What's new

Analysis and history of Myanmar China conflict

Wholegrain

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 14, 2013
Messages
1,921
Reaction score
3
Country
Taiwan, Province Of China
Location
United States
China and Burma have always been competitors since their borders touched for the first time. During the Ming and Qing dynasties China fought a series of wars along the Burmese border.

The Burmese regime under Ne Win instituted major massacres against ethnic Chinese in Myanmar in the 1960s. China responded by arming ethnic minority Communists against the Burmese government.

The Kachin State was originally disputed between China and Burma since the British took it from China when they colonized Burma but China decided to forget about it,

Since 1989, China has supported the Wa ethnic minority army against the Burmese. The Wa carved out their own enclave in Shan state, they like China, use Chinese currency and telecommunications and dislike Burmese regardless of whether it is junta or pro democracy people. They just don't like Burma.

In 2009, the Burmese junta attacked the ethnic Chinese Kokang state, the Chinese Kokang minority had their own army called the "Myanmar National Democratic Alliance Army" and the Wa and Kachin rebels also joined in the fighting.

China has begun re arming the Wa army this year against the Burmese at the beginning of this year.

China does business with Myanmar like it does it with all surrounding countries, including Japan, Vietnam, India. Myanmar's economic ties does not mean it is a friendly country. Myanmar is closer politically to India and Japan. During the junta years and military rule Myanmar allowed India to carry out cross border raids to kill separatists from northeast India. This was when Myanmar was supposedly an "ally" of China.
 
China, Myanmar & the US: A history of political expediency



s the first ever US president visiting Myanmar, Barack Obama drew worldwide attention when he made his brief visit to the country on November 19, 2012. It is clear that President Obama's latest visit, coupled with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's visit to Myanmar in November last year signals an obvious US policy change towards Myanmar, a country which is located at the crossroads of East, South and Southeast Asia and between the world's two most populated countries. The country is of strategic significance for America's "pivot to Asia" policy. There is little doubt, though, that US relations with Myanmar have always been influenced by "Chinese factors".

Due to the rise of China, Myanmar, with its significant strategic location, became an important piece in the puzzle in US plans to return to the Asia-Pacific region. The US is eager to resume relations with Myanmar, a country which it viewed as an "enemy" for more than 20 years. This eagerness was evidenced by Obama's comment on the Myitsone Incident in his presentation at Yangon University. Plans for the Myitsone dam, with an investment from China totalling US$3.6 billion, were shelved following an announcement by the president of Myanmar following strident public protests. This was the first time that Myanmar had said no to China and is therefore viewed as a momentous turning point in Sino-Burmese relations.

Prior to this, Myanmar, due to sanctions imposed by Western countries, had to rely on China. Sanctions were gradually relaxed following the accession to power of the new Burmese government in March 2011, which ushered Myanmar into the international community and gave it the opportunity to diversify its international relations. When Hillary Clinton visited Myanmar last year, Nay Zin Latt, a political advisor to Myanmar's President Thein Sein, said: "No matter how good its strategic geopolitical position is, Myanmar cannot gain continued benefits unless it operates carefully, bearing in mind that it is sandwiched by 1.3 billion Chinese people on one side and 1.1 billion Indian people on the other."


001372acd7d312337e0a13.jpg


Barack Obama kisses Aung San Suu Kyi during his visit to Myanmar


As the adage goes, "there is no permanent enemy in diplomacy." Establishing and maintaining good relationships with as many neighboring and powerful countries as possible is essential for every country. When there are changes to either the domestic or international situation, it benefits the nation to forgive and forget the "enmity" and work towards détente. The diplomatic history of US-Burmese relations is a prime example of this.

Support based on political circumstance

The US established diplomatic relations with Myanmar in 1948 when Myanmar gained its independence from Britain. The US subsequently offered financial aid totalling US$21 million to Myanmar in October 1950. Why was the US so generous to the newly independent Myanmar? The answer lies in a combination of politics and strategic significance. At that time, the People's Republic of China was also newly established and remnants of the Kuomintang regime sneaked into northern Myanmar in order to set up a base with the aim of "retaking the mainland". This made Myanmar strategically significant to the US which was covertly aiding the secret action of the Kuomintang.

From then on, the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) was active in partnership with the Kuomintang in Northern Myanmar. Perhaps as a matter of courtesy to its secret ally, the US remained silent when General Ne Win ousted the government of Myanmar in a coup. It also kept silent during a Chinese exclusion incident which impacted Sino-Burmese relations. In 1966, General Ne Win visited the US and met with the-then President Lyndon Baines Johnson in the White House. After that, Myanmar annually sent two military officers to the US for training. Myanmar's Military Intelligence (MI), which was once famous in Southeast Asia, was established thanks to training and help from the US.


