Woman hires thugs to teach ‘cheating’ husband a lesson

Spring Onion said:

did the police find or even tried to find if he was really cheating his wife.

Click to expand...

Thats not police concern..if a woman does not want to live with him..she can ask for divorce...Pakistani women behave as if they own the man..

somebozo said:

Thats not police concern..if a woman does not want to live with him..she can ask for divorce...Pakistani women behave as if they own the man..

Click to expand...

cheating is not at all appreciated by women the worlwide. is it not about Pakistan only. divorce is the last step in every society.

Spring Onion said:

cheating is not at all appreciated by women the worlwide. is it not about Pakistan only. divorce is the last step in every society.

Click to expand...

Cheating is not appreciated does not mean taking law into hand...the option of asking divorce is always open..but women do not want that as well..in Pakistan..the culture of marriage is simply abuse of male at the hands of women..women want a piggy bank and reproduce to create their future insurance policy..it is a heavily female dominated social structure..and hence why Pakistani men are becoming "khassi" aka impotent...to such an extent that every wall is painted..Mardana kamzori ka shartia elaj...and arbio jaisi taqat hasil karen sirf teen din ma...

somebozo said:

It depends on how good the woman has kept herself..some women are worth legalizing cheating...

Click to expand...

same goes for men. if a man can not respect his marriage then he should walkout of the bond instead of cheating. as you were suggesting that to women.

What kind of woman knows where to hire hitmen from?

NakedLunch said:

What kind of woman knows where to hire hitmen from?

Click to expand...

what is the big deal ? and what do you mean by what kind of a woman?

Spring Onion said:

what is the big deal ? and what do you mean by what kind of a woman?

Click to expand...

A hitman. Someone who murders for money. What kind of man or woman would have anything to do with a hitman? It is a big deal. Murdering for money is a huge deal. In the UK just talking about getting someone killed for money can get you life in prison. So, yes it is a big deal.

NakedLunch said:

A hitman. Someone who murders for money. What kind of man or woman would have anything to do with a hitman? It is a big deal. Murdering for money is a huge deal. In the UK just talking about getting someone killed for money can get you life in prison. So, yes it is a big deal.

Click to expand...

now you have used the word man too earlier you were suggesting as if bad women can hire such people. anyway the news suggests she asked the husband of her friend to teach her husband a lesson and he hired these thugs not killers.

Spring Onion said:

now you have used the word man too earlier you were suggesting as if bad women can hire such people. anyway the news suggests she asked the husband of her friend to teach her husband a lesson and he hired these thugs not killers.

Click to expand...

What are you talking about? Excuse me, but hiring someone to murder somebody is not just conspiracy to murder in most jurisdictions but can also be construed as terrorism in the light of recent legislation all over the world.. Which part of that do you not understand? In the UK you can go to prison for just having a conversation with people who make themselves known as hitmen. I cant understand why you would defend someone who would know someone like that? Am I dreaming? LOL! Bro, what kind of perosn, in this case a WOMAN, would know how to get involved wth a hitman? And if that hitman was the friend of her husband, what the hell knid of family was that? LOL!!!! I cant believe I am having this conversation.

Spring Onion said:

did the police find or even tried to find if he was really cheating his wife.

Click to expand...

What's that got to do with the case? The case is that a husband got tortured and a neighbor got hit with a bullet. The accused are the wife and her aide's.

Reverse the situation. Consider if a woman was tortured by a man who "suspected" she was cheating on him. Consider the same occurred in this supposition, i.e. the husband went to a friend and asked him to hire contract killers to teach the wife a lesson etc. The wife gets tortured and reports the violence to the police while another neighbor (a woman for this supposition), is injured due to gun fire. Police find the weapons and arrests occur etc.
Do you at any point, in this supposition ask " Did the police find out if the wife was cheating?"

I don't think so. It is almost as if we, as a society somehow someway have to victimize women even if they are perpetrators of the worst kind of actions ..

Spring Onion said:

cheating is not at all appreciated by women the worlwide. is it not about Pakistan only. divorce is the last step in every society

Click to expand...

