Arunachal Pradesh disputed area; India should do more to maintain peace: China
- Thread starter INDIAPOSITIVE
- Start date
Prometheus
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2010
- Messages
- 4,942
- Reaction score
- -7
- Country
- Location
ok theek hai
mujhaidind
BANNED
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2014
- Messages
- 2,079
- Reaction score
- -28
- Country
- Location
Yea these North-eastern people feel more closer to mongloids and westerners.
pher
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2014
- Messages
- 889
- Reaction score
- -12
- Country
- Location
you are damn right it is not 1962, at that time we had roughly the same GDP with india, now we are 5 times more than it. also we didn't have access to the border then but now we have the world-class infrastructure in that area. Do the equation yourself. be careful not to bring your new god modi here, we don't buy him.
OrionHunter
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 28, 2011
- Messages
- 13,818
- Reaction score
- -5
- Country
- Location
Then WTF is China doing in Pak Occupied Kashmir which is considered a disputed area? They have 11,000 PLA and civilians busy developing infrastructure there to link up with Gwadar.
What's sauce for the goose should be sauce for the gander, right?
Really? High time India starts claiming Tibet as part of North India! And Xinjiang as an independent state.
Kinetic
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2010
- Messages
- 11,200
- Reaction score
- -33
ChennaiDude
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2011
- Messages
- 2,588
- Reaction score
- -5
- Country
- Location
You really think a full fledged war between India and China is a possibility?...If you are so strong as compared to India now....whats stopping you...who loses more if there is a war?...Equation done.
Really??
You have no idea what you are dealing with.
This tractor offensive in PDF not gonna change the reality that CCP would think twice before such an adventure.
axisofevil
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 10, 2009
- Messages
- 3,953
- Reaction score
- -14
UK recognises China's direct rule over Tibet - Telegraph
The British playing their usualy BS games.
A localized war aimed at obtaining certain objectives is quite possible. On top of that, the whole notion of full fledged war is outdated nowadays. Non state actors are used to weaken and exploit loopholes in defence. Economics is used to become richer and gain concessions. Media perception is huge in this day and age, China and the world is using it correctly. India doesn't. When this has reached a critical level, then full war may be used to directly challenge other nations deemed stronger.
That or unless you go for a first strike, full nuclear attack taking out your opponent's capabilities. We are forgetting the most important factor which is tech which allows for plans and strategies to change overnight.
The British playing their usualy BS games.
A localized war aimed at obtaining certain objectives is quite possible. On top of that, the whole notion of full fledged war is outdated nowadays. Non state actors are used to weaken and exploit loopholes in defence. Economics is used to become richer and gain concessions. Media perception is huge in this day and age, China and the world is using it correctly. India doesn't. When this has reached a critical level, then full war may be used to directly challenge other nations deemed stronger.
That or unless you go for a first strike, full nuclear attack taking out your opponent's capabilities. We are forgetting the most important factor which is tech which allows for plans and strategies to change overnight.
Last edited:
All garbage. China will claim everything is disputed. A chinese general even laid claim to part of the artic. AP is as disputed as Hong Kong or Macau is.
No moron, do the equation ur self. If China is powerfull, why the roads to nowhere?
FACT: India is closer to the border to Tibet, Lhasa is closer to Dehli than Beijing to Lhasa! Interesting...
India has a lot more airfields near the border compared to China.
1987 China managed to deploy 8 divisions to NEFA...in contrast with out trying India deployment 10 Divisions, with heavy arty...
you do the math. If China believes NE india is its...why did China pull out in 1962? and then in 1987 allow India to have Arunchal Pradesh (South Tibet) join Indian parliament?
Fact is that India holds the geographicall advantage. Tibet is China's too loose, not Indias.
You can not deploy your full force to Tibet, thats why the Indian army is more effective exclude 1962 if you do more reading.
Only option avlaiable to China is to support Pakistan to open another front. At most China can only stretch out 100 thousand PLA accross this barren land. India, double that.
Old Commie philosophy of 'What is mine is mine, what is yours is disputed' or as someone said a few years back, 'Wherever a Han sat, shat or spat in the past 2,000 years has suddenly become an inalienable part of China'. Always good for a laugh.
Similar threads