001372acd7d312337f921a.jpg


General Ne Win


All of this support was related to the international situation at that time. In order to "support Chiang Kai-shek and oppose the Chinese Communist Party" and suppress the development of socialism in Asia, the US maintained good relations with Myanmar, which neighbours China, Laos and Thailand and is close to Cambodia and Vietnam. Equally, however, it worked surreptitiously to accomplish its political goals by means of Myanmar's own development.

In 1988, US-Myanmar relations underwent a significant change. Due to a multitude of reasons, including a domestic economic recession, Myanmar was hit by a nationwide student strike. Aung San Suu Kyi, who came back to Myanmar from Britain to visit her family, became a leader of the democratic movement and has remained an influential figure ever since. At the same time, a US senator visited Myanmar and met with democratic personages, including Aung San Suu Kyi. However, the country then experienced the military coup. And later, the National League for Democracy, led by Aung San Suu Kyi, won the national election in 1990, but was not recognized by the country's military forces and US-Burmese relations subsequently broke down. The US not only downgraded its level of representation in Burma from Ambassador to Chargé d'Affaires, but also ceased all aid and support to the country. Furthermore, it imposed economic sanctions, which began in 1997.

China: Still an important friend

Despite the fact that the US imposed sanctions and "severed diplomatic relations" in name of democracy and human rights, it was clear that the international political situation had experienced some significant changes. China, after the "Cultural Revolution" (1966-1976), was developing in a stable fashion, thereby dooming Kuomintang's plan to "retake the mainland". The Korean War and the Vietnam War had ended, the Soviet Union had disintegrated and the Khmer Rouge had dismantled. The US subsequently moved its attention to Europe and as a result, Myanmar became far less significant in geopolitical strategic terms.

When Myanmar was enduring its most difficult period, China became its most important partner. Thanks to China's assistance, Myanmar gradually developed its infrastructure, and slowly but progressively developed its economy and it also came out of the political wilderness. The friendship between the two countries was continuously consolidated and since this period, it is surely fair to say that China has been Myanmar's most important ally.

The international political situation is constantly changing and unpredictable. With the political and economic rise of China, the US initiated its "return to the Asia-Pacific region" strategy in a bid to reconsolidate its global hegemony. Myanmar was once more on the US political agenda. In 2009, American John Yettaw sneaked into Aung San Suu Kyi's house and was arrested. Seeing this as an opportunity, the US sent Senator Jim Webb to Myanmar, which made him first US Senator to visit the country in a decade. In the years which have followed, the US has frequently sent Senators and Assistant Secretaries of State to Myanmar. One year after Hillary Clinton's icebreaking visit, President Obama went to Myanmar two weeks after securing a second term in the White House.

History shows us that the US always stresses the importance of its relationship with Myanmar when the situation in China is unstable. But when China is in a period of stable development and Myanmar is experiencing turmoil, the US becomes estranged from Myanmar. Now that China is on the rise and democracy is developing in Myanmar, the US is once more trying to get close.

Diplomacy has no permanent enemies, only friends. As a sovereign country, Myanmar has the right to develop relations with the US. However, this does not mean that Myanmar will completely relinquish its relationship with China. It can be seen that prior to Hillary Clinton's visit to Myanmar last year, Min Aung Hlaing, commander-in-chief of the Myanmar Armed Forces, visited China. In September this year, President Thein Sein visited China for the Sino-ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) Expo before his visit to the US. And, before President Obama's visit to Myanmar, Soe Win, deputy commander-in-chief of the Myanmar Armed Forces, visited China. These events would seem to indicate that China is still Myanmar's most important ally.

Despite the fact that US-Myanmar relations are developing rapidly, Myanmar's future still largely depends on the development of the Sino-Burmese relationship.

China, Myanmar & the US: A history of political expediency - China.org.cn






More war than peace in Myanmar



LAIZA - Helicopter gunships hover in the sky above a battlefield. The constant sound of explosions and gunfire pierce the night for an estimated 100,000 refugees and internally displaced people. Military hospitals are full of wounded government soldiers, while bridges, communication lines and other crucial infrastructure lie in war-torn ruins.

The images and sounds on the ground in Myanmar's northern Kachin State shatter the impression of peace, reconciliation and a steady march towards democracy that President Thein Sein's government has bid to convey to the outside world. In reality, the situation in this remote corner of one of Asia's historically most troubled nations is depressingly normal.

Along the dirt road that snakes through the forests and over the mountains to Laiza, the headquarters of the rebel Kachin Independence Army (KIA), civilians who have fled the fighting eke out a living by growing whatever they can and from the meager provisions provided by the rebels. They have been largely ignored by the international aid community, including United Nations agencies that to date have made only symbolic gestures towards the unfolding humanitarian crisis.

The KIA are clearly outnumbered and out-gunned by the government's forces, but they are operating in an environment where the mountainous terrain and sympathetic local population work to their advantage. Casualties on the government's side, meanwhile, are believed to have been extremely heavy since hostilities broke out in June last year. In September this year, a KIA officer, quoted by a local Kachin news group, urged the government to come clean about government losses in Kachin State war zones. The truth about the loss of life, he argued, would shock the general public.

In the conflict's initial phases, the Myanmar army deployed heavily armed but poorly trained infantry forces against the KIA, resulting in a virtual slaughter on the battlefield. Some of the young government foot soldiers, many of whom have since deserted and are now in Laiza, were street children who had been rounded up in the old capital of Yangon, given some basic training and dispatched to Kachin State to fight, according to human rights workers who have interviewed deserters from the government's army.

The Myanmar army was once a poorly equipped but battle-hardened light infantry force that was constantly on the move in operations against ethnic as well as communist insurgents. Since the Communist Party of Burma (CPB) - then the country's largest and most powerful rebel army - collapsed and splintered into four different ethnic forces that entered into ceasefire agreements with the government in 1989, there has been little action in most of Myanmar's frontier areas.

With the collapse of the CPB, many other rebel armies that depended on the communists for the supply of arms and ammunition also made peace with the government. They included the KIA, which signed a ceasefire agreement with the government on February 24, 1994. All of the dozen or so other agreements made between the government and rebel groups were made verbally rather than in writing.

The Kachins insisted on having their ceasefire in writing in hope that it would be more legally binding. However, the then ruling military junta said at the time that their government was only temporary and that the KIA would have to wait for an elected government to assume power before any talks about political issues, including their demand for local autonomy, could be held.

The Kachins waited for 17 years, but after an election was held in November 2010 no such talks on political issues were forthcoming. Instead, on June 9, 2011, government forces broke the ceasefire and attacked KIA positions along the Taping river east of Bhamo.

"Several of out liaison officers, whose duty had been to oversee the ceasefire and maintain contacts with the government, were also arrested. The one in Mohnyin town was badly tortured and died in hospital shortly afterwards," said Lazing Ji No, a senior officer in the KIA's political wing, the Kachin Independence Organization (KIO).

Several rounds of peace talks between the Myanmar government and the KIO have been held since, but with no resolution in sight. "They just want to get us under their control. Our aim, and the aim of all the nationalities in the country, is to negotiate to get our rights," said KIO chairman Zawng Hra in an interview with Asia Times Online at his Laiza headquarters.

Clearly, peace means different things to the government and the ethnic rebels. The former want the latter to accept the 2008 non-federal constitution and convert their armed forces into so-called "Border Guard Forces" under the command of the Myanmar Army. Peace for the Kachins, on the other hand, means a new, or at least fundamentally amended, constitution that gives ethnic states a large degree of autonomy.

These two seemingly incompatible interpretations of peace are the reason why foreign interlocutors attempting to help broker a peace settlement have so far been unsuccessful. By avoiding discussions of political issues and only emphasizing ceasefires, disarmament and economic development, those interlocutors - including a "Peace Support Initiative" sponsored by the Norwegian government and in a separate initiative the Switzerland-based Center for Humanitarian Dialog - are essentially promoting the government's view, according to several people Asia Times Online spoke with in Laiza and elsewhere.

Other ethnic groups and prominent political players share the KIO's view. In an interview in Yangon in September, Hkun Htun Oo, chairperson of the Shan Nationalities League for Democracy, a legal political party, said that, "We totally reject the 2008 constitution." Pro-democracy icon and opposition parliamentarian Aung San Suu Kyi told Asia Times Online in a recent interview in the new capital Naypyidaw that "democracy cannot be substituted by economic development".

Intensified conflict
With such divergent, locked-in positions, it is hardly surprising that the war in Kachin State is intensifying. According to several diplomatic sources, the government is set to launch a major offensive to try to capture Laiza and other KIO/KIA strongholds.

Perhaps fearing more heavy casualties in face-to-face combat, government forces have recently resorted to the extensive use of artillery, including 105mm howitzers, 120mm mortars and Russian-made Mi-35 helicopters, the export version of the Mi-24 Hind helicopter gunship that was used extensively in the Afghan war in the 1980s. Such helicopter gunships have also been used to attack KIA forces in the area west of Laiza and near the Pangva area northeast of the state capital, Myitkyina.

In the Hpakan area in western Kachin State, the government has used 84mm Carl Gustaf rocket launchers manufactured in Sweden to attack rebel positions. The revelation, first reported by this correspondent earlier this month, has prompted a Swedish government investigation into how the weapons ended up in Myanmar despite a European Union embargo on arms sales to the country.

According to a statement made by trade minister Ewa Bjorling in the Swedish parliament on December 13, the weapons in question were supplied to the Myanmar army by India despite an agreement between Stockholm and New Delhi that the guns could not be transferred to a third country. The Myanmar government has tried to dodge the issue by claiming in a report published in the Myanmar-language weekly The Voice on December 17 that the guns were imported to Myanmar from Sweden "before the EU arms embargo came into force".

