What's new

Why do Pakistanis love Kashmir?

No brother, I see more denial in you. There is nothing wrong in being Christian Punjabi, look at your very own brother Yousuf Youhana who plays cricket. He converted after seeing the light and you can too. :)

My hisai brother you are banned but please next time don't be in denial. :D
 
Why do Pakistanis love Kashmir?

I am from Kashmir. There is certain thing that begs to differ concerning its love for Pakistan. For instance, preventing Mirpur from having its own Airport due to Islamabad Airport, and not eligible to host Pakistani cricket matches in Mirpur.

I remember the reaction from Pakistani members as they are swift in responding to why Mirpur should get to host Pakistani matches when it is not part of Pakistan -- the agenda of Punjab/Sindh.

That being said, Kashmiris are more loyal to Pakistan than Pakistanis itself. Funding from Bradford attests to that. :)

Are your mirpuri from UK? Islamabad airport is ideal for small town like mirpuri, plus technically Azad Kashmir is not part of Pakistan yet.
 
Are your mirpuri from UK? Islamabad airport is ideal for small town like mirpuri, plus technically Azad Kashmir is not part of Pakistan yet.

I was born in Pakistan, but my family blood-line traces back to Kashmir though. No, i am not from UK. I live in Canada.

Islamabad Airport is great deal, but there could have been Airport in Mirpur for the convenient of Kashmiris. Unfortunatley, they were denied due to competition with Islamabad Airport which is understandable though.

But Kashmir could use its own Airport. It is about time it has one of its own. :undecided:
 
Safeguarding of rights is not done on basis of some ID card which can be manipulated. You must have Law safeguarding the rights of subjects under the constitution. Instead of raising objections, i'd rather you had done some research before asking what India had done. India has done it's part, We have article 370, if you had read about it, You would have known how strict this law is. This law is still the reason why there is no migration from other parts into the Kashmir. This law is the only reason why those 2 bit separatist are still enjoying political monopoly.
Pakistan has implemented Autonomous Structure of Governance in AJK and GB despite of their Demands of becoming Fifth Province sio when I said about Kashmir Govt. that means AJK Govt. having their own PM which is more autonomy then what India is giving Kashmiris in the form of Article 370. Its not completely under Pakistan and their affairs towards Pakistan is controlled by their own appointed member to PM directly bypassing Parliament itself.

And don't be naive asking why anyone would want to settle in a tourism center. Your question itself answers you. Why wouldn't anyone want to settle in a place which is beautiful and can generate tourism and where Pakistani people don't have to think twice before leaving house if they wouldn't be blown up by some fanatic TTP extremist.
Kashmir Valley in Pakistan does support Tourism but economically not that prosper and the reason is because of Connection to rest of Pakistan as unlike Indian Kashmir which are more of plain Lands Valley Kashmir valley within Pakistan is right at the peak of Korakuram Mountain Range so connecting the region is way difficult and needs outside assistance. because its expensive so in this sense there are not many economic Opportunities there so therefore people doesnt wish to settle there in fact many of Natives use to come downwards to Potohar or Hazara Division from high lands because of Hostile Weather conditions.

Read some geography first. Do some research as to what exactly was princely state before '47 and whether Karakoram was a part or not? Karakoram was a part of J&K princely state, which you gifted to China. Hell, you got some nerves being stupid and claiming that it was inhabitant therefore unclaimed. So you're going to gift every inhabitant part of Pakistan to China?
The Parts that were given to China was inhabitable glaciers of Fewer Kilometers rather then settled Areas and there were Disputed but all the Population centers are still within Pakistan like Hunza its nothing like waste area of Aksai Chin region with very small Population of LOAC that India handed over to China. Just go and look at the Map again because India had given China Much bigger land then few KM of Pakistan Uninhabited Glaciers before making your point.

The Kashmiri stance is clear according to voting % in this election. More than 70% people voted in this election. It is a clear indicator of their believe. Hell, it is even more than most populous states in India.
The Mandate of Kashmir was only due to BJP Govt. trying to Scrape Article 370. It was Kashmiris Showing their Reaction against BJP to stay out of Kashmir and Article 370 that is why even those Huriyyat Members doesnt APPEAL people to Boycott The elections. So there is a difference between Reaction and Actual Mandate if you Indians are so CONFIDENT about Kashmiri then why dont you allow International Media and let them take people's opinions we would see how much Kashmiris Love India and how much they Hate India.

Which UN resolution are you crying about? The same one which Pakistan did not follow yet, that one? This is great, Pakistani government always cries on every world forum about this resolution but never told anybody why it never followed it. Yes, Jammu & Kashmir was a disputed territory to us, But not anymore. Since Pakistan failed to comply with the requirements of UN resolution, India in the '90s passed a resolution in Parliament and made it clear that J&K is an integral part of India and non-negotiable. And Law passed by Indian parliament is above any UN resolution now. It even supersedes Shimla agreement which made it abundantly clear that any dispute should be resolved bilaterlay, which also your government does not follow
Pakistan is willing to follow it would India Guarantee that they would follow their side of decision????India has 300,000+ troops stationed there 3 times more then Pakistani Troops in Kashmir. Pakistan did Negotiated with India back in 2003 but Indian scrape the whole thing afterwards if you think this is how Pakistan should Obliged and India is out of any Commitments then sorry it doesnt work this way. India has to Obliged by the Rule along with Pakistan at the same time there is no such thing Mentioned where First Pakistan and then India. It was India who Scrapped Negotiation on Kashmir back in 2003 not Pakistan so first look at your Own country's position how much they are Serious on Implementing the UN Resolution before asking for Commitment from Pakistan.


Speaking of failures, Pakistan is a supreme example. India otoh is in excellent raltions with neighbor. BD govt for instance is pro India. We just changed SL govt suitable to us. While Pakistan is having bad relations even with Iran.
BD government is Indian Sponsored Of Course but BD people dont have very high opinion of there Govt. rather BD is going through Political Crisis of its own and Pakistan isnt taking any Interest in BD that is the reason for your Success as you have open Playing Field there but in Srilanka you can only Hope for that because their Opposition and Establishment is still on Pakistan/Chinese Side that is why Humbantuta Port project is still going according to plan and only their PM can offer right now is LIP SERVICE instead of REAL LEVERAGE because he has his hands full within its own Establishment.

Isolated incidents does not prove general perception. And talk to me about Azad Kashmir when Azad Kashmir actually has a government, not a puppet government of Islamabad. Azad Kashmir is ruled from Islamabad. They have installed puppet government there. India otoh just completed free and fair elections and yesterday provided an independent government to J&K to prosper with whole of India.
That Puppet Govt. is also ELECTED GOVT. Govt. there and their are no such Track record of Electoral Rigging as India had in 1988 so it has more credibility then Indian Kashmiri Govt. which had track record of rigging Elections in the past.
 
Pakistan has implemented Autonomous Structure of Governance in AJK and GB despite of their Demands of becoming Fifth Province sio when I said about Kashmir Govt. that means AJK Govt. having their own PM which is more autonomy then what India is giving Kashmiris in the form of Article 370. Its not completely under Pakistan and their affairs towards Pakistan is controlled by their own appointed member to PM directly bypassing Parliament itself.

Dude, Let me tell you how free the government of so called AJK is.
The Azad Jammu and Kashmir Council is a supreme body consisting of 11 members, six from the government of Azad Jammu and Kashmir and five from the government of Pakistan. Its chairman/chief executive is the president of Pakistan. Other members of the council are the president and the prime minister of Azad Kashmir. You see that, out of 11 members, 5 are Pakistani and 1 is Pakistan's president. As far as others are concerned, only those people are allowed to contest in election there who are pro-Pakistani. election candidates are pre screened to ensure that only those who support Kashmir?s union with Pakistan can contest elections. Anyone who wants to take part in public life in Azad Kashmir has to sign a pledge of loyalty to Pakistan, while anyone who publicly supports or peacefully works for an independent Kashmir faces persecution. There is a façade of an elected local government, but the federal government in Islamabad, the army and the intelligence agencies control all aspects of political life in Azad Kashmir.The military shows no tolerance for dissent and practically runs the region as a fiefdom. See how free the govt in Azad Kashmir is?

Kashmir Valley in Pakistan does support Tourism but economically not that prosper and the reason is because of Connection to rest of Pakistan as unlike Indian Kashmir which are more of plain Lands Valley Kashmir valley within Pakistan is right at the peak of Korakuram Mountain Range so connecting the region is way difficult and needs outside assistance. because its expensive so in this sense there are not many economic Opportunities there so therefore people doesnt wish to settle there in fact many of Natives use to come downwards to Potohar or Hazara Division from high lands because of Hostile Weather conditions.

That is just lame BS claim.

The Parts that were given to China was inhabitable glaciers of Fewer Kilometers rather then settled Areas and there were Disputed but all the Population centers are still within Pakistan like Hunza its nothing like waste area of Aksai Chin region with very small Population of LOAC that India handed over to China. Just go and look at the Map again because India had given China Much bigger land then few KM of Pakistan Uninhabited Glaciers before making your point.

India did not give any part to China. Aksai China was part that India lost in war. Stop being a moron. See the difference? India lost the part and Pakistan gift wrapped it to China. There is a difference there.

The Mandate of Kashmir was only due to BJP Govt. trying to Scrape Article 370. It was Kashmiris Showing their Reaction against BJP to stay out of Kashmir and Article 370 that is why even those Huriyyat Members doesnt APPEAL people to Boycott The elections. So there is a difference between Reaction and Actual Mandate if you Indians are so CONFIDENT about Kashmiri then why dont you allow International Media and let them take people's opinions we would see how much Kashmiris Love India and how much they Hate India.

Whatever the reason was, people did vote. That shows their faith in democracy. And people voted for democracy for various parties. And people do not do negative voting in India unlike Pakistan. If your claim was true, BJP would not be in government today. :D

Pakistan is willing to follow it would India Guarantee that they would follow their side of decision????India has 300,000+ troops stationed there 3 times more then Pakistani Troops in Kashmir. Pakistan did Negotiated with India back in 2003 but Indian scrape the whole thing afterwards if you think this is how Pakistan should Obliged and India is out of any Commitments then sorry it doesnt work this way. India has to Obliged by the Rule along with Pakistan at the same time there is no such thing Mentioned where First Pakistan and then India. It was India who Scrapped Negotiation on Kashmir back in 2003 not Pakistan so first look at your Own country's position how much they are Serious on Implementing the UN Resolution before asking for Commitment from Pakistan.

The bold part shows your lack of knowledge. Go and read that UN resolution first. It explicitly says that Pakistan had to withdraw it's regular and irregular forces first. That was the first pre-requisite of Plebiscite. Do you want me to quote whole resolution?

READ THE RESOLUTION BEFORE COMMENTING and being proven an idiot.

BD government is Indian Sponsored Of Course but BD people dont have very high opinion of there Govt. rather BD is going through Political Crisis of its own and Pakistan isnt taking any Interest in BD that is the reason for your Success as you have open Playing Field there but in Srilanka you can only Hope for that because their Opposition and Establishment is still on Pakistan/Chinese Side that is why Humbantuta Port project is still going according to plan and only their PM can offer right now is LIP SERVICE instead of REAL LEVERAGE because he has his hands full within its own Establishment.

Lol, your bTThurt proves me right. SL govt and BD govt are pro-Indian. And you have to digest this even if you do not like that.

That Puppet Govt. is also ELECTED GOVT. Govt. there and their are no such Track record of Electoral Rigging as India had in 1988 so it has more credibility then Indian Kashmiri Govt. which had track record of rigging Elections in the past.

Read above.
 
Dude, Let me tell you how free the government of so called AJK is.
The Azad Jammu and Kashmir Council is a supreme body consisting of 11 members, six from the government of Azad Jammu and Kashmir and five from the government of Pakistan. Its chairman/chief executive is the president of Pakistan. Other members of the council are the president and the prime minister of Azad Kashmir. You see that, out of 11 members, 5 are Pakistani and 1 is Pakistan's president. As far as others are concerned, only those people are allowed to contest in election there who are pro-Pakistani. election candidates are pre screened to ensure that only those who support Kashmir?s union with Pakistan can contest elections. Anyone who wants to take part in public life in Azad Kashmir has to sign a pledge of loyalty to Pakistan, while anyone who publicly supports or peacefully works for an independent Kashmir faces persecution. There is a façade of an elected local government, but the federal government in Islamabad, the army and the intelligence agencies control all aspects of political life in Azad Kashmir.The military shows no tolerance for dissent and practically runs the region as a fiefdom. See how free the govt in Azad Kashmir is?
B.S. Azad Kashmir Counsel just Handles Financial Matters and Tax Reforms instead of Governance of AJK. Their Responsibility is same as Pakistan Central Board of Revenue in rest of Pakistan as Kashmir is dependent on Pakistan for its Financial Resources because it doesnt have much Economy. For Legislation Matters Azad Kashmir has its Own Assembly which has 41 Elected Members and 8 Cooped Members and it has its own President, PM and Chief Justice as well.

Whatever the reason was, people did vote. That shows their faith in democracy. And people voted for democracy for various parties. And people do not do negative voting in India unlike Pakistan. If your claim was true, BJP would not be in government today. :D
Their Faith in Democracy doesnt equals that they abandon their Demands of Right of self determination. That show that their message to Indian Central Govt. to stay out of Kashmir issues and as for their Collision Govt. then you should follow your own media as this was part of the compromise that BJP wont touch Article 370 in return for non Muslims of Jammu representation in the Kashmir Assembly. CM Sayeed's showing of Gratitude to Hurriyat also confirms that Hurriyat also didnt erge Kashmiris to Boycott the polling otherwise Results would be Different.

Lol, your bTThurt proves me right. SL govt and BD govt are pro-Indian. And you have to digest this even if you do not like that.
SL is a temporary setback and it can come back because Sinhalese are on our side as they look India with Suspicion due to Indian role on Decades of conflict with LTTE so this Govt. of Narrow Margin victory cant set the new Course instead its Opposition and Establishment in Srilanka which would be deciding factor in Major decisions. Bangladesh has no significant Strategic Value in regional Geopolitics so India can play as they wish if their Strategic Value become Significant then they would be scraped from Indian Interest as well.
 
B.S. Azad Kashmir Counsel just Handles Financial Matters and Tax Reforms instead of Governance of AJK. Their Responsibility is same as Pakistan Central Board of Revenue in rest of Pakistan as Kashmir is dependent on Pakistan for its Financial Resources because it doesnt have much Economy. For Legislation Matters Azad Kashmir has its Own Assembly which has 41 Elected Members and 8 Cooped Members and it has its own President, PM and Chief Justice as well.

Their Faith in Democracy doesnt equals that they abandon their Demands of Right of self determination. That show that their message to Indian Central Govt. to stay out of Kashmir issues and as for their Collision Govt. then you should follow your own media as this was part of the compromise that BJP wont touch Article 370 in return for non Muslims of Jammu representation in the Kashmir Assembly. CM Sayeed's showing of Gratitude to Hurriyat also confirms that Hurriyat also didnt erge Kashmiris to Boycott the polling otherwise Results would be Different.

SL is a temporary setback and it can come back because Sinhalese are on our side as they look India with Suspicion due to Indian role on Decades of conflict with LTTE so this Govt. of Narrow Margin victory cant set the new Course instead its Opposition and Establishment in Srilanka which would be deciding factor in Major decisions. Bangladesh has no significant Strategic Value in regional Geopolitics so India can play as they wish if their Strategic Value become Significant then they would be scraped from Indian Interest as well.
--
Dear with all due respect for your view ...
can pakistan first condut free and fair election for itself.. atleast.
you guys making your life misreable and our life bit diffult due to kashmir ..
better concentrate on on real prioriites of job, poverty, goeth , food , health educ than kashmir
we are working on same despite huge issue ... we did not make and will not make kashmir jugalr vein
rest you can debate 200 pages as both side are in mud for one point or other..
--
instead spenind on terroristspen on AJK show inida you made real paradise by your action ..
it simpel and best ans to india if you consider us as occupation force ..
--
we are giving time enegry life of men for kashmir on terrorism separitsm more and less in development but still we are wokong on railwy line job edu there with slow pace ..
--
i can argue and you can argue its endless
crux is ..JK wil reamin in india .. and AJK in pak... LOC will reamin LOC or become IB that it ..
terrorist as state policy days is over.. it might come but looks rare ... so better change with time or time change you
 
--
Dear with all due respect for your view ...
can pakistan first condut free and fair election for itself.. atleast.
you guys making your life misreable and our life bit diffult due to kashmir ..
better concentrate on on real prioriites of job, poverty, goeth , food , health educ than kashmir
we are working on same despite huge issue ... we did not make and will not make kashmir jugalr vein
rest you can debate 200 pages as both side are in mud for one point or other..
Pakistani Democracy is new so you can expect Political Crisis here as well as Rigging Allegations from Opponents or those who lose.
Kashmir issue is hand in with all issues with India so whatever happens between India and Pakistan this issue would be part of the problem as this issue is not just related to Territory or Demographics anymore but it deals with greater Problems then that.
Pakistan is witnessing a crisis of Multidimensional level jut like 30 years old Cold war era at the gates of Pakistan so for that it would take time but Pakistan have positive Prospect to control its situation because Pakistan has Experience them in the Past and also able to control them.
What India is doing on its Economy is nothing of a big deal as any country with Indian Situation would do the same but Pakistan is not in the same situation as Pakistan neighborhood is filled with Rough and out of control States like Iran and Afghanistan along with India whom we have Territorial Disputes with so dont expect Pakistan is living in the same situation as India which is surrounded by Tiny States around it easily Controllable.
If you find my replies irrelevant then why even bother to Respond them?You can always ignore them if you want.
nstead spenind on terroristspen on AJK show inida you made real paradise by your action ..
it simpel and best ans to india if you consider us as occupation force ..
--
we are giving time enegry life of men for kashmir on terrorism separitsm more and less in development but still we are wokong on railwy line job edu there with slow pace ..
--
i can argue and you can argue its endless
crux is ..JK wil reamin in india .. and AJK in pak... LOC will reamin LOC or become IB that it ..
terrorist as state policy days is over.. it might come but looks rare ... so better change with time or time change you
Pakistan was much better then India from 1950s to 1990s when Pakistan GDP per Capita remain higher then India throughout Mentioned Decades but situation started getting worse when Conflicts began to Arrive at our Door Steps along with Uninvited Guests in the form of Refugees so what Pakistan has suffered is a form of Fallout in the Neighborhood while Indian Neighborhood wasnt that Dangerous so dont think India has done some wonders in comparison to Pakistan instead India got the roam to concentrate while we didnt. Pakistan can take over India if we have same Situation as India has in the neighborhood instead of Crisis and its Spill over to Pakistan.
Whatever and Whenever the fate of Kashmiris could be decided its better to have them included in it rather then Deciding in by Pakistan and India so Kashmiri's opinion matters here not India or Pakistan Opinion that is the concluding side of every Argument and Counter Argument.
 
Pakistani Democracy is new so you can expect Political Crisis here as well as Rigging Allegations from Opponents or those who lose.
Kashmir issue is hand in with all issues with India so whatever happens between India and Pakistan this issue would be part of the problem as this issue is not just related to Territory or Demographics anymore but it deals with greater Problems then that.
Pakistan is witnessing a crisis of Multidimensional level jut like 30 years old Cold war era at the gates of Pakistan so for that it would take time but Pakistan have positive Prospect to control its situation because Pakistan has Experience them in the Past and also able to control them.
What India is doing on its Economy is nothing of a big deal as any country with Indian Situation would do the same but Pakistan is not in the same situation as Pakistan neighborhood is filled with Rough and out of control States like Iran and Afghanistan along with India whom we have Territorial Disputes with so dont expect Pakistan is living in the same situation as India which is surrounded by Tiny States around it easily Controllable.
If you find my replies irrelevant then why even bother to Respond them?You can always ignore them if you want.
Pakistan was much better then India from 1950s to 1990s when Pakistan GDP per Capita remain higher then India throughout Mentioned Decades but situation started getting worse when Conflicts began to Arrive at our Door Steps along with Uninvited Guests in the form of Refugees so what Pakistan has suffered is a form of Fallout in the Neighborhood while Indian Neighborhood wasnt that Dangerous so dont think India has done some wonders in comparison to Pakistan instead India got the roam to concentrate while we didnt. Pakistan can take over India if we have same Situation as India has in the neighborhood instead of Crisis and its Spill over to Pakistan.
Whatever and Whenever the fate of Kashmiris could be decided its better to have them included in it rather then Deciding in by Pakistan and India so Kashmiri's opinion matters here not India or Pakistan Opinion that is the concluding side of every Argument and Counter Argument.
--
Dear .
what i said is simple..
concetrate each other own hosue first ..
both hosue not in order .. both have sitiatuion which cant be so proud of ..
being indian i can boast about science , tehc , ecnonomy but same time i have hungry people, radicalisam , floods , unemployment to name ..
you have your own issue .
speding 32 pasge or 320 pages will give only argument vs counter argument..
Pak was alwys did good in dictatorship but less in democratic setup.. it proven with data thred in pdf too
as democracy need time negry system pepple matuntedness which come in decades ..
what i said and saying is ..
Pak used USA due to afg .. usssr war .. cold war.. troublin india for kashmir via terrorist .. fredom gihter . mujahid ...
USA was aware in 90s too. but then open eyes in 9/11
suddenly they relasieed they are wrong side .. so change that ...
now
India now due to economy and other gains with USA or both tghter liek u in 90s .. but we use that for development .. trade, scicne ,,, system ..
that diffrence ..
kashmir was simple sukodo made puzzel due to pak policy .. so now no one listen to pak... not even your brotherly nation .. on world forum
bilalterly they say many things.. in world forum how many ?
we can still spend our resoure on kashmir as we are growing economially ,, socialy , politiclay , systme wise too
but for pak whcih alredy on aid .. resource crunch ... with economy socialt and politicla setup its difficult
 
Please also Consider Context because back in 1948 their was no Such thing called UN PEACE KEEPING FORCE so that is why India was asked to keep their Forces to its Minimum to keep the order. Since now Peacekeeping Force is already Available so Its Peace Keeping force that is allowed there instead of Pakistani or Indian Forces.

Pakistan doesnt even have enough force in Kashmir its India which has Stationed 300,000 Troops in Kashmir and Airbases there so Pakistan can Take their Troops back if India is ready to take their Troops back to its Minimum according to Population where they are no Threat to Peace(20,000 to 30,000) and it applies to both sides together not just India or Pakistan.


let Pakistan remove it's army completely, and then depending on insurgency level India will surely withdraw to level needed to keep the insurgency in check.. but first things always have to be first..

U.N.peacekeeping force will be used to cater to U.N.observers for free and fair referendum, nothing else..

talking about the truest context, would Pakistan ever be able to convince China to let go of aksai-chin, which is part of Kashmir, and no referendum is possible without it..

remove your army completely and talk to China please first before dragging India into it..
 
let Pakistan remove it's army completely, and then depending on insurgency level India will surely withdraw to level needed to keep the insurgency in check.. but first things always have to be first..

U.N.peacekeeping force will be used to cater to U.N.observers for free and fair referendum, nothing else..

talking about the truest context, would Pakistan ever be able to convince China to let go of aksai-chin, which is part of Kashmir, and no referendum is possible without it..

remove your army completely and talk to China please first before dragging India into it..
There is no need to have both Pakistan or Indian Army anymore because UN peace keeping force is available in this regards which wasnt the case in 1948 Their isnt any need of having Pakistani or Indian Troops there anymore because they are Party to the Conflict and we have Neutral Mechanism Available to us.

Existence of Aksai Chin is Irrelevant because it doesnt have enough Population to Influence the turnout due to very low Population and using Aksai Chin for Argument would be nothing but Excuse to Sabotage this Process all together. It wont be even in Indian Interest because for getting Aksai Chin we need to get Chinese Involve in the Conflict Resolution as well and I dont think India would Agree to it because India wants to keep it Bilateral.
 
There is no need to have both Pakistan or Indian Army anymore because UN peace keeping force is available in this regards which wasnt the case in 1948 Their isnt any need of having Pakistani or Indian Troops there anymore because they are Party to the Conflict and we have Neutral Mechanism Available to us.

Existence of Aksai Chin is Irrelevant because it doesnt have enough Population to Influence the turnout due to very low Population and using Aksai Chin for Argument would be nothing but Excuse to Sabotage this Process all together. It wont be even in Indian Interest because for getting Aksai Chin we need to get Chinese Involve in the Conflict Resolution as well and I dont think India would Agree to it because India wants to keep it Bilateral.

the argument of kashmir has always been geographical rather than population centric.. if you choose the population centric argument, then AJK, GB and Kashmir valley will decidedly vote for independence from both India and Pakistan, and Jammu and ladakh districts will vote to join India, and aksai-chin is an extension of ladakh, so it has to be given to India.. and realistically if and when, and that's a big if, Kashmir issue is sorted out, there is no way that Pakistan can ever get Jammu and ladakh districts of kashmir, as they don't have Muslim majority population, and it'll be most likely it loses control of AJK and GB as well..

Pakistan doesn't want any referendum because of this reason only, as they have a lot more to lose than any other party to the dispute, whether India or China, that's why it'll never comply with the first step of removing is armed forces, and that's why there will never be any referendum in Kashmir..
 
Pakistan already has a fair skinned brave Muslim community: the Pashtun. It doesn't want Kashmir for the fair skin reason. The author is an idiot.
 
image.jpeg
Oh my god. This broke my my heart into million pieces :cry::cry::cry::cry::cry:
image.jpeg

:frown::frown::frown::frown:

@Zibago @Shamain @django [USER=158857]@jamahir

this tweets are after an incident recently took place in Kashmir. Where a girl was sexually harassed by an Indian solider (I have to be clear) and people protested, a chaos happened and two boys lost their lives. :([/USER]
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom