What's new

China conducts 6th test of Hypersonic Glide Vehicle

Chinese-Dragon

RETIRED TTA
Joined
Jul 9, 2010
Messages
33,932
Reaction score
52
Country
China
Location
China
China Again Tests Nuclear Hypersonic Missile - Washington Free Beacon

China carried out a sixth flight test of its new high-speed nuclear attack vehicle on Monday designed to defeat U.S. missile defenses or carry out global strikes.

The ultra-fast maneuvering strike weapon known as the DF-ZF hypersonic glide vehicle was launched atop a ballistic missile fired from the Wuzhai missile test center in central China’s Shanxi Province, according defense officials.

The vehicle separated from its launcher near the edge of the atmosphere and then glided to an impact range several thousand miles away in western China, said officials familiar with details of the test.

The DF-ZF flight was tracked by U.S. intelligence agencies and flew at speeds beyond Mach 5, or five times the speed of sound.

Pentagon spokesman Cmdr. Bill Urban declined to comment. “We do not comment on specific PRC weapons tests, but we do monitor Chinese military modernization carefully,” Urban told the Washington Free Beacon.

It was the sixth time the hypersonic glider has been flight tested since last year.

The website China Spaceflight reported Sunday that the test would take place, based on the Chinese government announcement of airspace closures along what would ultimately become the zone used by the glide vehicle during the flight test. The website reported that the airspace restrictions were similar to closures announced prior to an August DF-ZF flight test.


Flight path of the test / China Space Flight

The airspace was closed to commercial and military air traffic between 12:53 a.m. and 1:40 a.m. Beijing time on Nov. 23—the likely timeframe of the test.

China’s most recent DF-ZF test took place Aug. 19, also from Wuzhai, and like Monday’s flight test was judged a success.

U.S. intelligence agencies have assessed the DF-ZF to be a nuclear delivery vehicle for Chinese missiles, with maneuverability and high speeds that would allow it to defeat U.S. missile defenses, currently designed to counter non-maneuvering warheads with more easily-tracked ballistic trajectories.

China also could use the DF-ZF for conventional-armed rapid global strike capability, according to military specialists.

The vehicle is believed to reach speeds of between Mach 5 and Mach 10, or 3,836 miles per hour and 7,680 miles per hour.

The high rate of testing for the glide vehicle is an indication China has placed a high priority on the weapon program and that it is making rapid progress.

The Chinese conducted earlier flight tests on June 7, and on Jan. 9, 2014, Aug. 7, 2014, and Dec. 2, 2014. All the tests were first reported by the Free Beacon.

The commander of the U.S. Strategic Command told reporters last summer that hypersonic glide vehicles are new strategic warfare technology and an emerging threat.

“As I look at that [hypersonic] threat, clearly the mobility, the flight profile, those kinds of things are things we have to keep in mind and be able to address across that full kill chain,” Cecil Haney said in an interview in July, using the military term for the process used to target and attack enemy missiles.

Air Force Lt. Gen. James Kowalski, then-deputy commander of Strategic Command, said at the same time that hypersonic missiles offer a number of advantages as strategic weapons.

“It offers a number of different ways to overcome defenses, whether those are conventional, or if someone would decide to use a nuclear warhead, I think gives it an even more complicated dimension,” Kowalski said.

Currently, no nation has deployed hypersonic weapons but “it remains something that concerns us,” Kowalski added.

The annual report of the congressional U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, made public Nov. 18, stated that China’s hypersonic weapons are in the developmental stages and are “progressing rapidly.” The glide vehicle could be deployed by 2020, and a separate high-technology ramjet-propelled cruise missile could be deployed by 2025, the report said.

The Mach 5 to Mach 10 speeds allow the arms to “strike any target on earth in under an hour,” it stated.

“The very high speeds of these weapons, combined with their maneuverability and ability to travel at lower, radar-evading altitudes, would make them far less vulnerable than existing missiles to current missile defenses,” the report said.

The report said China’s hypersonic weapons, as well as the use of multiple-warhead missiles, are part of China’s efforts to assure its missiles can penetrate U.S. missile defenses.

Nuclear-armed hypersonic vehicles would be part of China’s retaliatory strike capabilities, while conventionally-tipped hypersonics could indicate long-range conventional strikes.

“Alternatively, China may intend its hypersonic program for both nuclear and conventional purposes, or may simply be following the United States in pushing the technological frontier and is not yet certain which it will pursue,” the report said.

China is among three nations that are developing hypersonic arms, along with Russia and the United States.

Rick Fisher, a senior fellow at the International Assessment and Strategy Center, said the sixth test indicates Beijing may be seeking a conventional rapid global attack capability similar to the developmental U.S. program called Prompt Global Strike.