Hold on a second! ... Are you seriously suggesting that assault, torture and hiring contract killers to "teach the husband a lesson" are a step before divorce?

abdulbarijan said:

What's that got to do with the case? The case is that a husband got tortured and a neighbor got hit with a bullet. The accused are the wife and her aide's.

Reverse the situation. Consider if a woman was tortured by a man who "suspected" she was cheating on him. Consider the same occurred in this supposition, i.e. the husband went to a friend and asked him to hire contract killers etc. The wife gets tortured and reports the violence to the police while another neighbor (a woman for this supposition), is injured due to gun fire. Police find the weapons and arrests occur etc.

Do you at any point, in this supposition ask " Did the police find out if the wife was cheating?", or is that we as a society somehow have to victimize women even if they are perpetrators of the worst kind of actions ?

Click to expand...

lolzz aa gaya. well
1. what happened is a crime so the law came into action.
2. a crime is a crime be it committed by a man or woman.
so the situation is clear there is no other opinion on that.
now any investigator or for that matter if the case goes to a court, the first thing which would be investigated would be if the allegation of cheating on part of the husband is true or not. am interested to know about the authenticity of the factor behind this crime. what is wrong with that?

Skyliner said:

I demand MEN protection Bill 2017

Women with shak ke bemari are the worst kind

Click to expand...

hahahaha seriously bas is bill ki kami ha

Spring Onion said:

lolzz aa gaya. well
1. what happened is a crime so the law came into action.
2. a crime is a crime be it committed by a man or woman.
so the situation is clear there is no other opinion on that.
now any investigator or for that matter if the case goes to a court, the first thing which would be investigated would be if the allegation of cheating on part of the husband is true or not. am interested to know about the authenticity of the factor behind this crime. what is wrong with that?

Click to expand...

Nothing wrong with that if your talking in terms of the investigation determining the whole story. Now I take it your very first response, if a similar thread with the genders reversed were posted (where a woman gets tortured / a husband is the perpetrator because he suspected the wife of cheating) would be ... "Did an investigation occur to determine if the wife really cheat?"

Secondly, an investigation will have to determine a whole range of more important things. e.g.
(a) Were the weapons seized legal? If not, how were they obtained?
(b) How did an innocent bystander in this case the neighbor get shot?
(c) How did the wife convince the friend, to have her husband hire contract killers? (as the other family will give their own reasoning as to why they did what they did. They were coerced etc.)
(d) Investigating the link between the contract killers and the guy who hired them etc etc.

abdulbarijan said:

Nothing wrong with that. Now I take it your very first response, if a similar thread with the genders reversed were posted (where a woman gets tortured / a husband is the perpetrator because he suspected the wife of cheating) would be ... "Did an investigation occur to determine if the wife.

Click to expand...

i would have asked the same question even in that case. btw you are one nashukra mard who still cries even if one supports his views. mehhhhhhhhhh why why? lagta hay bohat hee saray howay ho aurton k hathon

Spring Onion said:

i would have asked the same question even in that case. btw you are one nashukra mard who still cries even if one supports his views. mehhhhhhhhhh why why? lagta hay bohat hee saray howay ho aurton k hathon

Click to expand...

I don't really think we agree. For one I don't think finding out if the husband cheated is a big part of this case. It can be in the perspective of "knowing the entire story" however, other than that, I don't think it has much significance, since what happened cannot be termed as a "crime of passion" because the crime was premeditated and concocted by the wife.The reason why I kept asking you that "Would you react the same way if the genders were reversed" question was because, I know for a fact a certain bandwagon would have been crying and shouting "blaming the victim" ... if the same question were put up with the situations reversed. Good to see your not one of em.

Secondly, In a reply to @somebozo you stated

Spring Onion said:

cheating is not at all appreciated by women the worlwide. is it not about Pakistan only. divorce is the last step in every society.

Click to expand...

So is like torturing/ physical assault/hiring contract killers a step before the last step i.e. divorce?