You are quoting a blog ?? That's what you got ??? There are numerous incidents in Kashmir and North-east when militants committed crimes against local people wearing army uniform to incite the locals against the army and India. I challenged you to put the proof and this is what you got ?? I must...
By putting forth incomprehensible arguments ,like quoted above, what do you want to say ??? So now do we need to take your permission for stating the fact that Kashmir is a part of India ???.
You are illogical in your statements and put forth arguments like these "on the other hand it was India...
What has UAE to do with SCO ??? Also I believe you forget that Dubai is under massive debt. They even had to refinance it after things didn't improve the way they expected. And you are showing yourself as an idiot by comparing India with Ghana. On the otherhand it also shows that in your view...
Haha...I can only laugh at this ludicrous sentence. On a serious note tell me one country where Pak has invested more. Also India has already invested/committed more than $2 billion till 2015 in Astan.
Now you just read the first sentence about SCO in wikipedia but you forgot to atleast see the contents. Read the economic and cultural cooperation also on the same page rather than just reading the first sentence :P :P
Shows your naivety. India won't donate billions to CAR. They will invest there. There is a difference between bussiness and charity. Learn that first.
Secondly by writing the bold sentence you just show how anisine you are or how much hatred there is in you against India. You are so obstinate...
You are so short-sighted that you believe the SCO is just about China, Russia. Instead the main focus of SCO is CAR. And CAR doesn't have representatives in BRIC. You don't even know what are the objectives of SCO and that is why you see Pak as more important than India to SCO.
SCO is about cooperation not just "Geostartegic relevance". India has already invested $1.5 billions with plans to invest $0.5 billions more in Astan. People of Astan like India because of it's humanitarian works. India is treating hundreds of patients in Astan daily. And what has Pak done...
You guys are so naive. You always try to give much importance to Pak when Pak doesn't even matter. SCO is mainly about Astan and Pak is BS to say the least. Pak isn't even it's full member till now. SCO is about enchanced cooperation between China, Russia and Central Asian countries. Indeed it...
Russia is a responsible country.
On the other hand India also needs such technology especially now that we have nuclear submarines for a nuclear triad.
By your logic the CPM is also a good party as no communal fights broke down in it's long tenure in WB ?? But the reality is that the situation of muslims in Gujrat is better off than those in WB. The fact is Narendra Modi is a much better CM than anyone else as far as development is considered...
The mainstream Media is not reporting any such BS. If the decision had been political then US had to there. But Defense Ministry made sure that IAF gets the best and debrief has been given to all other contenders who were ousted. Moreover Italy does not matter much in India's Strategic circles...
First of all, can you tell why have you compared Muslim countries with India. Probably you don't know that India has world's second largest muslim population.
Secondly as far as the percapita income is concerned, most of these countries have petro-dollars which is mainly confined in the hands...
The points you have written are all stupid. Afghanis hate Pakistan as Pak is the reason that there is so much bloodshed in Astan.
And Soviet union should be grateful to USA ??? LoL. Get your history right kid. It was the Soviet attack that marked the starting of the end of German power...
Have you ever been to college ?? If yes , then I am amazed at your ignorance. Read about DSP systems and AVLSI which form the core of the ESM modules and DTRX modules of the BTS sites, before commenting like a moron.
The article intends to say that China and India are emerging as big consumers of IT. It is not talking about the IT companies of the countries. Moreover the examples that you have quoted are "Telecom companies". They are not IT companies but hardware making companies. Even big Telecom players...