Xiaomi shows Arunachal is in India at handset launch, triggers anger in China

SarthakGanguly said:

Yes, unfortunate though it may sound - this is true. I hope the people of Tibet get their emancipation some day. But even the Han invasion is not relevant to this thread.

Click to expand...

SarthakGanguly said:

Let's talk about how Xiaomi, PRC's number one mobile brand has decided to bet on India instead of PRC. Perhaps they have ears to the wall and have got wind of the dangers of a failing economy in the Chinese subcontinent.

Click to expand...

Shotgunner51 said:

You lack of knowledge is astounding, Xiaomi is not PRC's state-run brand, it is privately owned, shareholders diverse across a few nations incl China Russia, US, Singapore.

Yeah maybe they have ears to the wall, who knows right? BTW by your logic, what would you say about Carrefour's and Walmart's pullout of india?

Click to expand...

SarthakGanguly said:

No, you are mistaken. I mean Xiaomi is PRC's numero uno brand of choice - as they claim, I admit. I am well aware of the fact that they are privately owned.

Click to expand...

Shotgunner51 said:

You were indeed unaware of this fact right? If that's the case I told you that's your lack of basic knowledge, which is fine, but if your argument is made base on false assumptions, then you invites an embarrassing insult on your very own intelligence.

Click to expand...

SarthakGanguly said:

Oh come on. Pls, its common sense. They mention Pvt Ltd very clearly. Besides, their showing Arunachal would have been a catastrophe. That is not the point.
My question is since they are the numero uno brand now in China, why are they dissing them off? Economically it makes no sense. Or does it?

Click to expand...

Shotgunner51 said:

Pvt Ltd is just possible legal entity inside the whole legal structure of any enterprise, nothing says about nationality, what school did you go to?
What are the numero uno brand in india, say PC, say TV? indian common sense suggest they are indian owned?
For business decision of a private-owned company, I can't answer.
How do you explain Carrefour's and Walmart's pullout of india?

Click to expand...

SarthakGanguly said:

What made you deduce that by Pvt Ltd I meant it states nationality? I am not getting you. Perhaps there is an acute IQ mismatch (mine is lower of course).

Click to expand...

SarthakGanguly said:

Let's talk about how Xiaomi, PRC's number one mobile brand has decided to bet on India instead of PRC

Click to expand...

SarthakGanguly said:

No, you are mistaken. I mean Xiaomi is PRC's numero uno brand of choice - as they claim, I admit. I am well aware of the fact that they are privately owned.

Click to expand...

SarthakGanguly said:

Oh come on. Pls, its common sense. They mention Pvt Ltd very clearly

Click to expand...

Shotgunner51 said:

Is it your lack of knowledge or simply denial of fact? Labeling "backstabbing" in hind sight doesn't change the result of india's humiliating defeat.
India needs to revisit 1962 humiliation for catharsis - The Times of India
Sino-Indian War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

We han people live thousands of kilos away, took Tibet (which india wish to be a buffer state) in 1951, humiliated india in 1962, forced the line to LAC (Line of Actual Control) to within hundred of kilos to new delhi, gain de facto control of AC, and now claim an extra 90,000 sqm of prime and beautiful indian soil, that's how to humiliate india in a continuous fashion.

Click to expand...

DRAY said:

PRC's paper tiger army was humiliated like dirt by every nation, even with a 25:1 troop advantage and backstabber's advantage they did not have balls to hold on to the territory and ran away tucking their tails between their legs.

Click to expand...

DRAY said:

We still own and continue to own 90,000 sq.km. of prime and beautiful land claimed by PRC and you can't do a jack about it, And we didn't have any post in Akshay Hind because that was a barren land, you didn't win anything, you just stole it when we were not there. And then in 1967 we took Sikkim by massacring the Chinese paper tigers, NOW THAT'S REAL HUMILIATION.

Click to expand...

Shotgunner51 said:

Labeling "backstabbing" to cover your incapability? Renaming ceasefire as "ran away"? Faking up "25:1" to save face? All your lack of knowledge or simply denial of fact? Doesn't change the result of india's humiliating defeat.

India needs to revisit 1962 humiliation for catharsis - The Times of India
Sino-Indian War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Keep labeling "paper tigers" cos that's what you can only boast about, while we han people live thousands of kilos away, since your British masters left we took Tibet (which india wish to be a buffer state) in 1951, humiliated india in 1962 by a decisive victory, forced the line to LAC (Line of Actual Control, tranverses 4 indian states jammu/kashimiri, uttarakhand, himachal, sikkim) to within hundred of kilos to new delhi, gain de facto control of AC (you can try take it back), and we now claim an extra 90,000 sqm of prime and beautiful indian soil to keep up the tension, that's how to humiliate india in a continuous fashion

Click to expand...