you dont get it do you,the britished ruled india with an iron fist the didnt want india to develop where as in case of hk they got the time to change their way ie after the ww2 indian couldnt even be hired on a higher post when britishers ruled india surely that was not the case in hk in 1980s,90s
consider a person a freedom fighter when to release him form an indian prison people have to play with 150 innocent lives such a shame that he was give free entry in pakistan
its was because the times were different before ww2 the britishers looked down on people in their colonies they equated dogs and indians and they robbed india and other countries of many things
that was not the case with hong kong as they became more considerated after ww2 and china leased...
you said that the poor in honkong live like the richest 5% in india so the poor ambani and tata must be given homes there the may be poorest of poor compared to a chinese but can afford a slum