While Myanmar did buy a quantity of Carl Gustaf rocket launchers from Sweden in 1982, they were a much older model. The one that was captured by the KIA in October this year was the most recent model of the gun, and according to the serial number was part of a larger shipment of arms sold to the Indian government in 2003, according to a spokeswoman for Sweden's Agency for Non-Proliferation and Export Controls (ISP).

According to informed local sources in Myanmar, the Swedish weapons were given to the Myanmar army to be used against insurgents from the northeastern Indian states of Assam and Manipur who maintain bases across the border in northwestern Myanmar. But instead of attacking those rebel camps used to launch cross-border raids into India against Indian government positions, the Myanmar army deployed the weapons against the KIA.

The controversy has internationalized the Kachin war in an unprecedented way and comes significantly at a time when many Western countries have largely turned a blind eye to the conflict in pursuit of engagement policies and commercial opportunities with Thein Sein's quasi-civilian government. According to knowledgeable sources, the arms embargo issue will soon be raised in the European Parliament, a move that could lead to a more critical diplomatic approach to recent developments in Myanmar.

Even so, it is doubtful that the Myanmar government will halt its offensive against the KIA or engage any time soon in meaningful peace talks. One major problem is that the government's chief negotiator, minister in the prime minister's office Aung Min - the darling of the Norwegian government and other foreign interlocutors - has no mandate to negotiate political issues with the KIO.

"Aung Min has no political mandate," said KIO chairman Zawng Hra. "So far, he has always avoided talking about political issues. His duty is only to present and follow his government's policies."

Moreover, it is not clear that even Thein Sein has the power to negotiate with the Kachin. His calls upon the army to stop fighting have fallen on deaf ears on at least two occasions since hostilities broke out last year. That has raised questions about whether Thein Sein has control of the military, which appear to answer only to Commander-in-Chief Gen Min Aung Hlaing. The ongoing war in Kachin State is thus a grim reminder that when it comes to crucial issues of national security, Myanmar remains firmly under military rule.

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/NL18Ae01.html
 
Special Report - In Myanmar, apartheid tactics against minority Muslims



(Reuters) - A 16-year-old Muslim boy lay dying on a thin metal table. Bitten by a rabid dog a month ago, he convulsed and drooled as his parents wedged a stick between his teeth to stop him from biting off his tongue.

Swift treatment might have saved Waadulae. But there are no doctors, painkillers or vaccines in this primitive hospital near Sittwe, capital of Rakhine State in western Myanmar. It is a lonely medical outpost that serves about 85,300 displaced people, almost all of them Muslims who lost their homes in fighting with Buddhist mobs last year.

"All we can give him is sedatives," said Maung Maung Hla, a former health ministry official who, despite lacking a medical degree, treats about 150 patients a day. The two doctors who once worked there haven't been seen in a month. Medical supplies stopped when they left, said Maung Maung Hla, a Muslim.

These trash-strewn camps represent the dark side of Myanmar's celebrated transition to democracy: apartheid-like policies segregating minority Muslims from the Buddhist majority. As communal violence spreads, nowhere are these practices more brutally enforced than around Sittwe.

In an echo of what happened in the Balkans after the fall of communist Yugoslavia, the loosening of authoritarian control in Myanmar is giving freer rein to ethnic hatred.

President Thein Sein, a former general, said in a May 6 televised speech his government was committed to creating "a peaceful and harmonious society in Rakhine State."

But the sand dunes and barren paddy fields outside Sittwe hold a different story. Here, emergency shelters set up for Rohingya Muslims last year have become permanent, prison-like ghettos. Muslims are stopped from leaving at gunpoint. Aid workers are threatened. Camps seethe with anger and disease.

In central Sittwe, ethnic Rakhine Buddhists and local officials exult in what they regard as a hard-won triumph: streets almost devoid of Muslims. Before last year's violence, the city's Muslims numbered about 73,000, nearly half its population. Today, there are fewer than 5,000 left.

Myanmar's transformation from global pariah to budding democracy once seemed remarkably smooth. After nearly half a century of military dictatorship, the quasi-civilian government that took power in March 2011 astonished the world by releasing dissidents, relaxing censorship and re-engaging with the West.

Then came the worst sectarian violence for decades. Clashes between Rakhine Buddhists and stateless Rohingya Muslims in June and October 2012 killed at least 192 people and displaced 140,000. Most of the dead and homeless were Muslims.

"Rakhine State is going through a profound crisis" that "has the potential to undermine the entire reform process," said Tomás Ojea Quintana, U.N. special rapporteur on human rights in Myanmar.

Life here, he said, resembles junta-era Myanmar, with rampant human-rights abuses and a pervasive security apparatus. "What is happening in Rakhine State is following the pattern of what has happened in Myanmar during the military government," he said in an interview.

