What's new

China, Pakistan reach secret nuclear reactor deal for Pakistan

Karachi to have another N-plant | The Nation

This news is from last year and tells us everything about our Civilian nuclear power projects. According to this 1000MW is supposed to be built to replace Kanup-1 in karachi. Americans really suck at journalism.
kanup 1 isnt going anywhere for a while it will stay until other projects will complete
and journalism all over the world saucks
 
U.S. says deal violates international accord

nuclear-power_lea_s640x492.jpg



China and Pakistan reached a formal agreement last month to construct a third nuclear reactor at Chashma that the Obama administration says will violate Beijing’s promises under an international anti-nuclear weapons accord.

According to U.S. intelligence
and diplomatic officials, the secret agreement for the Chashma 3 reactor was signed in Beijing during the visit by a delegation from the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission from Feb. 15 to 18.

The agreement calls for the state-run China National Nuclear Corp. (CNNC) to construct a 1,000-megawatt power plant at Chashma, located in the northern province of Punjab, where two earlier Chinese reactors were built.

China’s government last month issued an internal notice to officials within its nuclear establishment and to regional political leaders urging care to avoid any leaks of information about the nuclear sale that Beijing expects will be controversial, said officials who spoke on condition of anonymity.

The reactor deal had been in the works for several years and prompted high-level U.S. government efforts to block the sale because of concerns it will boost Pakistan’s nuclear weapons program.

The CNNC is China’s main nuclear weapons producer and has been linked in the past to Pakistan’s nuclear arms program by U.S. intelligence agencies. CNNC sold thousands of ring magnets to Pakistan during the 1990s that were used in centrifuges that produced highly enriched uranium for weapons.

Additionally, recent U.S. intelligence reports indicate that China, which supplied Pakistan with nuclear weapons design data and technology, is in the process of modernizing Islamabad’s nuclear arsenal, which is estimated to contain as many as 110 warheads.

The arms cooperation is said to include development of a new warhead for Pakistan’s growing missile arsenal as well as assistance in reprocessing spent nuclear fuel.

A Congressional Research Service report published Feb. 13 stated, “Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal probably consists of approximately 90-110 nuclear warheads, although it could be larger.”

Islamabad is producing fissile material, adding to related production facilities, and deploying additional delivery vehicles,” the CRS report said. “These steps could enable Pakistan to undertake both quantitative and qualitative improvements to its nuclear arsenal.”

The report warned that spent fuel from Pakistan’s Karachi and Chashma nuclear power plants are vulnerable to theft or attack.

Pakistan produced one of the most dangerous cases of nuclear proliferation in the early 2000s when weapons technology was supplied to Libya, Iran, and North Korea by the supplier group led by Pakistani nuclear scientist A.Q. Khan.

The Obama administration has not publicly contested the nuclear cooperation between the two countries in the past to avoid upsetting U.S. covert efforts against Islamist terrorism in the region.

The Beijing-Islamabad nuclear cooperation also has been limited as a result of U.S. efforts to win Chinese support for sanctions on Iran for its illicit nuclear program.

The new reactor sale also will undermine the Nuclear Suppliers Group, a voluntary association with no enforcement mechanisms that is viewed as a key tool in the administration’s effort to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons.

China in 2004 joined the group and agreed not to sell additional reactors to Pakistan beyond the two reactors sold earlier. China is not permitted under NSG guidelines to sell nuclear goods to any country that is not part of the International Atomic Energy Agency.

Two U.S. officials confirmed that the Chashma reactor deal was finally reached.

Spokesmen for the Chinese and Pakistani embassies could not be reached for comment.


A State Department official declined to provide details of the sale but said it is not permitted under the U.S. understanding of China’s admission to the nuclear group. That understanding is that China would not sell additional reactors to Pakistan’s Chashma complex.

“Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) participating governments have discussed the issue of China’s expansion of nuclear cooperation with Pakistan at the last several NSG plenary sessions,” the official said.

“We remain concerned that a transfer of new reactors at Chashma appears to extend beyond the cooperation that was ‘grandfathered’ in when China was approved for membership in the NSG.”

The administration is expected to protest the sale at an upcoming NSG meeting in June.

Pakistan does not have full-scope IAEA safeguards in place, something that is required before China could provide the third Chashma reactor.

The 46-member NSG was formed in 1974 and its stated mission is to “contribute to the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons through the implementation of guidelines for nuclear exports and nuclear related exports.”

China agreed as part of its NSG membership that it would limit future reactor sales to Pakistan to the Chashma 1 and Chashma 2 reactors.


The Chinese also urged the Pakistani delegation from the Atomic Energy Commission to play down the recent transfer of control to a Chinese company of the key port of Gwadar that U.S. officials said likely will be used by Chinese warships for port calls.

The port is close to the Persian Gulf, where some 20 percent of the world’s oil is produced.

The deal for Chashma was announced in July 2010 during the visit to China by Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari. However, the announced arrangement was limited to a memorandum of understanding.

source:
China, Pakistan reach secret nuclear reactor deal for Pakistan - Washington Times

It is mainly for power generation not for weapons and I think KRL,PAEC and China should have at least now do JV in Thorium based reactors which they should have start working on in 1990s or 2000s. I am sure that there is sometime left and we can make the most of it now.

thoriumCycleNielsen.gif

thorium-fueled.jpg

LFTR_3.png
Molten_Salt_Reactor._400gif.gif


And we can add about 50-70% of electricity out of our total requirement from it.

archibald_energy_security_874.png

thoriumVsUranium.jpg


thorium.png

small_fuji.jpg
 
USA newspaper are producing crap stuff now a days.
2 nuclear power plants (C-1 and C-2) are already operating at chashma, where C-3 and C-4 are under construction, which will be completed in 2015 and 2016 respectively. All these are NPPs, meant for power generation under IAEA safeguards, nothing special and secret about these NPPs.
 
Not so secret anymore ehhh? If something would have been happenig behind closed doors, rest assured there would have been no news. This is Washington times at its best since it has been too long no news on Pakistan's nuclear program has been published in the western media.

Yup spot on bro.

An empty vassal makes much noise!!!!!!!!
 
If you don't know anything about nuclear power, please don't talk. If you do, elaborate. Don't give one liners like that and run off.
Does one have to be a nuclear scientist to know what happened at Chernobyl?

BTW, from where is gov.t of Pakistan going to get the $$ needed for the maintenance of all of these reactors? American aid?? They can hardly fund the Iran-Pakistan pipeline.
 
It is mainly for power generation not for weapons and I think KRL,PAEC and China should have at least now do JV in Thorium based reactors which they should have start working on in 1990s or 2000s. I am sure that there is sometime left and we can make the most of it now.
A great deal is out there on MSRs. However, the long-term safety and utility of these designs are questionable. I don't know that anybody has surmounted one of the practical problems the U.S. discovered with this design, that excess tritium production leads to degeneration of reactor physics and embrittlement in reactor alloys - and that the larger the MSR, the greater these problems become. Then there are the corrosion issues...
 
If you ever made only one good friend in life, it will be China.
 
A great deal is out there on MSRs. However, the long-term safety and utility of these designs are questionable. I don't know that anybody has surmounted one of the practical problems the U.S. discovered with this design, that excess tritium production leads to degeneration of reactor physics and embrittlement in reactor alloys - and that the larger the MSR, the greater these problems become. Then there are the corrosion issues...

I think KRL and PAEC should have also started up a two plant having three reactors of about 350MWs at Karachi like near Korangi waters and the second at Hawksbay and return the 80MW KANNUP reactor to Canada and gain back money.
 
He is refering to the the radiation leakage from the russian chernobyle npp, which killed hundreds of people. With the sea levels rising alarmingly each year, any npp in karachi runs the risk of meeting the same fate as did a japanese npp in the recent past.
 
It is mainly for power generation not for weapons and I think KRL,PAEC and China should have at least now do JV in Thorium based reactors which they should have start working on in 1990s or 2000s. I am sure that there is sometime left and we can make the most of it now.

thoriumCycleNielsen.gif

thorium-fueled.jpg

LFTR_3.png
Molten_Salt_Reactor._400gif.gif


And we can add about 50-70% of electricity out of our total requirement from it.

archibald_energy_security_874.png

thoriumVsUranium.jpg


thorium.png

small_fuji.jpg

Reported for posting to much Science stuff
Think about commerce students man
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom