Search results

100 years ago, the concept of "we" was nonexistent. Today, that "we" remains elusive. It was "them" in the bygone century, and it remains "them" today, albeit with a deeper hue..... "we" don't possess nuclear capabilities; it is "them" who hold this power. The intricate dynamics of...

Once again, my friend, it's not about your interpretation of "Kafir." It is explicitly stated in 2:4 that the disbelievers or Kafir referred to in 2:6 are those who reject what has been revealed to the prophet (i.e., the Quran), disbelieve in what was revealed before the Quran, and lack faith in...

I'm aware, but since he asserts to be a fellow believer and has referenced the Quran, I believe it is our responsibility to highlight the evident errors in his expressed standpoint

I'm merely quoting verses from the Quran—refer to 2:6 and 2:14. Unless you genuinely believe that your understanding of Islam surpasses Allah's wisdom, your argument holds no merit. Sectarian hatred seems to have clouded your judgment to the extent of rejecting the Quran. May Allah guide us all.

It's not a matter of your understanding of Islam, or anyone else's for that matter. These verses explicitly refer to those who openly or secretly express their disbelief. I encourage you to read these verses carefully and seek forgiveness and guidance from Allah.

Exercise caution, mate. That verse (2:18) specifically addresses open disbelievers (2:6) and self-admitted rejectors/ hypocrites (2:14). Applying these verses to anyone who is a believer, irrespective of their understanding of Islam, amounts to a rejection of the Quran itself.

One and a half month!! The duffers crafting the script committed another error. Regarding the duration of the Iddat period, the matter has already been settled by the Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of "Allahdad v. Mukhtar" (1992) confirming that the Iddat period lasts for 39 days.

The extensive propaganda surrounding May 9th has backfired on the Army, eroding their credibility to the point where they are no longer taken seriously by anyone

Yet another clueless Nasibi confidently discussing matters far beyond the scope of his understanding. The discourse here doesn't delve into theology, nor has anyone endorsed Shia theological stances on Imamat etc. We're simply discussing historical facts, drawing from books and sources widely...

Take your time, my friend. I'll await your response, and I hope it won't be the typical copy-paste of tons of irrelevant content from substandard blogs. Feel free to share the link directly.

No, there's no mistranslation involved. In fact 5924 in Sahih Muslim clearly elaborates that "sab-o-shitam" refers to abusing/cursing and not criticism. Unless of course you are trying to imply that there are weak Ahadith in Sahih Muslim, you don't have an argument here And there are several...

For starters: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umayyad_tradition_of_cursing_Ali ,....... https://sunnah.com/muslim:2404d

Abusing the Sahaba is an abhorrent act, universally condemned, and no rational individual would endorse such behavior. Mirza says (a sentiment I share) that abusing the Sahaba is an inexcusable offense. And those who, for five decades, openly disparaged Ali and the prophet's progeny from mosque...

So, you acknowledge your inability to respond to a straightforward question I posed in my previous post and have opted for name-calling instead. Nothing more to discuss here "Let everybody know that if the love of Prophet Muhammad's descendants means to be a Rafizi, I am a Rafizi. -(Imam...

Then prove it by specifying which points in my post lack support from Sahi Hadith, and I'll willingly acknowledge it. If you can't, refrain from labeling others as Shia when, in reality, you align with the Nasibi/ Deobandi faction, falsely presenting yourself as a representative of mainstream...

Every point in these posts is grounded in Sahi Hadith, and if you detect "Rafiziat," the issue doesn't lie with these posts but with any latent dislike you may hold toward Ali and the prophet's progeny. This represents a fundamental inconsistency in the Ahl us Sunnah Mullahs' position...

In my view, shaped by my reading and comprehension of history, the mistreatment of the progeny of the prophet can be traced from Saqifah to Fadak, Jamal to Safeen, and ultimately to Kerbala. These events are interconnected in some way, with each serving as a precursor to the next.... nothing...

You have every right to your opinions and beliefs. And no, your perspective is not radical; in fact, it stands out as the most logical. From a purely historical standpoint, no one has faced greater consistent injustices in Islamic history than the progeny of the prophet.

The internet has changed things for Mullahs, similar to how the printing press changed things for the Church in the 15th century. Mullahs don't have the exclusive control over Islamic information anymore, as with the ready availability of diverse references online now anyone can easily access...

They are unable to challenge Mirza's scholarly arguments, which rely entirely on accounts and sources validated by the Mullahs themselves (which they consistently attempt to conceal and intentionally overlook). Closet Nasibis and other sects inclined toward Najd harbor resentment against Mirza...