The crisis poses the biggest domestic challenge yet for the reformist leaders of one of Asia's most ethnically diverse countries. Muslims make up about 5 percent of its 60 million people. Minorities, such as the Kachin and the Shan, are watching closely after enduring persecution under the former junta.

As the first powerful storm of the monsoon season approached western Myanmar this week, the government and U.N. agencies began a chaotic evacuation from the camps, urging thousands of Rohingya Muslims to move to safer areas on higher ground across Rakhine State.

Some resisted, fearing they would lose all they had left: their tarpaulin tents and makeshift huts. More than 50 are believed to have drowned in a botched evacuation by sea.

"THEY ALL TELL LIES"

Sittwe's last remaining Muslim-dominated quarter, Aung Mingalar, is locked down by police and soldiers who patrol all streets leading in and out. Muslims can't leave without written permission from Buddhist local authorities, which Muslims say is almost impossible to secure.

Metal barricades, topped with razor wire, are opened only for Buddhist Rakhines. Despite a ban against foreign journalists, Reuters was able to enter Aung Mingalar. Near-deserted streets were flanked by shuttered shops. Some Muslims peered from doors or windows.

On the other side of the barricades, Rakhine Buddhists revel in the segregation.

"I don't trust them. They are not honest," said Khin Mya, 63, who owns a general store on Sittwe's main street. "Muslims are hot-headed; they like to fight, either with us or among themselves."

Ei Mon Kyaw, 19, who sells betel nut and chewing tobacco, said Muslims are "really dirty. It is better we live apart."

State spokesman Win Myaing, a Buddhist, explained why Aung Mingalar's besieged Muslims were forbidden from speaking to the media. "It's because they all tell lies," he said. He also denied the government had engaged in ethnic cleansing, a charge leveled most recently by Human Rights Watch in an April 22 report.

"How can it be ethnic cleansing? They are not an ethnic group," he said from an office on Sittwe's main street, overlooking an empty mosque guarded by soldiers and police.

His comments reflect a historic dispute over the origins of the country's estimated 800,000 Rohingya Muslims, who claim a centuries-old lineage in Rakhine State.

The government says they are Muslim migrants from northern neighbor Bangladesh who arrived during British rule from 1824. After independence in 1948, Myanmar's new rulers tried to limit citizenship to those whose roots in the country predated British rule. A 1982 Citizenship Act excluded Rohingya from the country's 135 recognized ethnic groups, denying them citizenship and rendering them stateless. Bangladesh also disowns them and has refused to grant them refugee status since 1992.

The United Nations calls them "virtually friendless" and among the world's most persecuted people.

BOAT PEOPLE EXODUS

The state government has shelved any plan to return the Rohingya Muslims to their villages on a technicality: for defying a state requirement that they identify themselves as "Bengali," a term that suggests they are illegal immigrants from Bangladesh.

All these factors are accelerating an exodus of Rohingya boat people emigrating in rickety fishing vessels to other Southeast Asian countries.

From October to March, between the monsoons, about 25,000 Rohingya left Myanmar on boats, according to new data from Arakan Project, a Rohingya advocacy group. That was double the previous year, turning a Rakhine problem into a region-wide one.

The cost of the one-way ticket is steep for an impoverished people - usually about 200,000 kyat, or $220, often paid for by remittances from family members who have already left.

Many who survive the perilous journeys wind up in majority-Muslim Malaysia. Some end up in U.N. camps, where they are denied permanent asylum. Others find illegal work on construction sites or other subsistence jobs. Tens of thousands are held in camps in Thailand. Growing numbers have been detained in Indonesia.

MOB VIOLENCE

Rakhine State, one of the poorest regions of Southeast Asia's poorest country, had high hopes for the reform era.

In Sittwe's harbor, India is funding a $214 million port, river and road network that will carve a trade route into India's landlocked northeast. From Kyaukphyu, a city 65 miles southeast of Sittwe, gas and oil pipelines stretch to China's energy-hungry northwest. Both projects capitalize on Myanmar's growing importance at Asia's crossroads.

That promise has been interrupted by communal tensions that flared into the open after the rape and murder of a Buddhist woman by Muslim men in May last year. Six days later, in retribution, a Buddhist mob beat 10 Muslims to death. Violence then swept Maungdaw, one of the three Rohingya-majority districts bordering Bangladesh, on June 8. Rohingya mobs destroyed homes and killed an unknown number of Rakhines.

The clashes spread to Sittwe. More than 2,500 homes and buildings went up in flames, as Rohingya and Rakhine mobs rampaged. When the smoke cleared, both suffered losses, though the official death toll for Rohingya - 57 - was nearly double that for Buddhist Rakhines. Entire Muslim districts were razed.

October saw more violence. This time, Buddhist mobs attacked Muslim villages across the state over five days, led in some cases by Rakhine nationalists tied to a powerful political party, incited by Buddhist monks and abetted at times by local security forces..

U.S. President Barack Obama, on a groundbreaking visit in November, urged reconciliation. "The Rohingya ... hold within themselves the same dignity as you do, and I do," he said. The week he visited, Thein Sein vowed to forge ethnic unity in a letter to the United Nations.

But the violence kept spreading. Anti-Muslim unrest, whipped up by Buddhist monks, killed at least 44 people in the central city of Meikhtila in March. In April and May, Buddhist mobs destroyed mosques and hundreds of Muslim homes just a few hours' drive from Yangon, the country's largest city.

Thein Sein responded by sending troops to volatile areas and setting up an independent commission into the Rakhine violence. Its recommendations, released April 27, urged meetings of Muslim and Buddhist leaders to foster tolerance, Muslims to be moved to safer ground ahead of the storm season, and the continued segregation of the two communities "until the overt emotions subside."

It sent a strong message, calling the Rohingya "Bengalis," a term that suggests they belong in Bangladesh, and backing the 1982 citizenship law that rendered stateless even those Rohingya who had lived in Myanmar for generations.

The Rohingya's rapid population growth had fueled the clashes with Buddhists, it said, recommending voluntary family-planning education programs for them. It suggested doubling the number of soldiers and police in the region.

Rohingya responded angrily. "We completely reject this report," said Fukan Ahmed, 54, a Rohingya elder who lost his home in Sittwe.

Local government officials, however, were already moving to impose policies in line with the report.

THE HATED LIST

On the morning of April 26, a group of state officials entered the Theak Kae Pyin refugee camp. With them were three policemen and several Border Administration Force officers, known as the Nasaka, a word derived from the initials of its Burmese name. Unique to the region, the Nasaka consists of officers from the police, military, customs and immigration. They control every aspect of Rohingya life, and are much feared.

Documented human-rights abuses blamed on the Nasaka include rape, forced labor and extortion. Rohingya cannot travel or marry without the Nasaka's permission, which is never secured without paying bribes, activists allege.

State spokesman Win Myaing said the Nasaka's mission was to compile a list identifying where people had lived before the violence, a precondition for resettlement. They wanted to know who was from Sittwe and who was from more remote townships such as Pauktaw and Kyaukphyu, areas that saw a near-total expulsion of Muslims in October.

Many fled for what Win Myaing said were unregistered camps outside Sittwe, often in flood-prone areas. "We would like to move them back to where they came from in the next two months," said Win Myaing. The list was the first step towards doing that.

The list, however, also required Muslims to identify themselves as Bengali. For Fukan Ahmed and other Rohingya leaders, it sent a chilling message: If they want to be resettled, they must deny their identity.

Agitated crowds gathered as the officials tried to compile the list, witnesses said. Women and children chanted "Rohingya! Rohingya!" As the police officers were leaving, one tumbled to the ground, struck by a stone to his head, according to Win Myaing. Rohingya witnesses said the officer tripped. Seven Rohingya were arrested and charged with causing grievous hurt to a public servant, criminal intimidation and rioting.

Compiling the list is on hold, said Win Myaing. So, too, is resettlement.

"If they trust us, then (resettlement) can happen immediately. If you won't even accept us making a list, then how can we try and do other things?" he asked. The crisis could be defused if Rohingya accepted the 1982 Citizenship Law, he said.

But doing so would effectively confirm their statelessness. Official discrimination and lack of documentation meant many Rohingya have no hope of fulfilling the requirements.

Boshi Raman, 40, said he and other Rohingya would never sign a document calling themselves Bengali. "We would rather die," he said.

Win Myaing blamed the Rohingya for their misfortune. "If you look back at the events that occurred, it wasn't because the Rakhines were extreme. The problems were all started by them," the Muslims, he said.

SCORCHED EARTH

In Theak Kae Pyin camp, a sea of tarpaulin tents and fragile huts built of straw from the last rice harvest, there is an air of growing permanence. More than 11,000 live in this camp alone, according to U.N. data. Naked children bathe in a murky-brown pond and play on sewage-lined pathways.

A year ago, before the unrest, Haleda Somisian lived in Narzi, a Sittwe district of more than 10,000 people. Today, it is rubble and scorched earth. Somisian, 20, wants to return and rebuild. Her husband, she says, has started to beat her. In Narzi, he worked. Now he is jobless, restless and despondent.

"I want to leave this place," she said.

Some of those confined to the camps are Kaman Muslims, who are recognized as one of Myanmar's 135 official ethnic groups; they usually hold citizenship and can be hard to tell apart from Rakhine Buddhists. They fled after October's violence when their homes were destroyed by Rakhine mobs in remote townships such as Kyaukphyu. They, too, are prevented from leaving.

Beyond Sittwe, another 50,000 people, mostly Rohingya, live in similar camps in other parts of the state destroyed in last year's sectarian violence.

Across the state, the U.N relief agency has provided about 4,000 tents and built about 300 bamboo homes, each of which can hold eight families. Another 500 bamboo homes are planned by year-end. None are designed to be permanent, said agency spokeswoman Vivian Tan. Tents can last six months to a year; bamboo homes about two years.

The agency wants to provide the temporary shelter that is badly needed. "But we don't want in any way to create permanent shelters and to condone any kind of segregation," Tan said.

Aid group Doctors Without Borders has accused hardline nationalists of threatening its staff, impairing its ability to deliver care. Mobile clinics have appeared in some camps, but a U.N. report describes most as "insufficient."

Waadulae, suffering from rabies, was treated at Dar Paing hospital, whose lone worker, Maung Maung Hla, was overwhelmed. "We have run out of antibiotics," he said. "There is no malaria medicine. There's no medicine for tuberculosis or diabetes. No vaccines. There's no equipment to check peoples' condition. There are no drips for people suffering from acute diarrhea."

State spokesman Win Myaing said Rakhine doctors feared entering the camps. "It's reached a stage where they say they'd quit their jobs before they would go to these places," he said.

The treatment of the Rohingya contrasts with that of some 4,080 displaced ethnic Rakhine Buddhists in central Sittwe. They can leave their camps freely, work in the city, move in with relatives in nearby villages and rebuild, helped by an outpouring of aid from Burmese business leaders.

Hset Hlaing, 33, who survives on handouts from aid agencies at Thae Chaung camp, recalls how he earned 10,000 kyat ($11 a day) from a general-goods stall in Sittwe before his business and home went up in flames last June. Like other Muslims, he refuses to accept the term Bengali.

"I don't want to go to another country. I was born here," he says, sipping tea in a bamboo shack. "But if the government won't accept us, we will leave. We'll go by boat. We'll go to a country that can accept us."

Special Report - In Myanmar, apartheid tactics against minority Muslims | Reuters
 
Myanmar is also majority devout Theravada Buddhist which China is not. The only Buddhism in China is Mahayana Buddhism and most Chinese are fake Buddhists. The power of the monasteries and monks was destroyed by anti Buddhist Chinese nationalists during the Tang dynasty and never recovered.
 
^^^

I don't know what you mean by fake Buddhists. Are there genuine Buddhists? Please direct me to find just one.

The real Buddhists originate in China, they are called Ch'an (Zen) followers.

The Buddhists in India are fake.
The Buddhists in Tibet are fake.
The Thailand's are fake.

Genuine Buddhism does not talk about reincarnation, karma, those bullshit.
 
All these Muslims people should return to India or Bangladesh.

But I'm purposing they should go to Dubai. Dubai is a great place and I hope the best for them.

Muslims people in Dubai will welcome them, as they are brothers, isn't?

Let's started the campaign! :cheers:


Muslims people are well-known that they dislike to grab other people territory or land. And they will prove it by withdrawing their people to Dubai, a great free civilized city of Muslims.
 
^^^

I don't know what you mean by fake Buddhists. Are there genuine Buddhists? Please direct me to find just one.

The real Buddhists originate in China, they are called Ch'an (Zen) followers.

The Buddhists in India are fake.
The Buddhists in Tibet are fake.
The Thailand's are fake.

Genuine Buddhism does not talk about reincarnation, karma, those bullshit.


images
 
^^^

I don't know what you mean by fake Buddhists. Are there genuine Buddhists? Please direct me to find just one.

The real Buddhists originate in China, they are called Ch'an (Zen) followers.

The Buddhists in India are fake.
The Buddhists in Tibet are fake.
The Thailand's are fake.

Genuine Buddhism does not talk about reincarnation, karma, those bullshit.

and u are a genuine fool...
 
All these Muslims people should return to India or Bangladesh.

But I'm purposing they should go to Dubai. Dubai is a great place and I hope the best for them.

Muslims people in Dubai will welcome them, as they are brothers, isn't?

Let's started the campaign! :cheers:


Muslims people are well-known that they dislike to grab other people territory or land. And they will prove it by withdrawing their people to Dubai, a great free civilized city of Muslims.

why those Muslim people go to Bangladesh or India ? or even Dubai ? ( you are saying return which means they were in bangladesh before)
 
^^^

I don't know what you mean by fake Buddhists. Are there genuine Buddhists? Please direct me to find just one.

The real Buddhists originate in China, they are called Ch'an (Zen) followers.

The Buddhists in India are fake.
The Buddhists in Tibet are fake.
The Thailand's are fake.

Genuine Buddhism does not talk about reincarnation, karma, those bullshit.
then what does general buddhism talks about ??
Jihad ?
72 virgins ?
bombing of buddha statues ?
china being a communist regime ,have no space for religions ..
bashing of muslims in xinxiang & buddhists in tibet is still a serious concern .
 
^^^

I don't know what you mean by fake Buddhists. Are there genuine Buddhists? Please direct me to find just one.

