What's new

NATO has enough evidence of Russian aggression against Ukraine

Hindustani78

BANNED
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
40,471
Reaction score
-47
Country
India
Location
India
NATO has enough evidence of Russian aggression against Ukraine| Ukrinform

KYIV, July 2 /Ukrinform/. NATO and the European Union have enough evidence of Russian aggression against Ukraine.

Former Director of the NATO Information Office in Moscow Robert Pszczel said this during a Skype-conference within NATO-Ukraine Civic League Assembly in Kyiv on Thursday, an Ukrinform correspondent reports.

"NATO, the European Union and the European Parliament have absolutely enough evidence, we do not need new evidence of what Russia does," he said.

He has advised Ukraine use more information about Russian involvement in the conflict, which is publicly available in the Russian media and social networks, and use information that contradicts one another, in particular, information that was said by the Russian officials.
 
Good, Russia should invade Ukraine just like NATO invaded Afghanistan and Iraq.
 
Has Russia got some against NATO aggression against Afghanistan :what:
 
Who hasnt invaded Afghanistan or Iraq?



Point is, Americans should be the last people complaining about the foreign aggression in other countries.

They are not the 'Undisputed' champions of Human Rights like they claim to be ..
 
Russia's Donbas army swells to 80,000 as Moscow warns NATO - watch on - uatoday.tv
Jul. 4, 2015

Moscow threatens to use nuclear weapons to defend annexed Crimea

More than 50,000 Russian troops and over 30,000 militants are concentrated along the Ukrainian border and in eastern Ukraine, Ukrainian army officials claimed on Friday (July 03).

The announcement came days after a drone video was published online appearing to show a large Russian military camp deep inside Ukraine's Donbas region. The video shows T-72 tanks, scores of soldiers, construction equipment and tents, and shows that activity had increased in recent weeks.

NATO's chief Jens Stoltenberg said the US-led response, involving more exercises and an increased military presence on its eastern borders was not intended to spark a new arms race but was a much-needed reaction to Russia's military threat in eastern europe.

"First we decided to increase further the strength and capability of the NATO response force, including its air, maritime and special operations components. Altogether, the enhanced NATO response force will consist of up to 40,000 personnel. This represents a substantial increase from the previous level of 13,000."

Estonia's Defence Minister Sven Mikser has welcomed the decision to place US heavy armour in the baltics.

"We are not talking about entering into a new Cold War type of arms race, we are not trying collectively to match Putin, I mean, tank by tank or helicopter by helicopter in the Baltic sea region either. But the problem is that Putin sees himself as having two advantages: one of space, the other of time. Basically he believes that he can move things very quickly, he can do things very quickly because he...It's a very Putin-centric, autocratic system and he can take decisions and start implementing them immediately, and secondly because of the geographic proximity, he has quite significant assets immediately on the other side of the border."

Russia has described the US plan to station tanks and heavy weapons in NATO states near Russia's border the most aggressive US act since the Cold War and has hinted it would use nuclear weapons to defend Crimea, the Ukrainian territory Moscow seized in 2014.
 

Back
Top Bottom