Fisher said analysis of Chinese solid fueled space launchers indicates the new Kuaizhou-2 launcher could be used with China’s anti-satellite missiles and also could boost the DF-ZF to intercontinental ranges.

“It is possible that Kuaizhou-2 could become the basis for China’s first intercontinental non-nuclear armed Prompt Global Strike delivery vehicle,” he said, adding the booster “could likely carry multiple DF-ZF derived hypersonic maneuvering precision strike warheads.”

China also is building and deploying sophisticated surveillance satellites that could be used for the precision global strike weapons.

With some 138 satellites in space by 2030, “this means that an intercontinental [Prompt Global Strike] launched from China against U.S. targets could benefit from multiple target location updates,” he said.

Since China has refused to negotiate limits on its strategic weapons and remains highly secretive about all its arms programs, “the safe course for Washington would be to avoid any further delay in developing its own Prompt Global Strike capability to deploy if China does the same.”

---------------------------

Interesting part:

“It is possible that Kuaizhou-2 could become the basis for China’s first intercontinental non-nuclear armed Prompt Global Strike delivery vehicle,” he said, adding the booster “could likely carry multiple DF-ZF derived hypersonic maneuvering precision strike warheads.”

Maybe we'll be the first country in the world to deploy operational HGV? :partay:

Would be a nice record to have, after all we were the first in the world to deploy operational ASBM as well (DF-21D and DF-26).
 
Last edited:
According to the diplomat, China still needs at least 2 decades to deploy this weapon, and it is only equivalent to the 1960s US technology, blahblahblah.

Let them living in their own fantasy world and keep masturbating, while we will advance steadily with step by step. :enjoy:
 
According to the diplomat, China still needs at least 2 decades to deploy this weapon, and it is only equivalent to the 1960s US technology, blahblahblah.

Let them living in their own fantasy world and keep masturbating, while we will advance steadily with step by step. :enjoy:

If you check the past predictions, they thought China's GDP would only surpass Japan's by 2020, and they thought we would only be able to build a prototype of a 5th generation jet fighter by 2030. :rofl: And they were absolutely blindsided by DF-21D.

I love those predictions. :enjoy:

@TaiShang, @Edison Chen, @terranMarine, @Wolfwind, @Jlaw (I think I can only mention 5 before the system stops giving notifications), and others, what do you guys think?

When do you think we will be able to deploy operational HGV capability? Will we be the first in the world, like we were with ASBM (DF-21D and DF-26)?

Of course having global strike capability is only a part of the chain, but it is an important part. Due to the sheer speed of this platform, even a conventional warhead could act as a bunker-buster against hardened targets like command and control, secret weapons facilities, etc.
 
If you check the past predictions, they thought China's GDP would only surpass Japan's by 2020, and they thought we would only be able to build a prototype of a 5th generation jet fighter by 2030. :rofl: And they were absolutely blindsided by DF-21D.

I love those predictions. :enjoy:

@TaiShang, @Edison Chen, @terranMarine, @Wolfwind, @Jlaw (I think I can only mention 5 before the system stops giving notifications), and others, what do you guys think?

When do you think we will be able to deploy operational HGV capability? Will we be the first in the world, like we were with ASBM (DF-21D and DF-26)?

Of course having global strike capability is only a part of the chain, but it is an important part. Due to the sheer speed of this platform, even a conventional warhead could act as a bunker-buster against hardened targets like command and control, secret facilities, etc.

About the timeline, @Martian2 would have a much better assessment than me.

But I am very much optimist about a speedy operationalization and delivery. Once the entire system is up and running, the HGV would offer a strong deterrent to secure China's key interests globally and ensure peace.

Indigenization of key technologies such as satellite imaging and tracking gives China an upper-hand in various defensive and offensive technologies that most other high military spenders lack.

This is a form and expression of true sovereignty.
 
Truer words have never been said. :enjoy:

If any world leaders decide to attack China, they'd better hold on to their shits, since we can kill them in their bunkers in 20-30 minutes from half a world away, with a conventionally armed HGV warhead. :partay:

Definitely so!

A smart philosopher, Machiavelli, once said, if you want to punish your enemy, punish them so ruthlessly that they would not have any urge or power to retaliate. A slightly wounded enemy may be more dangerous than a healthy one because the anger and pain would be factored in.

He also said, kill a man's father, he will forget in time. Take a man's property, that will not be forgotten in generations.

What agitated the US people was not necessarily the death of several hundred people on 9/11. It was the almost unrealistic destruction of property.

Hence, the HGV capability would serve both purposes in terms of offering the capability of precision strike with total destruction of key figures without having to causing much damage to property.

China holds an emancipatory international relations conceptualization, and historically, it has always been a reserved power with no intention to export ideas by force. These accumulated technological-military capabilities will enable China to uphold these ideas globally while ensuring safety and security to the people's of Greater China.
 
Hence, the HGV capability would serve both purposes in terms of offering the capability of precision strike with total destruction of key figures without having to causing much damage to property.

China holds an emancipatory international relations conceptualization, and historically, it has always been a reserved power with no intention to export ideas by force. These accumulated technological-military capabilities will enable China to uphold these ideas globally while ensuring safety and security to the people's of Greater China.

If the last military parade was anything to go by, we already have quite substantial numbers of operational DF-21D and DF-26. Since weapons platforms are only included in the parade if they are inducted and operational, and there were a lot of them there.

Scramjet technology can theoretically achieve up to Mach 20, though we'll probably not need to go beyond Mach 12 for the immediate future.

Now imagine the sheer kinetic power of something traveling that fast. Even if our adversaries build their bunkers deep below the surface (or secret weapons facilities, etc.) we'll still be able to destroy them with conventional warheads.

Enemy ships/carriers will have a much larger problem, since they can't hide underground. The HGV platform is super-maneuverable, and due to the speed, by the time they even detect it, they will have almost no window for evasive maneuvers. And of course, no missile defense system on Earth currently has the capability to intercept a Mach 10 gliding maneuverable warhead.

Every time the warhead maneuvers mid-flight, they will have to plot a different intercept path, and send another missile interceptor. That's even assuming that someone builds a missile defense system capable of tackling warheads at this speed. It will never be cost-effective for the defending side.

Of course it never was cost-effective for the defending side, as we learned during the Cold War, since ICBM's and countermeasures (decoys/etc.) are always much cheaper than Ballistic Missile Defense. But this is an even worse scenario, because every time the HGV maneuvers mid-flight, you have to recalculate everything again and send more interceptors, it's as if a new missile is generated every time it maneuvers.
 
Last edited:
If you check the past predictions, they thought China's GDP would only surpass Japan's by 2020, and they thought we would only be able to build a prototype of a 5th generation jet fighter by 2030. :rofl: And they were absolutely blindsided by DF-21D.

I love those predictions. :enjoy:

@TaiShang, @Edison Chen, @terranMarine, @Wolfwind, @Jlaw (I think I can only mention 5 before the system stops giving notifications), and others, what do you guys think?

When do you think we will be able to deploy operational HGV capability? Will we be the first in the world, like we were with ASBM (DF-21D and DF-26)?

Of course having global strike capability is only a part of the chain, but it is an important part. Due to the sheer speed of this platform, even a conventional warhead could act as a bunker-buster against hardened targets like command and control, secret weapons facilities, etc.
I never predict anything in the future because I'm not a fortune teller like great American scholars/journalists such as Gordon Chang, etc. One thing I do know is that some PDF non Chinese member will come in here and post comments such as "America did this 100 years ago", "China is only testing this, we are manufacturing this", "it's only in research state", " Do you have a domestic engine yet?", etc. :enjoy:
 
I never predict anything in the future because I'm not a fortune teller like great American scholars/journalists such as Gordon Chang, etc. One thing I do know is that some PDF non Chinese member will come in here and post comments such as "America did this 100 years ago", "China is only testing this, we are manufacturing this", "it's only in research state", " Do you have a domestic engine yet?", etc. :enjoy:

I think what counts is actual, operable results.

US is the most able competitor of China, no doubts. But China, too, has, some asymmetrical capabilities, and keeps building on them.
 
@Chinese-Dragon
It's always good for some laughter seeing Western predictions on the deployment of new technological Chinese military assets. Those so called analists often tend to believe China will take a much longer time to achieve operational status for our toys after images leaked or publicly revealed some of our capabilities. By then China has already done extensive research and secret testing. Therefore their calculations are most of the time off simply because they don't have a clue due to the way how Chinese do things. Underestimating China is also a traits these Westerners harbors in their personal character. That is why they didn't think China would surpass Japan economically so soon, the revelation of the J-20 and J-31 shocked the Americans and the world as lightning in clear day light. The DF-26 in the last parade was also a surprise wasn't it? Also that hybrid is totally convinced our railgun development is still in phase 1 but at the same time he has zero clue how long China has been working on it. Just look at the 8 prototypes China has of the J-20 since the world knows about it 3-4 years ago. During that time span those prototypes have adopted new technologies, improving the fighter many steps with each prototype. China is like army ants, we have sheer manpower working around the clock.

So far 6 HGV tests have been reported, it looks like China is really in high gear making sure this toy will be ready for operation within a couple of years if the next couple of tests are all successful. The author of the report estimates 2020-2025 is reasonably realistic in my opinion, everything depends on whether China adopts new changes to the HGV for the coming tests (which we will never know) and how they perform.
 

Back
Top Bottom