Search results

Trolls don't bother me at all, neither should you let them bother you. In any case the whole point of having a web site is to generate traffic. Content be damned.

The exact term is "pea brain".

The 1962 border war was meant to teach India a lesson, or else India would continue to treat Chinese restraint as weakness. As for withdrawing after routing the Indian army it was due to logistics. China simply did not have the infrastructure in Tibet to adequately keep the troops supplied.

This troll is a false flagger for sure. Years ago he was dumb enough to respond to my questioning in "Chinese" using google translate.

This is a very unusual narrative of the series of events leading to the 1962 Sino-Indian border war.

Don't even bother with him. He's a brown-skin American at best.

He was being facetious. Seriously though, Chinese men's soccer has been a joke for at least 30 years. The problems are systemic and the situation is hopeless . BTW congratulations to Vietnam.

How about "Hindi Chini Buy Buy"?

A major conflict is indeed extremely unlikely. From what I hear from Chinese military analysts, even though India screams loud and talks tough and has sent a large number of troops to the LAC , it's mostly posturing targeted at its domestic audience.

As far as China is concerned, India is merely a side show. We have much bigger better things to occupy ourselves with than India. As you have noticed China has hardly made any statements in the year and half following the Galwan incident. For a repeat of 1962 or worse Indian provocation would...

This is merely a teaser. There is plenty more to be released, depending on Indian behavior. There is for instance the video of the actual physical clash and Indian deaths were several times higher than the officially admitted number of 20. We may get to see all this if next time around India...

Wrong comparison for sure. Germans lost but they fought well and they were worthy opponents. Can the same be said of Indians?

Do you actually buy all this Indian nonsense? The two ships and their sailors are free to leave. It's just that the ships can not unload the Australian coal they carry.

There has been no objection to characterizing Modi as a statesman rather than a politician. Future looks good when a statesman is in charge of a complex relationship between China and India.

Came across a really interesting video in which an Indian said things that have probably never been said before. Check out what an "anti-national" has to say, and he is all praises for Modi.

There was no intrusion. There is no intrusion. Anti-nationals are being their mischievous selves again.

Probably Indian, definitely closet Indian.

It's best just to ignore him. He may have Chinese ethnicity but he does not have Chinese nationality. He's one of those "banana" types that love to ride the moral high horse. It appears that he became all-knowing, much the same way the Indian media is.

Much more than annoying---arrogant, overbearing and demeaning towards its smaller neighbors. Take Nepal for example. A college classmate of mine served as a Chinese diplomat in Kathmandu. He told me about Indian ambassador's abhorrent behavior in Nepal---barging into Nepali' government offices...