First off all Army not deployed in cities .. Army is for Border safety there . In cities Local police and CRPF working not Army.
India cant reduce Army presence there you know why .:disagree:
Some award that Janata Bank won
* Best Bank-Bangladesh 2008 by Global Finance" magazine
* Best Bank-Bangladesh 2007 by Global Finance magazine
* Best Bank-Bangladesh 2006 by Global Finance magazine
* Asian Banking Awards 2005 by Asian Bankers Association (ABA)
*...
I think its batter than take lunch with terrorist like Pakistani soldiers their are lots of videos that show that .. and lot other where Pakistani soldier surrender in front of terrorist ... which one is batter
If i am going to post any think so mod will delete them all ...
So enjoy photos...
We dnt need Army in eastern border BSF is sufficient there cause they dnt send terrorist in our country
On the other hand whole world know who is behind terrorism in Kashmir that the reason we need army there
Dude if you want to say that they can threat Israel with Ghauri 2 type BM so i dnt think without nukes that threaten to any one ... cause Turkey right now dnt have nukes but Israel have ... whole world know that
Thats not troll its a big fact .
In last 60 years Kashmir is still in India and never go away ....
Pakistan got 4 defeats in trying to capture kashmir from India and now start send terrorist to kill innocent in J&K ...
All kashmiri are angry our this act of Pakistan now terrorist want to make violence in Kahsmir
That thing applicable for Pakistan army in FATA and northern areas ... This suits you batter ..... We are able to manage batter than you
And second thing "A few hundred not represent whole kashmir"" ....
those few hundreds are paid by terrorists ..