FC-31 v2.0 First flight 2016.12.23

Discussion in 'Pakistan Air Force' started by Development C&P, Dec 23, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. LeGenD

    LeGenD SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2006
    Messages:
    3,251
    Ratings:
    +4 / 2,364 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    As a software engineer, you should be able to understand my point-of-view.

    My point is that since F-35 aircraft are under development, they are being subjected to rigorous trails to figure out potential issues and shortcomings in their design and performance. Objective is to make sure that end-products are mature and stable. In short, Trial end Error approach.

    An software engineer understands the logic of Trial and Error.

    As for the problem you identified, you sure that F-35 aircraft do not have active on-board sensors?

    Sensor Fusion

    The F-35’s advanced sensor fusion enables pilots to draw on information from all of their on-board sensors to create a single integrated picture of the battlefield. All of the information gathered is then automatically shared with other pilots and command and control operating centers on their network using the most modern datalinks. These secure datalinks, such as the Multifunction Advanced Data Link (MADL), will enable pilots to share data with other strike aircraft as well as other airborne, surface and ground-based platforms required to perform assigned missions.


    From here: https://www.f35.com/about/capabilities/missionsystems

    If F-35 aircraft does not have on-board sensors, then how come its sensor fusion capability works?

    Detailed explanations in following links:

    http://www.aviationtoday.com/av/military/F-35-Integrated-Sensor-Suite-Lethal-Combination_1145.html

    http://www.sldinfo.com/whitepapers/the-f-35-and-advanced-sensor-fusion/

    As for the threat of hacking, you can expect adequate security arrangements or fail-safes to be incorporated (if not already). This is not a toy, this is product of war and several countries are involved in its design. These thoughts come to mind of every developer naturally, my friend.

    As I said, something is always amiss in arguments of the critics in regards to capabilities of F-35 aircraft.
     
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2017 at 2:55 PM
  2. BHarwana

    BHarwana FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2016
    Messages:
    339
    Ratings:
    +0 / 203 / -1
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    You need sensor fusion when you don't have on board sensors. this is the first point.
    You will need a single integrated picture when you are sourcing data from different sources.
    This is just a fighter jet. It can crash it be shot down. DNC is their Government and they admitted that hack.

    5th gen is not a fighter jet please understand. It is a war tactic. It is an entire strategy. A single F 35 is supported by at least 6 aerial platforms.
     
  3. LeGenD

    LeGenD SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2006
    Messages:
    3,251
    Ratings:
    +4 / 2,364 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    WTH?

    F-35 has following on-board sensors:-

    1. AESA radar system (active)
    2. DAS (active)
    3. EOTS (passive)
    4. The Electronic Warfare Suite (active)
    5. CNI (passive)

    Even more perhaps.

    Now, what is sensor fusion technology?

    F-35 aircraft has an on-board sensor fusion engine that enables communication and data-sharing between all of the on-board sensors of the aircraft in order to provide superior feedback to the pilot (inside the cockpit) to enhance his situational awareness. In-fact, the F-35 aircraft is like a sensor fusion engine on the whole. This enables an F-35 aircraft to communicate and share its data with another F-35 aircraft in real-time without use of radios. Network-centric warfare in the nutshell.

    Before pilots had access to a usable data link, which allows ships and aircraft to share sensor and other data, information about the pilot’s surroundings and other aircraft or ships was ‘talked out’ on the radio or in coded shorthand. The pilot had to build a mental picture of what was going on.

    [​IMG]

    Today, “a variety of sensors allow us to see everything around us with great precision,” Flynn said. “The plane’s computer system synthesizes and prioritizes the information and tells me who the good and bad guys are. That makes my workload less than was ever was the case in any generation of fighter before.”


    Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/brand-connect/the-f-35-how-it-works/

    The blue part is sensor fusion technology in the works.

    For full understanding: http://www.sldinfo.com/whitepapers/the-f-35-and-advanced-sensor-fusion/

    You are not checking the sources that I am citing, are you?

