What's new

COMAC - ARJ-21 : milestone - facts and current performance

BoQ77

BANNED
Joined
Jul 29, 2012
Messages
8,704
Reaction score
0
Country
Viet Nam
Location
Viet Nam
As we know, COMAC ARJ21 declared enter the revenue service since 28 June 2016, while the delivery to Chengdu Airline since Nov. 2015

It can fly, everybody knows that, but It must bring the revenue, profit for the airliners to compete with other models, other airliners. That's the basis for next batch orders, new orders.

It's surprise that, at this moment, this ARJ21 only flies a return flight between Chengdu - Shanghai, per 2 days.
Delivered in November 2015
Enter service in 28 June 2016

11/Aug : Chengdu- Shanghai
11/Aug : Shanghai - Chengdu
13/Aug: Chengdu - Shanghai
13/Aug: Shanghai - Chengdu

flight time : about above 2 hours

Anyone saw that a very low rate in operating a route ?
or they ( COMAC ) are still testing the aircraft ?

as we learn that Chengdu Airline actually is COMAC's subsidiary

In March 2009, Sichuan Airlines invested 200 million RMB (30 million USD) in United Eagle Airlines, thus holding 76 percent of the shares. In late 2009, these shares were sold to Chinese aircraft manufacturer COMAC and to Chengdu Communications Investment Group. Following this ownership change, United Eagle Airlines placed a firm order for 30 COMAC ARJ21s , with the first one to be delivered in late 2010 ( actual delivery in late 2015 ). On January 23, 2010, the airline was renamed Chengdu Airlines.
 
Last edited:
China just flew its first passenger jet — and it’s a clunker

By Alberto Riva

June 29, 2016 | 1:35 am
Tuesday was a big day for Chinese aviation. The first passenger jet built in China, the Comac ARJ-21, made its first commercial flight with launch customer Chengdu Airlines, from Chengdu in central China to Shanghai, a two-hour flight that went reportedly without a hitch, with 70 passengers on the 90-seat twinjet.

The new plane "offers valuable experience for China's aviation industry, especially in the large civil aircraft area," Wu Xingshi, the ARJ-21's former chief designer, told the Xinhua news agency. And that's what the jet will end up being: a way for China to gain experience, on the way to possibly competing one day with Western manufacturers of civilian airplanes. But as a commercial proposition, the ARJ-21 is a failure.

State-owned Comac has corraled around 300 orders for the aircraft, almost all from Chinese companies except for a few in Asia and Africa — Laos, Indonesia, Myanmar and the Republic of Congo — plus an order for five from US-based leasing company GECAS, a division of General Electric, which will then lease them out to airlines.

Almost a decade behind schedule, the ARJ-21 is a sales flop compared to Western jets of similar size. The Brazilian-made Embraer E-Jet family has won around 1,500 orders; Canada's Bombardier CRJ planes got more than 800. Both seat up to 100 people on journeys typically limited to a couple hours' flight, a category commonly known as "regional jets."

untitled-article-1467137014-body-image-1467137508.jpg


The smallest jets from Boeing and Airbus, the US and European giants that have a near-absolute duopoly on planes bigger than 100 seats, sell in the thousands. While not directly comparable to the ARJ, they show that established players in the passenger transport market are on a scale that Comac is nowhere near matching; in 14 years since the launch of the program, it has built just six ARJ-21s. Boeing builds six 737s in one and a half day on average.

Granted, the ARJ-21 has a list price estimated at around $30 million, way cheaper than similar Western jets. But it's also heavier, which means it burns more fuel. And Comac is an unproven entity; the only thing airlines outside of China really know about it is that it's taken a long time to put its first jet into the hands of its first customer (which also is a subsidiary of Comac itself, by the way, not an independent airline.)

The ARJ-21 took eight years from first flight to entry into service, and only six of them have been produced since 2008. The Boeing 787, for example, needed less than two years, for a far more complex, bigger airplane.

The Chinese market for commercial airplanes is huge and growing, and so far it's been a gold mine for planemakers — Western ones, that is. Boeing estimates that Chinese airlines will need to buy more than 6,000 airplanes between 2014 and 2034, worth almost $1 trillion. Most of them will be built by companies based outside China.

Comac is learning painstakingly to build planes that may one day get a slice of that pie, but right now, its technology is decades behind — and looks like a dicey proposition for export. Its current flagship product is not even allowed to fly in the West. The ARJ-21 does not have a certificate from the US Federal Aviation Administration or from its European equivalent saying that it's fit to carry passengers commercially, and so it can fly only in China and some countries that recognize Chinese certification.

Frequent flyers and aviation geeks who spot an ARJ may not even recognize it for the pioneer it is, or even do a double take: it looks just like a shrunken DC-9, a 50-year old American veteran whose production line closed years ago.

It is, in fact, basically a smaller copy of the last version of the DC-9. Its electronics are made by Western firms; its engines are straight-up American, made by General Electric (something that also helps explain why GE's aircraft-leasing arm has bought a handful. In comparison, it has thousands of Western planes.)

untitled-article-1467137014-body-image-1467138022.jpg


An MD-80, derived from the DC-9 and similar to the Comac ARJ-21, in 2001 at the Oslo airport, Norway. Photo by Jan Ovind/Scanpix/EPA

Even if the ARJ-21 eventually turns out to be a relative success, it's a small plane for short flights; no one is seriously challenging the Euro-American lock on big jets that seat hundreds, and on the profits from selling them. (The Russians are trying, but the general consensus is they won't have much better luck abroad than the Chinese.)

China is now betting hard on the C919, another Comac product roughly twice the size of the ARJ-21 in terms of passengers carried, meant to compete directly with the Airbus A320 and Boeing 737, the most widely sold passenger jets in history. But the C919 hasn't even flown yet, and while Comac says it will take a lot less time to bring it to service than its smaller sibling, it hasn't yet won serious orders for it outside China either.

The conclusion is simple: for quite a long time, the only way for people to fly on a Chinese-built airliner will be to go to China and find one of the few routes it will cover.

"China matters more than ever as an aircraft market," wrote Richard Aboulafia, who heads aviation research firm Teal Group. "It matters less than ever as an aircraft producer."
 
China just flew its first passenger jet — and it’s a clunker

By Alberto Riva

June 29, 2016 | 1:35 am
Tuesday was a big day for Chinese aviation. The first passenger jet built in China, the Comac ARJ-21, made its first commercial flight with launch customer Chengdu Airlines, from Chengdu in central China to Shanghai, a two-hour flight that went reportedly without a hitch, with 70 passengers on the 90-seat twinjet.

The new plane "offers valuable experience for China's aviation industry, especially in the large civil aircraft area," Wu Xingshi, the ARJ-21's former chief designer, told the Xinhua news agency. And that's what the jet will end up being: a way for China to gain experience, on the way to possibly competing one day with Western manufacturers of civilian airplanes. But as a commercial proposition, the ARJ-21 is a failure.

State-owned Comac has corraled around 300 orders for the aircraft, almost all from Chinese companies except for a few in Asia and Africa — Laos, Indonesia, Myanmar and the Republic of Congo — plus an order for five from US-based leasing company GECAS, a division of General Electric, which will then lease them out to airlines.

Almost a decade behind schedule, the ARJ-21 is a sales flop compared to Western jets of similar size. The Brazilian-made Embraer E-Jet family has won around 1,500 orders; Canada's Bombardier CRJ planes got more than 800. Both seat up to 100 people on journeys typically limited to a couple hours' flight, a category commonly known as "regional jets."

untitled-article-1467137014-body-image-1467137508.jpg


The smallest jets from Boeing and Airbus, the US and European giants that have a near-absolute duopoly on planes bigger than 100 seats, sell in the thousands. While not directly comparable to the ARJ, they show that established players in the passenger transport market are on a scale that Comac is nowhere near matching; in 14 years since the launch of the program, it has built just six ARJ-21s. Boeing builds six 737s in one and a half day on average.

Granted, the ARJ-21 has a list price estimated at around $30 million, way cheaper than similar Western jets. But it's also heavier, which means it burns more fuel. And Comac is an unproven entity; the only thing airlines outside of China really know about it is that it's taken a long time to put its first jet into the hands of its first customer (which also is a subsidiary of Comac itself, by the way, not an independent airline.)

The ARJ-21 took eight years from first flight to entry into service, and only six of them have been produced since 2008. The Boeing 787, for example, needed less than two years, for a far more complex, bigger airplane.

The Chinese market for commercial airplanes is huge and growing, and so far it's been a gold mine for planemakers — Western ones, that is. Boeing estimates that Chinese airlines will need to buy more than 6,000 airplanes between 2014 and 2034, worth almost $1 trillion. Most of them will be built by companies based outside China.

Comac is learning painstakingly to build planes that may one day get a slice of that pie, but right now, its technology is decades behind — and looks like a dicey proposition for export. Its current flagship product is not even allowed to fly in the West. The ARJ-21 does not have a certificate from the US Federal Aviation Administration or from its European equivalent saying that it's fit to carry passengers commercially, and so it can fly only in China and some countries that recognize Chinese certification.

Frequent flyers and aviation geeks who spot an ARJ may not even recognize it for the pioneer it is, or even do a double take: it looks just like a shrunken DC-9, a 50-year old American veteran whose production line closed years ago.

It is, in fact, basically a smaller copy of the last version of the DC-9. Its electronics are made by Western firms; its engines are straight-up American, made by General Electric (something that also helps explain why GE's aircraft-leasing arm has bought a handful. In comparison, it has thousands of Western planes.)

untitled-article-1467137014-body-image-1467138022.jpg


An MD-80, derived from the DC-9 and similar to the Comac ARJ-21, in 2001 at the Oslo airport, Norway. Photo by Jan Ovind/Scanpix/EPA

Even if the ARJ-21 eventually turns out to be a relative success, it's a small plane for short flights; no one is seriously challenging the Euro-American lock on big jets that seat hundreds, and on the profits from selling them. (The Russians are trying, but the general consensus is they won't have much better luck abroad than the Chinese.)

China is now betting hard on the C919, another Comac product roughly twice the size of the ARJ-21 in terms of passengers carried, meant to compete directly with the Airbus A320 and Boeing 737, the most widely sold passenger jets in history. But the C919 hasn't even flown yet, and while Comac says it will take a lot less time to bring it to service than its smaller sibling, it hasn't yet won serious orders for it outside China either.

The conclusion is simple: for quite a long time, the only way for people to fly on a Chinese-built airliner will be to go to China and find one of the few routes it will cover.

"China matters more than ever as an aircraft market," wrote Richard Aboulafia, who heads aviation research firm Teal Group. "It matters less than ever as an aircraft producer."

Posting such loser article will not change the fact our success is control by ourselves. China is the largest aviation market and all airliners are state owned. We can control what aircraft to buy, we can take the losses for longer successful future.
End of the day, the money spend on ARJ-21 and C919 goes back on bulk to our own Chinese aviation industries and our own Chinese designer and technician.

Just like Indian keep buying foreign fighter jets will not have any benefit on their country industries grown.

Comac may not grown as big as Boeing and Airbus in next 20 years. But it will sure cement itself in Chinese aviation industries.
 
Posting such loser article will not change the fact our success is control by ourselves. China is the largest aviation market and all airliners are state owned. We can control what aircraft to buy, we can take the losses for longer successful future.
End of the day, the money spend on ARJ-21 and C919 goes back on bulk to our own Chinese aviation industries and our own Chinese designer and technician.

Just like Indian keep buying foreign fighter jets will not have any benefit on their country industries grown.

Comac may not grown as big as Boeing and Airbus in next 20 years. But it will sure cement itself in Chinese aviation industries.

Here I agree with you.
 
@waz @Hu Songshan

How long is this troll allowed to CONSISTENTLY post troll thread after throll thread and troll post after troll post before he receives a PERMANENT ban?

Stop giving trolls small bans, get rid of them permanently.

I'm watching, but thing is he is just discussing an article. Counter and post your own my friend.
 
I'm watching, but thing is he is just discussing an article. Counter and post your own my friend.

My post based on the real facts. What is your idea on it? Refer 1st post.
 
Your arguement is weak. It has a 2 months of operation and you expect it to run 24hrs non stop. If not anything for you is a failure? When Vietnam is going to make a passenger jet fit for human to board? Year 2099? :lol:

are you derailing?
It is almost 8 months from the time of delivery.
Could you name reasons after this performance?
I did not criticise anything on it. Just doubt that actually the aircraft still under testing
 
Last edited:
I'm watching, but thing is he is just discussing an article. Counter and post your own my friend.

Discussing an article?

He is a very clever troll that masquerades flame baiting as 'just discussing an article'.

He is not interested in discussion whatsoever.

You will eventually realise what this guy's real agenda is.
 
@waz this guy outright is obviously lying and trolling here. Trying to misled and spread false lies by faking ARJ-21 enter service for 8months which in fact is only 2 months as prove. When challenged still putting on a brave front. :sick:

My posts state very clear, and has not a word as you put it to my mouth.
 
My posts state very clear, and has not a word as you put it to my mouth.
Same as my words. If delivery can be same as operation then F-35 serve be operational already..

You are trying to lie by giving false impression ARJ-21 already in service for 8 months. Obviously you are trolling.
 

Back
Top Bottom