The real Buddhists originate in China, they are called Ch'an (Zen) followers.

The Buddhists in India are fake.
The Buddhists in Tibet are fake.
The Thailand's are fake.

Genuine Buddhism does not talk about reincarnation, karma, those bullshit.

Yes yes it was the Chinese who taught Buddha how to meditate n did i forgot to mention that Buddha himself was a Han Chinese from Hongkong :omghaha:

n only Original CCP certified Chinese r true Buddhist...:china:
 
Neo-Nazi denial in Myanmar



Myanmar has a newly registered Nazi party, the Rakhine National Development Party (RNDP), created ceremoniously in the wake of last year's anti-Muslim ethnic cleansing in western Rakhine State. Naypyidaw has incubated the party, while opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi has wined and dined publicly with controversial


RNDP leaders, including party chairman and member of parliament Dr Aye Maung.

Separate branches of the Myanmar state, including the executive office of President Thein Sein, the parliament, and the judiciary, have all tolerated or tacitly backed the neo-Nazi Buddhist movement known as "969". The Buddhist fundamentalist movement, led by fascist monks such as U Wirathu and RNDP leaders like Aung Maung, himself a Bangladesh-born Rakhine, has been pivotal and yet unpunished in recent violence against Muslims that have killed hundreds and displaced upwards of 120,000.

Underscoring the racist bias, the judiciary recently sentenced a Muslim customer who peeled a 969 sticker off the mirror of a street vendor with his motorcycle key to two years imprisonment for "insulting religion". At the same time, the Thein Sein administration in Naypyidaw has failed to bring anyone to justice for participating in the broad daylight slaughter of 10 Muslim pilgrims in a public space in the southern Rakhine town of Taung-gok in early June 2012. Nor has anyone been prosecuted for this and last year's widely videotaped pogroms against Muslim communities.

With this type of blatant impunity, it is little wonder that the RNDP openly subscribes to neo-Nazism in its quest to create a pure "Buddhist state". The RNDP's official journal, "Toe-Tet-Yay" (or Progress), regularly uses the Burmese word for "beasts" when referring to Myanmar's Muslims, including the ethnic Rohingya. In media interviews as well as parliamentary discussions, RNDP leaders have with discernible admiration publicly talked about how Rakhine patriots should look to Israel and its apartheid system vis-a-vis the Palestinians as a model for handling the Rohingya.

An editorial in Progress's November 2012 edition even endorsed the view that while former fascist leader Hitler may have been a monster to Jews, he was a nationalist hero to many Germans. This is a view that any German in his or her right mind would find extremely repulsive and impossible to sympathize with.

Myanmar's homegrown neo-Nazi party of the Rakhines also calls for national level authorities in Naypyidaw to hold firm against any international pressure, including US rights lobby Human Right Watch's recent characterization of state-linked violence against the Rohingya as "ethnic cleansing", in dealing with the Rohingya situation, including the recent massive displacement of the group along the Bangladesh border.

Instead, they advocate for the forceful implementation of the blatantly racist 1982 Citizenship Act, which was specifically designed to bar any citizenship rights or recognition for Rohingya who lacked the documentation to prove that their ancestry was based in Myanmar, then known as Burma, before the first British defeat of the Burmese feudal kingdom in 1824.

(Incidentally, printing machines arrived in the palm-leaf society of feudal, pre-colonial Burma only around the mid-19th century - and even then it was thanks to the Christian missionaries. By this standard, 99% of supposedly "pure-blooded" Burmese would be rendered ineligible for citizenship.)

The RNDP's racist views have top level support. Speaking recently in New York, Myanmar Immigration Minister and ex-police chief Khin Yi reaffirmed the government's commitment to applying the Citizenship Act of 1982 to the Rohingya who survived last year's pogroms. Khin Yi, who has no exposure to the liberal West or little in terms of critical education, may be forgiven for his bluntness.

However, Myanmar's intellectual elites, including Western-educated opinion makers with PhDs and other advanced credentials from Ivy League schools and Oxbridge, have echoed Khin Yi's official racist stance on recognizing Rohingya citizenship. During his trip this week to Washington, Thein Sein confirmed the government's commitment to enforcing the racist Citizenship Act.

Asia Times Online :: Southeast Asia news and business from Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand, Malaysia and Vietnam
 
Burmese Muslims given two-child limit

Burmese Muslims given two-child limit | World news | guardian.co.uk



The Chinese Muslim, Panthays 潘泰人, are spread over many parts of Burma with their mosques in Yangon, Mandalay, Taungyi, Lashio, Tangyang, Kyaington, Pyin-Oo-Lwin, Myitkyina and Mogok. Many Panthays assimilated into the Burmese society by marrying local women and are well offed. So far they're not discriminated against (yet) but I wonder how this two-child policy will affect them.
 

Back
Top Bottom