Successful Babur-3 test gives Pakistan ticket to elite nuke triad club

pakistanipower said:

stop it stop it,it is tooooo much, i can't stop laughing at you for your nonsense, it is over capability for pakistan, Israel is already within a range of our Shaheen-3, and no need for SLBM, we have babur-3 for that wait some years then babur-3 will have a range of 1500-2000 Km that enough for Israel, S-3 with a 3-4 warheads, with suitable penetration aids and with MARS warheads can do the job easily

Click to expand...

You seem to a strong pessimist no? What I described would be perfect for Pak strategically speaking however S3 sea variant would among the worst SLBMs I know off...

Starlord said:

@Rashid Mahmood @Horus @Khafee brothers, can we say that this Babur 3 with range of 450KM can and will also be used to fire from the newly Designed Azmat Class FAC ? in new Design they show a Round shaped Tubed Launchers 3x2 on back hall of the Ship .. and this Babur Variant is also fired from a Torpedo Tube ( Possibly Round shaped ) so it could happen right ??

Click to expand...

Babur III with a nuclear warhead are strategic in nature and have a specific role to play, hence they will only be used from Subs.

Also such an expensive Cruise missile will not be installed on an FAC.

If PN goes for a DDG with area air defence capability, then maybe they can install the Babur III with conventional warhead only.

EpiiC said:

You seem to a strong pessimist no? What I described would be perfect for Pak strategically speaking however S3 sea variant would among the worst SLBMs I know off...

Click to expand...

No i am not, i lives in realty, you lives in your wet dreams, fantasy world and fairy tales, go suggest your crap to PAKISTAN MILITARY ESTABLISHMENT and they will kick out on your butts, and where are the sea variants of S-3 kid, kid this place is not for yours go play your toys

pakistanipower said:

No i am not, i lives in realty, you lives in your wet dreams, fantasy world and fairy tales, go suggest your crap to PAKISTAN MILITARY ESTABLISHMENT and they will kick out on your butts, and where are the sea variants of S-3 kid, kid this place is not for yours go play your toys

Click to expand...

For a 39 year old female you do seem to have an obessession with wet dreams and fantasies.... we currently don't have slbm and I say we shouldn't have the worse slbm when we do have one... Currently our missiles have the lowest range out of 9 Nuclear weapons state.

pakistanipower said:

No bro we don't need an ICBM we have no global ambitions

Click to expand...

Why not? If Pakistan had ICBM then could the US (allegedly) have threatened Pakistan after 9/11?

pakistanipower said:

ICBM for what purpose? our enemy is not 10,000 km from Pakistan

Click to expand...

Nobody thinks like that. Although these weapons aren't going to used but only for deterrence. As a nuclear state you have to get all the means you can to deliver your Nukes. Even your neighbors have this capabilities, so why not ?

Gregor Clegane said:

Indian Navy confirms launch took place from a platform and not submarine:

https://www.google.co.in/amp/m.ndtv.com/india-news/pakistans-video-of-babur-missile-launch-fake-navy-sources-tell-ndtv-1647215?amp=1&akamai-rum=off?client=ms-android-samsung

Click to expand...

Slowly and surely the hangover the clouded indian media is now ending, The started the to see the reality!
PS: indian Friends get ready Indian median will tell you all the truth in a slowly administered manners.

EpiiC said:

we currently don't have slbm

Click to expand...

WE don't need an ICBM or SLBM, ICBM and SLBM has big RADAR and IR RCS can easily be intercepted in mid flight or mid course before bus spereted MIRV warheads, whereas CM is more stealthy with low IR and RADAR RCS and its mask with terrain has additional advantages, and it is difficult to intercept as compare to BM, i am reporting you for you baseless rants with no prove but this is just your wish full thinking

Anish said:

Their statement has already said it was a underwater launch platform..
They don't have any capable nuclear submarine in operation till they buy it from China..It's a long long way..

Click to expand...

Pakistan never claimed to have one.

SarthakGanguly said:

Indian and Hindu extermination is now inevitable. Congrats.

Click to expand...

No we do not think about Hindu and Indian extermination, we just want them(Indians) to stay away from Pakistan+Kashmir. They can enjoy their lives, their culture, their religion. we are not willing to sent anyone from India to Hell or Heaven unless forced upon.

Awan68 said:

So ur here too laughing at people, this asshole is an indian troll pretending to be a pakistani..

Click to expand...

Mate I agree this one really seems to be trolling us all check her stats out 39 years old female, lol....

Death Walking Terror said:

None of them are French.
Also since Taiwan doesn't have nukes it's not a problem.

In fact during the signing of submarine deals both India and Pakistan were told by France not to station nukes on them.

Click to expand...

Right...,so I presume that the french are now going to start inspecting pakistani and indian subs to make sure they`re not in violation of this request?.Conditions like this arent worth the paper they`re printed on,plus I would think that like most of the worlds nuclear navies the pakistanies would probably have a dont ask,dont tell policy of nuclear ambiguity when it came to the status of any possible nuclear weapons on their vessels.

EpiiC said:

Mate I agree this one really seems to be trolling us all check her stats out 39 years old female, lol....

Click to expand...

Yep was nagging me on another thread about how we will never be able to develop a blue water navy in 20 yrs or that such a notion is a joke now here i find him putting down notions of icbms etc, definately a wet indian troll.

Awan68 said:

Yep was nagging me on another thread about how we will never be able to develop a blue water navy in 20 yrs or that such a notion is a joke now here i find him putting down notions of icbms etc, definately a wet indian troll.

Click to expand...

Yes all I was saying is that a real nuclear detterent is an SSBN/SLBM/ICBM even if your land based nukes are destroyed your sea submarine will give you 2nd second strike nuclear retaliation ability.... ICBMs are also faster at mach 22+ plus with slbm icbm we can be near GCC OR near china or near occeina and lauch nukes without getting detected close by!! It gives us strategic detternce and global firepower!!

EpiiC said:

Yes all I was saying is that a real nuclear detterent is an SSBN/SLBM/ICBM even if your land based nukes are destroyed your sea submarine will give you 2nd second strike nuclear retaliation ability.... ICBMs are also faster at mach 22+ plus with slbm icbm we can be near GCC OR near china or near occeina and lauch nukes without getting detected close by!! It gives us strategic detternce and global firepower!!

Click to expand...

Yep i agree and so do pakistani defence circles, contrary to what some say we have global designs and when powerful enough we will project global power as we are an ideological state..

TMA said:

So if Pakistan had this capability when (allegedly) the Bush administration threatened Musharrag after the false flags of 9/11, the US would not have used such tone?

Click to expand...

Actions speak louder than words, even North Korea threatens US every other day, however Pak/US relations may swing side to side but never to the extent of going to a war.