Search results

How'd you know it's nuclear? We can't conclude anything at this time.

F-16 uses humans as pilots, which limits maneuverability due to reaction time as well has biological limitations such as g-force caps, which must be taken into account. Hence, missiles are capable of much tighter turns.

self delete

Attentive but dismissive, we know well and clear what the T-50 is capable of, and to be frank, there's nothing to be concerned of seeing the development and pace it is at today.

No, get your reading and your mindset straight before you respond. If you consider taking the "flying wing" design all copies of that Nazi contraption, then surely by Indian logic all fixed wing designs are mere copies of one another. Hence by that standard, F-14=Su27 and Mig-21=F-86, am I not...

Let me get this straight, just because Northrop used the flying wing configuration made the B2 a mere copy? In that case, the MKI is a copy of the F-14 and the Tejas a copy of the J-10. No, your logic is flawed. When the basic shape is adopted for the basis of development, it cannot be called a...

Why would I care if you guys choose to screw yourselves up, it's your choice.

Up to you, choose to be ripped off or choose better quality+better price all in one package.

Seeing by the attitude of many people on the forums and the things in Indian media which people post, it is clear India is taking offense at other nations' military buildups and is acting aggressively "thinking" that it will be attacked. In short, its pessimism and cynicalism prevents the...

@ Cisco Guy

You are already in the Russian camp. You've devoted the majority to benefiting Russia while you have limited access to blueprints which you paid for.

This shows how much knowledge you have in this area. If you want to refute my claim, give me reason. Not haha hehe huuhuu's and lol's rofl rofl bounce bounce bounce. Hahahahaaa, you're so funny, so a crazy Indian behind 2 UN flags got to you huh? Anyone can manipulate my past posts and add...

Except India can only master the basics which is given, and hasn't the ability to develop nor think outside the box in order to advance itself.

Hypocritical are you? Why did you respond to my matters if your bandwidth is out of your financial ground?

You have successfully avoided answering my question completely. I asked, why is there a need for India to arm itself to the extent it has when there are hardly any threats from formidable foes. You, my friend, have turned my questions into warmonger statements.

Am I America or its policy makers? I think not. I am free to represent myself and my views, so why are you being so defensive? I can be American without the need to act and behave the same way as Bush or Obama.

Hahahahahaha... ARE YOU SERIOUS?!

We are in a situation where we can't break the cycle of each annual defence expenditure. Economically speaking, if we cut down on our spending, everything we've set up and accomplished overseas would fall to rubble. Is India in such a situation whereas it has invested trillions in setting up...

It's a political game, neither of the 2 countries would wage war against the other, but still, should that day come, both need to be prepared. Pakistan terrorists? So 34% increase is for counter-terrorism? So China and Pakistan are threatening war with India, wow that's news to my ears. Quit...

Well you got to be the biggest joker on the forum, and a hypocritical one too, on one hand, you say that you're pro-US, on the other hand, you constantly insult the nation and its policy makers, not just Bush, but ALL of them. Here's something for you: Composite Index of National Capability -...