Modi has accepted making of 1971 of its own... so all Muslim killings can be credited in your account, without doubt.
Dafuq? Modi said that he did operation searchlight? Have you any idea what you are talking about?
The only "admission" (as if it was a secret) was that India raised and trained the Mukti Bahini. When have we ever denied this? We have always been proud of that, of raising trained battalions on foreign soil, right under the enemy's nose. After the objectives were achieved, and the enemy was cut into two, the Muktis were dismantled and demobilized. That's called resistance. Partisans. Read up the terms.
The mass murder of East Pakistani civilians was done by te Pak army, and General Tikka Khan is called the 'Butcher of Bangladesh". India raised and trained the Mukti Bahinis to free their land from the oppressive and murderous Pakistani state.
The genocide was by Pakistan. The training of freedom fighters was by India.
Oh stop this propaganda, as if India was not dying to offer their bases after 9/11.
Does / did India not have a base in Tajikistan? Bhutan? Muscat? Afghanistan? Mauritius?
Yes. But India does not host foreign bases.
And no, India was not "dying to" offer our bases to USA, or anybody else. Any government that does so, would be committing political hara-kiri.
There is no frigging way, that self respecting nations like India or Iran would host foreign bases. It is simply unthinkable for us. You may not understand that, being a country that begs foreigners to set up bases for some spare change. The almighty dollar is more important than self respect, and American aircrafts can even bomb your own people.
Can you please substantiate your ridiculous aspersion, that India was "dying to offer bases" to the USA post 9/11? Could you give me a few newspaper articles about India asking the US to setup bases, but being turned down? Or at least, just about India offering bases? What rubbish - you think everybody is like you?
Everything appears yellow to a jaundiced eye.
The biggest killer of muslims in islamic land is ISIS and Al-qaeda and who are their prime supporter.
Are you sure about that? Check out the number of muslims killed in Pakistan by Pakistanis in the last decade, I'm sure they can give ISIS and AQ a run for their money.
But yes, no other country's common people support such groups more than Pakistan's.
Kashmir minister's guard flees with two AK-47 rifles : North, News - India Today
Dozens of them flee and joined mujahideen and working undercover for freedom.
Our main objective was to ruin Maharaja and be informed there were ex british army officers and jawans involved in the liberation of Ajk and GB.
Answer me if Kashmir was a property of Maharaja then WTH Indian army is doing there.?
It wasn't the property of the ruler, it was the property of all Kashmiris. The rajah was the ruler. The Indian army only stepped in after the ruler of Kashmir legally and legitimately acceded to India, and begged us to stop the marauding Pashtun tribals and Pak army. We did that, and more - we even drove them back from important places like Srinagar.
Your real question should be, what were Pakistani Pakhtun lashkars doing in Kashmir when it was still and independent country? It was that invasion and the associated pillaging that compelled the ruler of Kashmir to accede to India and beg our support.
Correction: Attacked (not attacks). Update your info.
Sure. Now that they have installed a friendly govt there, they no longer need to attack Afghanistan. But they still do attack talibanis, who were Pakistan's best friends prior to 9/11.
baseless allegation. Bases were given after mutual understanding and written agreements. You can spin around regular Indian conspiracy theories but those are just conspiracy theories and nothing more. History (Pak-Iran) is a testament to that.
Mutual understanding and written agreements between Pakistan and USA, not involving Iran. And that too wasn't really an "agreement" between equals; GWB sternly said you are with them or against them, and Pak quickly capitulated.
Besides, you missed the point of the post. The point was that Iran hosting Indian warship for a port call is a far cry from Pakistan hosting American military bases for war. And yet, your countryman was chiding Iran for inviting your enemy for a port call, when you have hosted Iran's enemies for years, not just for port calls, but for full fledged and operational military bases.
That alledged base was vacated 3-4 years ago.
If it was only an "alleged" base, how was it vacated? Or was the vacating also an "allegation"?
One base (Shamsi AFB) was vacated after the US army massacred 24 Pakistani armymen. As long as they were killing only Pakistani civilians, they were welcome to stay. That says a lot about your lack of self respect.
. Qibla durust kar lo, warna yeh tumhay bhi L pay rakhay gay aik din 
