What's new

China and India to oust Russia from Syria

Joined
Aug 3, 2016
Messages
142
Reaction score
-3
Country
India
Location
India
58712.jpeg

Bashar al-Assad's Syria is not isolated anymore. Russia, China and India have supported the Syrian president in many ways, and it is clear that Syria is close to the end of the war, while the powers that be get ready to snatch up pieces of the Syrian pie. There is no friendship in geopolitics, and Russia comes across serious competition in Syria.

Syria no longer isolated
  • Print version
  • conflict in Syria, and the leaders agreed that terrorism was a global problem, said dnaindia.com with reference to diplomatic sources. Akbar said that the time to restore the destroyed Syrian cities would soon come, and Assad invited India to participate in their reconstruction.

    India's interest in the stability in West Asia stems from the fact that more than seven million Indian nationals work in the region. Their safety remains a major concern for the government, in addition to the country's energy needs, the website said.

    Beijing and New Delhi engage into Syrian competition
    It is interesting, however, that a year ago, New Delhi did not think about either Indian migrants or many joint projects in the region. Some of them were large-scale projects, such as, for example, the Tishreen hydroelectric station under the control of Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd (BHEL), or the Steel Plant in Hama province. Now New Delhi intends to finish those projects, if Damascus guarantees safety.

    The above-mentioned prospects suggest that the war in Syria is nearing its end. Moreover, it is clear who is going to promote their businesses in the post-war Syria. The changes were made possible after Turkey admitted Bashar al-Assad's presence in the transition government. The Americans no longer want to topple Assad either. Arab monarchies, however, still remain opposed to Assad's role in the post-war Syria.

    Last week, China expressed its support for the Syrian president. China's policy will be aimed at strengthening cooperation with Syria in the fight against the threat of terrorism, the chief of the Office of International Military Cooperation of the Central Military Commission (CMC) of China Guan Youfei said. He said that China was going to strengthen anti-terrorist policy against the militants in Syria to thereby support the Assad government.

    Syria is a grateful friend. Assad supports Beijing on the South China Sea dispute. Damascus supports India on the issue of Kashmir by claiming that Kashmir remains an integral part of India. As for Russia, Assad supports Russia's reunification with the Crimea.

    Moscow has to do all the "dirty work"
    As we can see, the ongoing conflict in Syria is no longer seen as the conflict with Bashar Assad, the "outcast." The Syrian conflict has now evolved into the geopolitical struggle against radical Islamists.

    The West, Turkey and Arab monarchies are not likely to be among those who will be sharing pieces of the Syrian pie. The pieces will be distributed between Russia, China and India. Beijing and New Delhi have something that Moscow does not have - billions of dollars in investment. Moscow is waging war in Syria, but Beijing and New Delhi are not. Russia bears political responsibility, and they do not. Thus, the Russians will do all "the dirty and hard work", whereas the Chinese and the Indians will enjoy the results.

    Moreover, they will be able to attract Iran and Turkey to the reconstruction of Syria, regardless of who comes to power in Damascus after Bashar al-Assad. This is quite possible indeed, given China's past experiences in Africa and Latin America.

    Russia should not put all eggs in one basket in Syria. Russia should negotiate and promote mutually beneficial economic projects, otherwise Russia will be shown the door because "the Moor has done his duty."

    "The recent trilateral meeting of the presidents of Russia, Iran and Azerbaijan has given a new impetus to the implementation of the North-South transport corridor," Boris Volkhonsky, deputy head of the center for Asia and the Middle East at RISI told Pravda.Ru. "Syria is not far from this corridor, which should become a center for the integration of the vast region, including the Middle East, the Caucasus, Central Asia, Russia and Northern Europe, with India joining the project.

    "The fact that China has "soft power"- investment - and Russia has "hard power" is not a question of competition - this is a question of complementarity," the expert said.

    Lyuba Lulko
    Pravda.Ru

    Read article on the Russian version of Pravda.Ru

    - See more at: http://www.pravdareport.com/world/a...na_india_russia_syria-0/#sthash.1K397iw6.dpuf
 
58712.jpeg

Bashar al-Assad's Syria is not isolated anymore. Russia, China and India have supported the Syrian president in many ways, and it is clear that Syria is close to the end of the war, while the powers that be get ready to snatch up pieces of the Syrian pie. There is no friendship in geopolitics, and Russia comes across serious competition in Syria.

Syria no longer isolated
  • Print version
  • conflict in Syria, and the leaders agreed that terrorism was a global problem, said dnaindia.com with reference to diplomatic sources. Akbar said that the time to restore the destroyed Syrian cities would soon come, and Assad invited India to participate in their reconstruction.

    India's interest in the stability in West Asia stems from the fact that more than seven million Indian nationals work in the region. Their safety remains a major concern for the government, in addition to the country's energy needs, the website said.

    Beijing and New Delhi engage into Syrian competition
    It is interesting, however, that a year ago, New Delhi did not think about either Indian migrants or many joint projects in the region. Some of them were large-scale projects, such as, for example, the Tishreen hydroelectric station under the control of Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd (BHEL), or the Steel Plant in Hama province. Now New Delhi intends to finish those projects, if Damascus guarantees safety.

    The above-mentioned prospects suggest that the war in Syria is nearing its end. Moreover, it is clear who is going to promote their businesses in the post-war Syria. The changes were made possible after Turkey admitted Bashar al-Assad's presence in the transition government. The Americans no longer want to topple Assad either. Arab monarchies, however, still remain opposed to Assad's role in the post-war Syria.