    See above.

    I don't recall any instance of hacking of the software system used in F-35 aircraft.

    The hacking efforts were focused on intrusions in DoD systems to steal classified information about some American aircraft and weapon systems. Edward Snowden revealed this in one of his leaks.

    Yes, hacking of a software system is a valid concern. However, we don't know much about security measures adopted for F-35 software. Information on this matter might remain limited due to its sensitivity.

    Oh I get this fully.

    In-fact, I stated this much earlier in this thread.
     
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2017 at 6:03 PM
  4. BHarwana

    BHarwana FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2016
    Messages:
    339
    Ratings:
    +0 / 203 / -1
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Please explain me the advantage of F35 over F15

    A fighter jet with AESA is not stealth it can be shot down with ARM missile

    USA should buy FC 31 that is a more better option.
     
  5. Beast

    Beast ELITE MEMBER

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    9,723
    Ratings:
    +5 / 22,233 / -22
    Country:
    China
    Location:
    China
    Lol.. Fancy you using a second rate locomotive to gauge the overall of Chinese manufacturing? May I ask you how much can Pakistan afford for a world class bullet train?

    Can I say if you have $25000 just to buy a toyota and you want it to have the performance and quality of Ferrari?

    I think you have a perception problem and terrible mentality problem of very unrealistic view. You know nothing of China higher end manufacturing and your conclusion is solely based on your negative biased view. You can continue cling onto your white master and want Pakistan to be blackmailed by them and do their bidding. Thankfully the people at top don't have a narrow view like you.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  6. LeGenD

    LeGenD SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2006
    Messages:
    3,251
    Ratings:
    +4 / 2,364 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Ziyang CSR Universal develops 2nd-rate locomotives? This is the company: http://www.cccme.org.cn/shop/cccme3798/index.aspx

    Any alternative in mind?

    Yes, purchasing power is an issue. Otherwise, we might have chosen to induct locomotives from another country that has reputation of developing quality stuff. It doesn't have to be a bullet train to be high-quality though.

    Now what I find alarming (at personal capacity) is that even expensive Chinese products are known to give under stressful conditions or have relatively shorter life-spans in comparison to similar stuff from some developed countries. This is the situation with consumer items so far, based on my experience. I cannot say much regarding military-grade stuff but I expect it to be better in quality than consumer level stuff on average.

    Nonetheless, I am not keen to declare any Chinese product as (world-class) yet. Perhaps, China will surprise me at some point in the future.

    Low-cost is central to Chinese business drive so far. A product is low-cost when it lacks in features and/or has poor quality components. Anybody who has a long history of purchasing computer products, will corroborate my stance regarding this matter.

    Anyways, I am not a vehement critic of Chinese products. I want the best for me, just like anybody else. If China can deliver, why not. So don't take my remarks in negative sense. An honest insight from a customer is better then a fake one.
     
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2017 at 6:37 PM
  7. Beast

    Beast ELITE MEMBER

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    9,723
    Ratings:
    +5 / 22,233 / -22
    Country:
    China
    Location:
    China
    qutoing some second rated company and claim its the best of what China manufacturing is all what you do? Ziyang? I never heard of such small fried company in China, seriously. I can bet it's Pakistan too cash scrapped and then decide to look for this small time company to buy locomotive.

    Let me show you what the best China has.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CSR_Sifang_Co_Ltd.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  8. The Accountant

    The Accountant FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2016
    Messages:
    570
    Ratings:
    +4 / 622 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    :offpost:
     
  9. LeGenD

    LeGenD SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2006
    Messages:
    3,251
    Ratings:
    +4 / 2,364 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    I did not assert that Ziyang CSR Universal is the best locomotive manufacturing company in China. My point is that it is not an amateur brand in this business.

    Nonetheless, if CRRC Sifang Co is the best brand in locomotive manufacturing business in China, then fair enough and thanks for the suggestion. I am not in the position to comment on the quality of its products.
     
  10. The Eagle

    The Eagle RESEARCH & DEV

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2015
    Messages:
    3,365
    Ratings:
    +65 / 6,483 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    No more off-topic discussion. We can agree to disagree without insults and personal attacks or bashing etc. Criticism is healthy when it is all about to push someone for further growth/development but the same thing utilized for bashing and demonizing is harmful hence against the productivity and learning. Hopefully, we may refrain from as such so the quality could be maintained w.r.t. valued discussion.

    @TaimiKhan @Oscar kindly clean the thread.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  11. LeGenD

    LeGenD SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2006
    Messages:
    3,251
    Ratings:
    +4 / 2,364 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Seriously? :rolleyes: :disagree:

    You need to watch your attitude and keep your jabs to yourself. I am a strong advocate of friendly relations with China at state level. So don't accuse me of conspiring against Chinese on the basis of my consumer-level insight which is honest and straightforward.

    My perception is grounded on my experiences with products that I have purchased during my lifetime. Made in China has not impressed me so far (like it or not). Take this from someone who has a personal computer at home and used to be in retail business on top of that. If you cannot appreciate an honest insight from another individual then you need to look at the mirror before commenting on these matters. Don't make this political.

    People at the top know what they are doing (and they are not sticking to Chinese in every domain). We buy stuff from any source that is reliable in its dealings with us. Sometimes, we are short on resources and have limited options to choose from, so China caters in this situation.
     
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2017 at 7:24 PM
  12. BHarwana

    BHarwana FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2016
    Messages:
    339
    Ratings:
    +0 / 203 / -1
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Look from your computer and the most reliable smart phone every thing is made in China. No matter where ever a thing is designed in the end it has a label made in China.

    In regards to FC 31 as this thread is for a jet and not commodities. FC 31 is a better option for Pakistan than you beloved F 35.
    Reasons FC 31 is a stand alone unit with every sensor on board. It is a compact jet. It is a twin engine jet. Plus China provides tech we require. Things we need to keep in mind is the SU 30 and Raffy. Which currently is in enemy hands and FC 31 is more than enough for the issue. FC 31 is way more cheaper and we need to spend more on development than Purchase. Currently Jf 17 is picking up orders and we will make money from it and for Pakistan FC 31 is a better route as China is a more reliable partner than USA. USA has a history of compromising our national security for it's own interest but China has always help us and Protected us and the Chinese tech is not restricted to Pakistan under any conditions war or no war money or no money. So our path and future with China is better.
    Pakistan likes compact fighter jets it is a good decision of Pakistan and world is copping Pakistan on that decision that is why F 22 was ditched for F35. So FC 31 in my noob understanding is a better jet. It has stealth Range Speed and agility with a much low price tag.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  13. Basel

    Basel SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2013
    Messages:
    4,838
    Ratings:
    +1 / 2,814 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    5th gen is not about pulling Gs, that part of your post shows how much knowledge you have.

    Although West is not friendly with Pakistan as Turkey and Chia are, but it does not mean we don't give them credit where they deserve, J-20 will only become true 5th gen till it has engine on par of F-22 engines, you can't have 5th gen flying with old engine tech.
     
  14. DavidSling

    DavidSling SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2013
    Messages:
    2,099
    Ratings:
    +6 / 2,941 / -3
    Country:
    Israel
    Location:
    Israel
    The days of dog fights are over, and situational awareness is the key for successful mission, in air, in sea, in ground and underground
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  15. Basel

    Basel SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2013
    Messages:
    4,838
    Ratings:
    +1 / 2,814 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Good post, Pakistan should work with China and Turkey to built it's future frontline 5th gen jet, both brings their tech, resources and influence and can work together in Pakistan to develop a jet which can be useful for China and Turkey too.

    I know that, G's are important but not that as mentioned in post I responded to.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.