Central Board of Direct Taxes and other Indian agencies.
3. It is likely to deal sternly with American diplomats in the event of the slightest of violation of Indian laws, even if it is a small incident of traffic signal jumping, though the American embassy has already sensitized its staff to such a scenario.
Also, those who thought that Khobragade's career in the MEA is hanging in a balance would be told that she is firmly ensconced and there is no threat to her career. On the contrary, if this Indo-US spat continues, she could be given an even more important assignment.
The writer is a Firstpost columnist and a strategic analyst who tweets @Kishkindha.





Devyani re-indictment: India slams US

New Delhi, Mar 15 (IBNS): Calling the second indictment against Indian diplomat in USA Devyani Khobragade as an unnecessary step, India on Saturday said the move could 'unfortunately impact' the bilateral ties.

We are disappointed that the relevant office of the United States Department of Justice chose to obtain a second indictment against an IFS officer, Dr Devyani Khobragade, despite the fact that the first indictment and arrest warrant were dismissed earlier this week," Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) official spokesperson Syed Akbaruddin said in a statement.
"This was an unnecessary step. Any measures consequent to this decision in the US, will unfortunately impact upon efforts on both sides to build the India-US strategic partnership, to which both sides are committed," he said.
The spokesperson said India has reiterated that the case has 'no merit'.
He said: "As far as India is concerned, we reiterate that the case has no merit. Therefore this second indictment has no impact on our stated position. Now that Dr Khobragade has returned to India, the Court in the United States has no jurisdiction in India over her."
He said: "Government will therefore no longer engage on this case in the United States' legal system."
A US court has re-indicted Devyani Khobragade and an arrest warrant has been issued against her in the visa fraud case, said reports on Saturday.
The new indictment was filed at a federal court in Manhattan.
In a letter to United States District Judge William Pauley, US Attorney for the Southern District of New York Preet Bharara said: "An arrest warrant was issued. The Government will alert the Court immediately upon the defendant's arrest so that an appearance before Your Honor may be scheduled. At present, the defendant is believed to be in India."
Earlier on Friday, reports said an US court has dismissed indictment of Devyani Khobragade in the visa fraud case.
Giving its verdict, the court said she enjoyed full diplomatic immunity when the indictment was returned against her on Jan 9.
India fumed over the treatment meted out to Devyani Khobragade after her arrest and pushed USA to drop the charges of visa fraud against her over her missing Indian housekeeper and controversy over her "low wages" in America. The US had said she had to undergo the judicial process in the country.
She was subsequently transferred to a UN posting by India offering her more immunity though the charges against her remained.
Devyani Khobragade was the Deputy Consul General of India in New York when she was arrested.
 
Last edited:
Send one of their diplomats to Tihar , and make them spend the room with Rapists and murderers
 
USA is being incredibly foolish on this issue.

A visa oversight is relatively minor, compared to the other types of crimes committed by a lot of diplomats.

Certainly not worth creating a big diplomatic spat over it?
 
USA is being incredibly foolish on this issue.

A visa oversight is relatively minor, compared to the other types of crimes committed by a lot of diplomats.

Certainly not worth creating a big diplomatic spat over it?

yep . . its still better than the Raymond Davis case

But hey we are dealing with the Hypocrites :pleasantry:
 
USA is being incredibly foolish on this issue.

A visa oversight is relatively minor, compared to the other types of crimes committed by a lot of diplomats.

Certainly not worth creating a big diplomatic spat over it?

It's not US anymore, its the prosecutor at this point. The government has already washed their hand and given immunity to the diplomat, and a Federal judge has already thrown out the case. It's the original prosecutor that is now serious butt hurt that his case got thrown out and that he couldn't get further fame.
 
yep . . its still better than the Raymond Davis case

But hey we are dealing with the Hypocrites :pleasantry:

Exactly, Americans with "diplomatic immunity" have commited crimes like murder, and America still protects them!

And not just people like Raymond Davis, check out this page it is full of them:

Diplomatic immunity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Isn't that hypocritical, now they are making a huge diplomatic incident, over a minor visa oversight?
 
I think India shouldn't finger in this second case and let her handle with own expenses. There is a valid reason for the latest indictment. It's foolishness if India stretch it too far this time. One of her kid as an American citizen shouldn't hold Indian passport. Everyone of us know that is illegal.
 
USA is being incredibly foolish on this issue.

A visa oversight is relatively minor, compared to the other types of crimes committed by a lot of diplomats.

Certainly not worth creating a big diplomatic spat over it?
Now that's the point !!!! Then why is it happening ???
Two possibilites
1. Personal goals of Barara and inability of State department to control him
2. US administration wants to show india is noting more than a 3rd world country and they dont like indian policies on alot of things. Obama surely preffer Pak over India
 
Exactly, Americans with "diplomatic immunity" have commited crimes like murder, and America still protects them!

And not just people like Raymond Davis, check out this page it is full of them:

Diplomatic immunity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Isn't that hypocritical, now they are making a huge diplomatic incident, over a minor visa oversight?

On a positive note i find it ok . . . . its a wake up call for those who were expecting too much from US of A . . . guess their honeymoon period is almost over :coffee:
 
USA is being incredibly foolish on this issue.

A visa oversight is relatively minor, compared to the other types of crimes committed by a lot of diplomats.

Certainly not worth creating a big diplomatic spat over it?
It's quite evident that, something else is brewing in the state dept...
 
its not between India and US anymore,now its between her and the courts.India did her job by bringing her back,now if she wants to return to US its her problem.
 
It would be interesting to find out what impact did the first indictment draw on ties?

Well as we can see the first indictment and whole way the Devyani issue was kept simmering has affected Indo-US ties considerably .
Is there any doubt about that ?

Now that's the point !!!! Then why is it happening ???
Two possibilites
1. Personal goals of Barara and inability of State department to control him
2. US administration wants to show india is noting more than a 3rd world country and they dont like indian policies on alot of things. Obama surely preffer Pak over India

My personal opinion
1. This can't be happening without blessings of US state department .
2. US administration is sending strong message - It is up to us to read between the lines .

I think India shouldn't finger in this second case and let her handle with own expenses. There is a valid reason for the latest indictment. It's foolishness if India stretch it too far this time. One of her kid as an American citizen shouldn't hold Indian passport. Everyone of us know that is illegal.

That's what MEA has precisely done by saying that for us the case is closed and we will no longer engage US legal system .

But the deliberate act to rake up the issue with swiftness with US prosecution has proceeded with second indictment has to be addressed . and so MEA has been clear to send message to US that this may affect the bilateral ties .

India can't go with business as usual as the witch-hunt against Indian diplomat continues .

India has invested considerable political good will in Devyani issue and now even if it wishes it can't extricate from Devyani publicly .
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom