What's new

‘Quality, capacity, safety of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons better than India’s’

The Roman military had to sail to Scotland in limited numbers from Italy. This could take weeks if not longer. They did not have a supply route or a population 7x bigger than Scotland backing them up that bordered Scotland. The only advantage they had was weapons technology. Every other advantage was with the Scots and Picts. So the comparison of that with Pakistan and India is completely ludicrous.

The Roman Army was located right on the border to Scotland after the conquest of Britain.
Soldiers in the Roman Army were not supplied from Italy.
The distance between Italy and Scotland is not that different from the distance
between Eastern India and Pakistan.
They mostly bought produce from local merchants, so distance from Italy was largely irrelevant.

Please continue to stick Your head in the sand and modify conditions amounting way beyond ludicrous.
 
Last edited:
So now it is the full population... You wringle around like a snake.

The Population of the Roman Empire was 50-70M.
The Pict/Scot population was far. Way below 7M which is what is needed for 7x.
The Romans had advanced armour, advanced steel swords, and field artillery.
All which was lacking on the Pict side.
Contrary to the Picts, Pakistan is not alone, since it is getting a lot of funding from the US,
even if that is for other purposes.

The Scots again defended themselves successfully against the English,
which had much, much higher population and heavy cavalry (knights).
So no, Pakistan is not unique except in Your mind.

The Russians have the Orthodox Church, Northern Europe is Lutheran,
and Central/Southern Europe is Catholic. There is no love lost between the fractions.
The Pak-India conflict is NOTHING, compared to the Thirty Year War between Catholics and Protestants.
Fought between 1618-1648 it had 8M casualties.
It is estimated that 80% of all villages in the current Czech Republic was deserted at the end of the war.
Heretics were burned on stakes.
Except for the genocide during the late 1940s, the real Pak-India wars generate 1000s of casualties, not Millions.
It is children playing compared to the religious wars of Europe.

So no, we are not talking small skirmishes. It was total war draining the population.
During the Great Nordic War, more than 10% of the Swedish population was in the Army.
Pakistan/India has only a small fraction of their population in the India.

India does not seek a military conquest of Pakistan, but would be quite happy to see the country disintegrate.

Ask the chap to explain the concept of "Ghazwa e Hind" .. He is on my ignore list so I do not/will not interact with him in anyway ..

Also did I not warn you in my previous thread to brace yourself, you are about to be called out as a "filthy" Indian ..

I reiterate --

images


Let it go mate .. not worth it
 
The Roman Army was located right on the border to Scotland after the conquest of Britain.
Soldiers in the Roman Army were not supplied from Italy.
The distance between Italy and Scotland is not that different from the distance
between Eastern India and Pakistan.
They mostly bought produce from local merchants, so distance from Italy was largely irrelevant.

Please continue to stick Your head in the stand and modify conditions amounting way beyond ludicrous.


Lol.........lol.......yes because Western Italy shares a border with Scotland now does it or perhaps in the past it did......lol.....:rofl::rofl:

And Italy is so big that Eastern Italy is the same distance from Scotland as Pakistan is from india.......lol......:rofl:

The only person who has his head in the sand is an indian pretending to be a Swede hiding behind a Swedish flag.....:rofl:........lol
 
At least you admitted that the indian nation had evil intentions towards Pakistan.


PS Nice try. Nice try coming on PDF as a Swede when in fact you are an indian hiding behind the flag of another nation.......lol. Absolutely pathetic. You've given yourself away too easily......lol. A genuine REAL SWEDE knows nothing about Pakistan or india nor cares about it's history or politics.........lol......:rofl:

A lot of indians are doing the above especially since we put a stop to indian nonsense recently.....lol.

Yeah, right...
And Palestinians are convinced that I am an Israeli Jew...
Meanwhile, I am arguing with @Solomon2 ...
and arguing with Indians about LCA.

As I said, I think it is fun to expose Charlatans like Yourself.
I don't care which nation You belong to.
 
BS claim, the Picts repelled the Roman Empire for 100s of years.
The claim is BS in any case considering that Pakistan was actually not able to withstand India successfully.

India defeated Pakistan Army(forming the largest surrender in history since WWII) and broke Pakistan into less than half of its original size . What was left is a 'part' of the original Pakistan.
 
The Roman Army was located right on the border to Scotland after the conquest of Britain.
Soldiers in the Roman Army were not supplied from Italy.
The distance between Italy and Scotland is not that different from the distance
between Eastern India and Pakistan.
They mostly bought produce from local merchants, so distance from Italy was largely irrelevant.

Please continue to stick Your head in the stand and modify conditions amounting way beyond ludicrous.


@Oscar @waz We have an indian here who is confused. Claims to be Swedish and is hiding behind a Swedish flag......lol......:rofl:
:rofl::rofl:
 
Lol.........lol.......yes because Western Italy shares a border with Scotland now does it or perhaps in the past it did......lol.....:rofl::rofl:

And Italy is so big that Eastern Italy is the same distance from Scotland as Pakistan is from india.......lol......:rofl:

The only person who has his head in the sand is an indian pretending to be a Swede hiding behind a Swedish flag.....:rofl:........lol

The location of Italy is irrelevant, what is important is the location of the Roman province of Britannia.

image.gif
 
The claim is BS in any case considering that Pakistan was actually not able to withstand India successfully.

India defeated Pakistan Army(forming the largest surrender in history since WWII) and broke Pakistan into less than half of its original size . What was left is a 'part' of the original Pakistan.


The biggest humiliation came when a minority came and ruled india for centuries and then ripped out a significant part of it to form Pakistan and then bangladesh. You guys are still crying about it. So by your logic india no longer exists. What exists is what was broken and taken away from india on August the 14th 1947.

Wow what an achievement! 40,000 Pakistani troops, 50,000 members of their families, 2500 kms from their homeland, surrounded by 100 million bengalis and over 500 million indians. So capturing them is an achievement then.......lol.

So for all the big talk, what happened to isolating Pakistan and India being powerless to do anything to Pakistan after mumbai 2008? :azn: That too when you are more than 7x bigger than us and have abundant access to the world's most advanced weapons systems whilst we are denied that privilege? :azn:

The location of Italy is irrelevant, what is important is the location of the Roman province of Britannia.

View attachment 364141


So now all the Romans were living in England then.......lol......lol.....:rofl::rofl:

Or perhaps in your case indians are in fact Swedes...... lol... :rofl:

Keep going you're hilarious and entertaining..... :rofl:

The indian who's confused and thinks he is Swedish......:rofl:
 
Lol.........lol.......yes because Western Italy shares a border with Scotland now does it or perhaps in the past it did......lol.....:rofl::rofl:

And Italy is so big that Eastern Italy is the same distance from Scotland as Pakistan is from india.......lol......:rofl:

The only person who has his head in the sand is an indian pretending to be a Swede hiding behind a Swedish flag.....:rofl:........lol

It is much SHORTER from Western Italy to Scotland (1800 km) than it is from Eastern India to Pakistan (2500 km).
 
It is much SHORTER from Western Italy to Scotland (1800 km) than it is from Eastern India to Pakistan (2500 km).


Lol.....that is irrelevant when india borders Pakistan. In fact all that does is show the size of the enemy Pakistan is facing. So now Italy borders Scotland then does it? Italian landmass stretches all the way from Italy to Scotland......lol......lol.....:rofl::rofl:

indian logic at it's best......lol. A high indian who is severely confused and thinks he is Swedish......lol:rofl:
 
The biggest humiliation came when a minority came and ruled india for centuries and then ripped out a significant part of it to form Pakistan and then bangladesh. You guys are still crying about it. So by your logic india no longer exists. What exists is what was broken and taken away from india on August the 14th 1947.

Pakistan/BD is the remaining result of that conquest.
Are You proud of that?
Your ancestors were probably part of the majority humiliated at the time.

You also claim that Pakistan is part of India...
Don't know if other Pakistanis appreciate that.
 
@A.P. Richelieu

a. Abused via personal attacks and what not
b. Be called an Indian bootlicker.
c. Be called an Indian, faking a Swedish identity

Nice try coming on PDF as a Swede when in fact you are an indian hiding behind the flag of another nation

indian pretending to be a Swede hiding behind a Swedish flag.....:rofl:........lol

We have an indian here who is confused. Claims to be Swedish and is hiding behind a Swedish flag......lol......:rofl:

perhaps in your case indians are in fact Swedes...... lol...

Told ya. :cheesy:. :welcome:
 
Pakistan/BD is the remaining result of that conquest.
Are You proud of that?
Your ancestors were probably part of the majority humiliated at the time.

You also claim that Pakistan is part of India...
Don't know if other Pakistanis appreciate that.


We are NOT part of the indian nation or race but Pakistan was carved out of land that many indians CLAIM was there's.

This notion that modern day Pakistanis are Hindus that converted to Islam doesn't hold up. Modern day Pakistanis bear very little if any resemblance to the VAST majority of modern day indians. So this theory goes down the gutter.

PS Was Sweden ever part of india?......lol.
 
It really does not matter how good weapons they have.After escalation few Indian cities will be destroyed no doubt. But, before we go down, our all three strike capabilities along with H bombs will ensure Pakistanis will not live to see the next dawn ether. Nuclear weapons are for the likes of Musharraf to just boast. No sane General will ever want to touch them.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom