Should The Pakistan Navy Get a New Base near Karachi?

FuturePAF said:

As the old Axiom goes "Amateurs think about tactics, but professionals think about logistics", IMHO The Pakistan Navy needs a new modern base outside of Karachi Harbor.

The current base doesn't even allow ships to be spread out in case of possible attack. They are currently sitting ducks tied together and in a predictable position. While there is no current threat, a threat could emerge. I believe the PN needs to request a new base, west of the Karachi.

An ideal location would be the mountainous coast line just north of "Khohri Butwala", approximately 30 km from the current Karachi base. Not only will it allow a wider area to spread out its ships on a war footing, it would be an idea location (due to the 400 foot tall mountains) to house submarines in reinforced pens like the swedes do and the soviets did.
http://i.imgur.com/lQ7S7pt.jpg
https://moiarussia.ru/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/70_full-e1447466145614.jpg
http://www.histarmar.com.ar/InfHistorica-5/ArmadaSueca-AEnglish/undergrbase-2.jpg
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/17/14/1a/17141adb7ae4bb2f0f965b76a99d365f.jpg
http://www.dispatch.com/content/sto...-base-trades-cold-war-fears-for-tourists.html
http://www.bornrich.com/secret-submarine-base-sale-175-million.html
This is also important if the navy is to assume a portion of the strategic deterrence role. This last point goes hand in hand for the need to maintain security in the event of sabotage. On September 6, 2014 PNS Zulfiqar was attacked by miscreants seeking to use it against ships in the Arabian sea. Even prospect of such an attack on a Pakistan naval vessel housing strategic assets would send shock waves around the world and bring international pressure on Pakistan regarding its deterrence. Pakistan needs to preempt this by building a new facility in a location such as I have mentioned. A base similar to the Indian one at karwar, just scaled and modified to our needs would be what I envision, The PN needs to replace the small and outgrown one in Karachi Harbor.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/al-qaeda-militants-tried-to-seize-pakistan-navy-frigate-1410884514

Click to expand...

Taha Samad said:

Jinnah Naval Base, Ormara is already there. Overtime I will have more assets & probably expanded.

Click to expand...

Muhammad Omar said:

Why don't at Keti Bandar ??

Click to expand...

Penguin said:

Jinnah Naval Base is situated about 240 km west (149 miles) of Karachi at Ormara in Pakistan's Balochistan province. By land, via the Makran Coastal Highway it is 350 km (217.48 miles) from Karachi and 285 km from Gwadar. So, that's a little different.

The advantage of Karachi, with ships concentrated, is that base security may be easier. I like the ideas of reinforced submarine pens: for a force with a strategic role, this would be a must. But 240km west of Karachi might be less prone to air attack and/or easier to protect from it.

Click to expand...

1. Midway between Gwader & Karachi.
2. As you mentioned, farther from Eastern Border, so more safe in terms of Air Attack. Makes sea based attack a bit more difficult, since IN assets have to travel more distance for sea based attack.
3. Ormara isn't a big city itself so with right planning its easier to secure base from by terrorist/sabotage attack. One of the issues with Karachi is that Naval Base in right next to Commercial Port. Similarly PNS Mehran, Karachi is surrounded by highly populated area.
4. Steep Mountain just south of base. You can even see it on google earth.
5. This mountain to the south can be used for pens.

FuturePAF said:

Actually this would be worse then the current karachi base
it would be too close to enemy forces as to be within range of their assets, while having most of your logistical support far away
secondly the terrain is not helpful (indus delta is not the best to build a large base on) while the mountains west of karachi can house sub pens and even pens large enough for frigates and patrol boats

finally the quick access to deep water and its different layers will allows subs to hide there faster, while allowing surfe vessels to turn easily, shallow water bases have the risk of running aground, such as happened to hms astute
http://img.thesun.co.uk/aidemitlum/archive/01172/nany-main_1172347a.jpg

Click to expand...

Penguin said:

Jinnah Naval Base is situated about 240 km west (149 miles) of Karachi at Ormara in Pakistan's Balochistan province. By land, via the Makran Coastal Highway it is 350 km (217.48 miles) from Karachi and 285 km from Gwadar. So, that's a little different.

The advantage of Karachi, with ships concentrated, is that base security may be easier. I like the ideas of reinforced submarine pens: for a force with a strategic role, this would be a must. But 240km west of Karachi might be less prone to air attack and/or easier to protect from it.

Click to expand...

Penguin said:

Jinnah Naval Base is situated about 240 km west (149 miles) of Karachi at Ormara in Pakistan's Balochistan province. By land, via the Makran Coastal Highway it is 350 km (217.48 miles) from Karachi and 285 km from Gwadar. So, that's a little different.

The advantage of Karachi, with ships concentrated, is that base security may be easier. I like the ideas of reinforced submarine pens: for a force with a strategic role, this would be a must. But 240km west of Karachi might be less prone to air attack and/or easier to protect from it.

Click to expand...

CriticalThought said:

I never knew about the 2014 attacks on a frigate. This is highly disconcerting.

Yes, we need to think about external threats and countering them with distributed assets, but with a thousand apologies, at the cost of derailing the thread, we need to really think about base security. From the past few years:

1. Attack on GHQ. I MEAN GHQ. SERIOUSLY?
2. Attack on POF. Backbone of our ammo production.
3. Attack on PAC Kamra. Backbone of JF-17
4. Attack on PNS Mehran. Actual aircraft destroyed.
5. Attack on an actual Navy warship.

And many more that I probably don't even remember, or know about. I mean this is appalling. Hopefully, we are stronger now as a result of these attacks and have learnt our lessons. But still, the question begs to be asked, were we sleeping before? Do we conduct regular security tests where a completely independent team tries to break into major infrastructure? Did heads roll after these attacks?

The perpetrators of these attacks need to be traced back to source. It is NOT OK to just kill the people involved in these attacks. AT ALL COSTS their planners, financiers, masterminds, handlers, the whole gang MUST BE TRACKED AND THEN ELIMINATED. And if the attack is traced back to a state, then this should be considered an act of war.

I know people behind the scenes do a lot. But for attacks of such public nature, we need to see public results. Just relying on 'people are working behind the scenes' is not good enough in these cases.

Click to expand...