What's new

Bangladesh lost in sea dispute with India: BNP

Rahul9090

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Feb 21, 2014
Messages
966
Reaction score
-1
Country
India
Location
India
India-Bangladesh01.jpg


The BNP has claimed Bangladesh has lost 6,000 sq km territory in a verdict on maritime boundary dispute with India issued by an international tribunal.
http://www.printfriendly.com/

In an official reaction on Thursday, the party said the government was not sufficiently active to bring the verdict to the favour of Bangladesh.


As a result, it further claimed, India's dominance has been established over the sea.

The BNP also blamed Awami League government for losing the South Talpatti Island.

The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) in Netherlands handed over its verdict on disputed territory in the Bay of Bengal to the two nations on Monday, giving Bangladesh 19,467 sq km out of the estimated total disputed area of 25,602 sq km.

Former water resources minister M Hafizuddin Ahmed, former diplomat Riaz Rahman, BNP leaders Shamsher Mobin Chowdhury and Enam Ahmed Chowdhury held a press conference at the party chairperson's Gulshan office to issue an official reaction.

"We lost our rightful territory in the sea because there were no experienced and skilled representatives at the PCA. We lost South Talpatti Island," Hafiz said.

"We believe the verdict has helped India establish absolute dominance over the Bay of Bengal."

South-Talpatti.jpg

"What the government is saying about a victory is wrong. They said the same thing during the Myanmar boundary resolution, but in reality we lost several oil-gas blocks there," he said.

Bringing up the South Talpatti Island, he said, "That island is an inseparable part of Bangladesh. Bangladesh claimed sovereignty over it during Ziaur Rahman's regime. He had taken the issue of this island to an international level."

"India also claimed sovereignty over the island, and both countries sent warships there. We should not have let go of that island," he told the press.

The government, however, has said that Talpatti no longer exists.

"Although its location has fallen under Indian territory due to the verdict, a large area to the south of that is within our territory now," former foreign minister Dipu Moni said.

The sandbar landform of about 2,500 square kilometres emerged in the bay after a cyclone in 1970. At the end of the ‘90s, it disappeared back into the sea.

At an event earlier in the day, Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina took a potshot at Hafiz's statement on the island.

"They did nothing, but they're trying to find faults with this success. That gentleman should be sent to the sea. Let him find that island, build a house and stay there."

BNP Vice-Chairman Shamsher Mobin Chowdhury said Maritime Affairs Unit Secretary Md Khurshed Alam's claim that the island does did exist was false.

"South Talpatti exists. The maps from 1975 prove that."

"An updated map was published during Ziaur Rahman's time. Now that India has got it, the government is saying it doesn't exist," he said.

"Khurshed used to work in the navy back then. He went to Talpatti with a navy warship. We put a lighthouse there. Now he's saying the opposite."

Hafiz alleged that experienced lawyers and experts were not sent to the PCA on behalf of Bangladesh.

"India sent a judge of its own. But we appointed a judge from Ghana," he said.

"PS Rao played an important role for India. He issued several notes of dissent. But the judge who worked for us didn't issue a single note of dissent."

He said India had sent their attorney general to the hearing but Bangladesh did not.

"We did not utilise an international legal expert like Kamal Hossain or the experienced former secretary KS Morshed," he added.

He responded to an accusation by Awami League leaders that the previous governments did nothing to ensure maritime boundary.

"BNP government formed a separate maritime cell at the foreign ministry, appointed skilled people and sent them to the US for training. We put the cell in their own building."

"We also conducted surveys in the bay," he added.

He called on the government to disclose the details of the verdict.

"We believe there are a lot of discrepancies in the verdict. We know how much we got, but the government is mum about how much India got. The nation is being kept in the dark," Hafiz said.

"A neighbouring state is controlling our internal politics and foreign diplomacy. We want the foreign ministry to give detailed explanations on the verdict," he added.





Bangladesh lost in sea dispute with India: BNP -
bdnews24.com
 
Bangladesh still got alot of maritime boundary. This is planely being greedy.
Earlier they had none, now they got 20k km back. Whats not to be happy about?
 
Bangladesh still got alot of maritime boundary. This is planely being greedy.
Earlier they had none, now they got 20k km back. Whats not to be happy about?
If BD is greedy,india is greedier.
bullies are so generos that they will take anything and later say shut up and be happy for whatever you got back.
 
If BD is greedy,india is greedier.
bullies are so generos that they will take anything and later say shut up and be happy for whatever you got back.
Dude, be thankful it was India, trust me on this.
China has over taken parts of Kashmir and is not ready to go any international court. Even if the land is disputed, it can be peacefully resolved by this way.
Similarly for Pakistan.
What really can Bangladesh do if India refused the decision of this court and take all of 25k km of maritime boundary?
See, being powerful also makes you evil, but you really are not ready to accept the better part of India here, even being more powerful they resolved the dispute peacefully. What the international court decided was rightfully yours. We don't want your share.
If those courts were easily influenceable, China would had happily went to them resolved all disputes.

Bottom-line : The case was resolved by the method of your preference, internationally, I don't see you can make any valid argument that can account for any foul play by India.
Everywhere it is written Bangladesh "Won" the judgement and that is also for a reason except for few stupid articles.

On funnier side, I'm happy most of Indian press suppressed the news, else all Indians would had gotten pissed and would had started flag march over Bangladesh. I don't think you have enough bullets to even kill all Indians. :D :D :D
 
Cononco phlips found 7 TCF gas in the block that we kicked burmese out in 2008. :)
 
A few months back a similar article said how Bangladesh and India will got to court on this issue and many BDeshis said they'd win like they did a few years back............:coffee:
 
Had Bangladesh been with Pakistan, they would not have to face this humiliation from Hindu India. Pakistan would have protected Bangladesh. Remember the defence of the east, lies in the west?
 
India-Bangladesh01.jpg


The BNP has claimed Bangladesh has lost 6,000 sq km territory in a verdict on maritime boundary dispute with India issued by an international tribunal.

In an official reaction on Thursday, the party said the government was not sufficiently active to bring the verdict to the favour of Bangladesh.

As a result, it further claimed, India's dominance has been established over the sea.

The BNP also blamed Awami League government for losing the South Talpatti Island.

The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) in Netherlands handed over its verdict on disputed territory in the Bay of Bengal to the two nations on Monday, giving Bangladesh 19,467 sq km out of the estimated total disputed area of 25,602 sq km.

Former water resources minister M Hafizuddin Ahmed, former diplomat Riaz Rahman, BNP leaders Shamsher Mobin Chowdhury and Enam Ahmed Chowdhury held a press conference at the party chairperson's Gulshan office to issue an official reaction.

"We lost our rightful territory in the sea because there were no experienced and skilled representatives at the PCA. We lost South Talpatti Island," Hafiz said.

"We believe the verdict has helped India establish absolute dominance over the Bay of Bengal."

South-Talpatti.jpg

"What the government is saying about a victory is wrong. They said the same thing during the Myanmar boundary resolution, but in reality we lost several oil-gas blocks there," he said.

Bringing up the South Talpatti Island, he said, "That island is an inseparable part of Bangladesh. Bangladesh claimed sovereignty over it during Ziaur Rahman's regime. He had taken the issue of this island to an international level."

"India also claimed sovereignty over the island, and both countries sent warships there. We should not have let go of that island," he told the press.

The government, however, has said that Talpatti no longer exists.

"Although its location has fallen under Indian territory due to the verdict, a large area to the south of that is within our territory now," former foreign minister Dipu Moni said.

The sandbar landform of about 2,500 square kilometres emerged in the bay after a cyclone in 1970. At the end of the ‘90s, it disappeared back into the sea.

At an event earlier in the day, Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina took a potshot at Hafiz's statement on the island.

"They did nothing, but they're trying to find faults with this success. That gentleman should be sent to the sea. Let him find that island, build a house and stay there."

BNP Vice-Chairman Shamsher Mobin Chowdhury said Maritime Affairs Unit Secretary Md Khurshed Alam's claim that the island does did exist was false.

"South Talpatti exists. The maps from 1975 prove that."

"An updated map was published during Ziaur Rahman's time. Now that India has got it, the government is saying it doesn't exist," he said.

"Khurshed used to work in the navy back then. He went to Talpatti with a navy warship. We put a lighthouse there. Now he's saying the opposite."

Hafiz alleged that experienced lawyers and experts were not sent to the PCA on behalf of Bangladesh.

"India sent a judge of its own. But we appointed a judge from Ghana," he said.

"PS Rao played an important role for India. He issued several notes of dissent. But the judge who worked for us didn't issue a single note of dissent."

He said India had sent their attorney general to the hearing but Bangladesh did not.

"We did not utilise an international legal expert like Kamal Hossain or the experienced former secretary KS Morshed," he added.

He responded to an accusation by Awami League leaders that the previous governments did nothing to ensure maritime boundary.

"BNP government formed a separate maritime cell at the foreign ministry, appointed skilled people and sent them to the US for training. We put the cell in their own building."

"We also conducted surveys in the bay," he added.

He called on the government to disclose the details of the verdict.

"We believe there are a lot of discrepancies in the verdict. We know how much we got, but the government is mum about how much India got. The nation is being kept in the dark," Hafiz said.

"A neighbouring state is controlling our internal politics and foreign diplomacy. We want the foreign ministry to give detailed explanations on the verdict," he added.

Bangladesh lost in sea dispute with India: BNP -
bdnews24.com

Bangladesh certainly did not lose any sea territory because of the Hague verdict. Bangladesh, like any other country would do, sought a compromise with India to split the disputed 25,602 sq km sea territory into equal two. But, a confident India did not agree. Now, the verdict gives BD 19,467 sq km, and India the remaining territory.

So, why BNP is claiming that this verdict is against BD interest, can someone answer to this question?
 
Last edited:
Let's hope now that the maritime boundaries are established that there will be observance of respect to each nation's maritime boundaries. Now, at that, I would also like to say that the Bangladeshi Coast Guard has to expeditiously guard its natural resources and take advantage of the oil and gas deposits in its territory.

I will say that India is to be respected for respecting the decision of the Tribunal. This serves an example of how a major world power respecting the legal decision of the international court. This serves as a model for other great powers to observe.
 
Bangladesh certainly did not lose any sea territory because of the Hague verdict. Bangladesh, like any other country would do, sought a compromise with India to split the disputed 25,602 sq km sea territory into equal two. But, a confident India did not agree. Now, the verdict gives BD 19,467 sq km, and India the remaining territory.

So, why BNP is claiming that this verdict is against BD interest, can someone answer to this question?


For indo-Awami subservient class who are playing ignorant, here is the education of how Awami League handed over south Talpatti even before the trial.

How Awami League handed over South Talpatti to India
 

Back
Top Bottom