    Last week, China expressed its support for the Syrian president. China's policy will be aimed at strengthening cooperation with Syria in the fight against the threat of terrorism, the chief of the Office of International Military Cooperation of the Central Military Commission (CMC) of China Guan Youfei said. He said that China was going to strengthen anti-terrorist policy against the militants in Syria to thereby support the Assad government.

    Syria is a grateful friend. Assad supports Beijing on the South China Sea dispute. Damascus supports India on the issue of Kashmir by claiming that Kashmir remains an integral part of India. As for Russia, Assad supports Russia's reunification with the Crimea.

    Moscow has to do all the "dirty work"
    As we can see, the ongoing conflict in Syria is no longer seen as the conflict with Bashar Assad, the "outcast." The Syrian conflict has now evolved into the geopolitical struggle against radical Islamists.

    The West, Turkey and Arab monarchies are not likely to be among those who will be sharing pieces of the Syrian pie. The pieces will be distributed between Russia, China and India. Beijing and New Delhi have something that Moscow does not have - billions of dollars in investment. Moscow is waging war in Syria, but Beijing and New Delhi are not. Russia bears political responsibility, and they do not. Thus, the Russians will do all "the dirty and hard work", whereas the Chinese and the Indians will enjoy the results.

    Moreover, they will be able to attract Iran and Turkey to the reconstruction of Syria, regardless of who comes to power in Damascus after Bashar al-Assad. This is quite possible indeed, given China's past experiences in Africa and Latin America.

    Russia should not put all eggs in one basket in Syria. Russia should negotiate and promote mutually beneficial economic projects, otherwise Russia will be shown the door because "the Moor has done his duty."

    "The recent trilateral meeting of the presidents of Russia, Iran and Azerbaijan has given a new impetus to the implementation of the North-South transport corridor," Boris Volkhonsky, deputy head of the center for Asia and the Middle East at RISI told Pravda.Ru. "Syria is not far from this corridor, which should become a center for the integration of the vast region, including the Middle East, the Caucasus, Central Asia, Russia and Northern Europe, with India joining the project.

    "The fact that China has "soft power"- investment - and Russia has "hard power" is not a question of competition - this is a question of complementarity," the expert said.

    Lyuba Lulko
    Pravda.Ru

    Read article on the Russian version of Pravda.Ru

    - See more at: http://www.pravdareport.com/world/a...na_india_russia_syria-0/#sthash.1K397iw6.dpuf
bullshit
but even interesting coming from Pravada
China and India are clearly not going to cooperate in syria even if they engaged in it
which right now is unlikely
but that does not seems the case in near future
 
No we are not ousting anyone.

Russia is very much needed there and they have far more combat experience in an expeditionary warfare than either of us (India or China) do.

It is best that Russian forces handle the scene the best way they deem it fit.

Most likely Syria is one of those cases where ours, Russia's and China's interests converge.

We will continue supporting the rightful government of Syria over those cannibal FSA terrorists.
 
India won't oust anyone in syria but more or less help bring in stability through investments while Russia and China will help through security. Syria can't afford to lose an ally such as Russia.
 
india already trying ousting Syrian govt by supplying ISIS with explosive but no avail.....

EU report: Seven Indian companies are making parts used in Isis bomb
Seven Indian companies have featured on a list of commercial entities that are reportedly involved in the supply chain of bombs used by Islamic State (Isis/Daesh) terrorists. The research funded by the European Union named 51 commercial entities from 20 countries that are involved in the supply chain of components used by IS to create improvised explosive devices (IEDS).
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/eu-report-seven-indian-companies-are-making-parts-used-isis-bombs-1546181
 
The research funded by the European Union named 51 commercial entities from 20 countries that are involved in the supply chain of components used by IS to create improvised explosive devices (IEDS).

And half the world's intel groups have evidence that NATO-based EU countries openly funded or helped fund terrorism from Taliban-against-Soviets to ISIS today.

What are these morons trying to prove? That we are on ISIS side? :lol:

The whole country is being rearmed to deal with jihadi madness and you're saying we created it?

So if ISIS use some fertilizer or component that originated in our factories but was imported by someone in Syria or some other Arab country and these guys captured it, does it mean we are involved?

Tomorrow if Bangladesh exports components for industry use to Colombia and FARC gets it and uses it to make IEDs and other things, does it mean Bangladesh is backing FARC?

Use your head.
 
india already trying ousting Syrian govt by supplying ISIS with explosive but no avail.....

EU report: Seven Indian companies are making parts used in Isis bomb
Seven Indian companies have featured on a list of commercial entities that are reportedly involved in the supply chain of bombs used by Islamic State (Isis/Daesh) terrorists. The research funded by the European Union named 51 commercial entities from 20 countries that are involved in the supply chain of components used by IS to create improvised explosive devices (IEDS).
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/eu-report-seven-indian-companies-are-making-parts-used-isis-bombs-1546181
Indian companies also make drinking water.

Oh wait a minute ISIS folks also drink water. Hence proved India is involved. How many times do people have to prove your theory wrong.
 
What kind of propaganda is this? china just coordinate in the operation with russia and provide neccessary help. russia will still be the front stage player.
 
What kind of propaganda is this? china just coordinate in the operation with russia and provide neccessary help. russia will still be the front stage player.
RIC is formed in Syria. I know why you gonna move close to Turkey borders (You naughty guys):china:
 

Back
Top Bottom