What's new

Govt may soon lose all control over Balochistan

Status
Not open for further replies.

AbhimanyuShrivastav

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jan 15, 2012
Messages
1,341
Reaction score
-3
‘Govt may soon lose all control over Balochistan’ - Pakistan - DAWN.COM

KARACHI: The prince of the defunct Kalat state and chief of the Baloch Rabita Ittefaq Tehreek, Prince Mohyuddin Baloch, has warned that if the government fails to settle by the end of 2015 the Balochistan issue according to the aspirations of people, it will soon lose all control over the situation.

“We have so far managed to restrain [disgruntled] Baloch people but after Dec 31, 2015 the situation will get out of our control and our rulers will no more be in a position to do anything to reverse it. After the end of this year, we will be forced to allow Baloch people to take any path they like,” said the prince at a press conference held at a local hotel here on Thursday.

He was accompanied by his younger brother Prince Yahya Baloch of Kalat.

Take a look: Cannot rule out presence of IS militants in Balochistan: Dr Malik

He said: “So far, our 5,000 children have been killed and some 10,000 people have been kidnapped, but no one should think that the resistance has been crushed. It is correct that Baloch are by nature slow, stubborn and quarrelsome, but when it comes to war no one can defeat them.”

The entire world was increasingly becoming interested in Balochistan and trying to take advantage of it because of its strategic position. All wanted to exploit its resources at the cost of Baloch people who remained deprived with little positive impact on their life, he said.

The prince who remained federal minister in military ruler Gen Ziaul Haq’s regime said: “My father Khan of Kalat had attached his autonomous state to that of Pakistan on the advice of the Quaid-i-Azam and in the hope that a big Islamic state was in the making, but after its coming into being, the Pakistan of the Quaid-i-Azam and Allama Iqbal was forgotten.

“Though we were a small state, we were content with whatever we had. Not only were we practising Islam but we also used to have a form of democracy in line with our Baloch traditions, but after joining Pakistan, we lost everything and were grossly neglected by the new state,” he said.

He recalled that a democratic government was dismissed in Balochistan in 1972 because everyone had set their sights on its resources and every ruler wanted to exploit its strategic position.

“Sometimes Baloch people were branded as traitors and foreign agents without producing any proof. But in spite of it we always talked about peace,” he said.

He said that from 1976 to 1999, the situation remained comparatively peaceful in the province but afterwards it went downhill. “Today we see use of force, mutilated bodies dumped in deserted places, even I could have got killed but let me make it clear that at present Baloch people are not at war but are staging protests and even those who have climbed to mountains tops are not engaged in fighting,” he said.

He said the objective of the protest was to draw the government’s attention and make it listen to them but, regretfully, no one was paying any heed to their cries. “If someone thinks Baloch organisations have vanished into thin air, he is mistaken. No doubt some Baloch leaders are abroad and others lie low within the country, but all resistance groups are part of Baloch nation and everyone has its sphere of influence,” he said.

In reply to a question the prince said the purpose of his press conference was to awaken the establishment in Lahore and Islamabad from their deep slumber and bring home to them the fact that Baloch people were not happy with the present situation. “Pakistan at present is passing through the worst crisis of its history. The country has not even a semblance of governance. Some say it is being ruled by people in uniform, others say people in black suits are running the affairs and yet others say people in civvies are real rulers,” he said.

He said that he did not recognise Nawaz Sharif as a true ruler because he did not have genuine authority. “He is merely a face of the establishment. In case of any change, such rulers will fly to the country where they have amassed their assets,” he remarked.
 
Please avoid flame-baiting. Disintegration of Pakistan will result in destabilization of the region that will cause a bigger headache to Iran, Afghanistan, and India. At present, Pakistan as a state acting as a buffer; once this buffer is gone, there will be nothing in between Iran and India and Afghanistan and India. One more 'Quid pro quo' nonsense and you'll be recommended for a ban. Anti-state elements whether TTP or outsiders proposing and/or supporting terrorism in Pakistan (and or any other country for that matter) will not be tolerated here.

It has nothing to do with flame baiting. Why should India keep quiet when there is moral support for Kashmir? And feel free to recommend me for a ban. Why is it that when you advocate moral support for Kashmir it is valid and when we decide to advocate moral support for Balochistan it irks you?By the way, in case you missed the "If you cause trouble in Kashmir" part.

I too have long believed in Pakistan acting as a buffer state. But, that is valid only to your NWFP province. Not the one facing Iran. The PA is our first line of defence against the Talibs and that is a valid point. But expecting us to keep quiet and do nothing while the fire in Kashmir is started is foolhardy. There will be a response and that reponse will be in Balochistan. This is practically what will happen. Divert your attention to internal problems, just the way you tried to do to us. We have done it once in Bangladesh. 65 led to 71. In the same way, more trouble in Kashmir will lead to more trouble in another location. And this is quid pro quo.

Now, you may decide to bury head in the sand and say, ban the chap, but, how else do you think is going to be the response.
 
Disintegration of Pakistan will result in destabilization of the region that will cause a bigger headache to Iran, Afghanistan, and India. At present, Pakistan as a state acting as a buffer; once this buffer is gone, there will be nothing in between Iran and India and Afghanistan and India.

That is an assumption.. we can deal with the what ever tactical and strategic threat environment presents itself, there is no need for us to be dependent on any state for our own security.
 
Iran also has a Baloch province they would be idiotic ninkapoops if they even think of arming BLA

Agreed. But Iran is more pragmatic than Pak ever was or will be with its foreign policies. If it sees an advantage for itself, Iran will use it.
 
Agreed. But Iran is more pragmatic than Pak ever was or will be with its foreign policies. If it sees an advantage for itself, Iran will use it.
BLA,BRA operates on BOTH sides of the border and a hypothetical BLA land will create problems for Iran and Afghanistan
 
That is an assumption.. we can deal with the what ever tactical and strategic threat environment presents itself, there is no need for us to be dependent on any state for our own security.
So in other words you are supporting the disintegration of Pakistan. I was never wrong when I say India is our mortal enemy.

@WebMaster @Horus @Jango: What is the policy for those who openly support disintegration of Pakistan and terrorism?

It has nothing to do with flame baiting. Why should India keep quiet when there is moral support for Kashmir? And feel free to recommend me for a ban. Why is it that when you advocate moral support for Kashmir it is valid and when we decide to advocate moral support for Balochistan it irks you?By the way, in case you missed the "If you cause trouble in Kashmir" part.

I too have long believed in Pakistan acting as a buffer state. But, that is valid only to your NWFP province. Not the one facing Iran. The PA is our first line of defence against the Talibs and that is a valid point. But expecting us to keep quiet and do nothing while the fire in Kashmir is started is foolhardy. There will be a response and that reponse will be in Balochistan. This is practically what will happen. Divert your attention to internal problems, just the way you tried to do to us. We have done it once in Bangladesh. 65 led to 71. In the same way, more trouble in Kashmir will lead to more trouble in another location. And this is quid pro quo.

Now, you may decide to bury head in the sand and say, ban the chap, but, how else do you think is going to be the response.
You are not advocating 'moral support' instead active intervention just like you did back in 1971 in East Pakistan, and as you did in Sri Lanka by arming and supporting terrorist LTTE. At-least stick to your earlier stand if you have no fear of ban.
 
No Indian or Pakistani can be wrong when he feels that the other side is an enemy.
Indeed but senior members on Pakistani side do not support disintegration of India or terrorism rather condemn. That wonderful gesture is found on the other side.
 
Suggest you revisit the part in bold. I have seen countless posts that suggest the contrary

We Indians & Pakistanis are hard wired thus.
This was meant specifically for someone who probably have got it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom