DRDO's New Multi-caliber weapon system to replace INSAS

Zarvan · Oct 4, 2014

kaykay said:
Well It will be good if you Pakistanis will learn to comprehend something first before preaching someone else.
India is gonna replace both AKs and INSAS because they both have their limitations. AKs are with COINs forces while INSAS is a standard rifle for infantry. Multi caliber guns will solve this problem of using 2 types of guns for different roles as just by changing calibers, one can use it in different roles.
And also being in service with 40 countries have nothing to do with modernisation. Those who can't afford to modernise its army will have no option but to use basic AKs as they are cheapest.

Many countries who can afford still use AK

A1Kaid · Oct 7, 2014

DingDong said:
INSAS took thousands of Pakistani lives during 1999 war. Our fighter jets and tanks have served us well.

INSAS took thousands of Pakistani lives during 1999 war

Fool there weren't even thousands of Pakistanis present in Kargil. G3 has taken thousands of Indian lives as well over the years.

karan.1970 · Oct 7, 2014

A1Kaid said:
Fool there weren't even thousands of Pakistanis present in Kargil. G3 has taken thousands of Indian lives as well over the years.

By the admission of your Prime Minister (present and at the time of Kargil), close to four thousand Pakistani infiltrators were neutralized in Kargil War. But you are right. Most of them were blown to bits by the Bofors or Mirage attacks and not INSAS

GORKHALI · Oct 7, 2014

A1Kaid said:
Fool there weren't even thousands of Pakistanis present in Kargil. G3 has taken thousands of Indian lives as well over the years.

Actually to be precise its more than 4000 soldiers according to your PM.
The Hindu : Over 4,000 soldiers killed in Kargil: Sharif

A1Kaid · Oct 7, 2014

karan.1970 said:
By the admission of your Prime Minister (present and at the time of Kargil), close to four thousand Pakistani infiltrators were neutralized in Kargil War. But you are right. Most of them were blown to bits by the Bofors or Mirage attacks and not INSAS

Most of Kargil high points are still under Pakistani control to this today. Indians were slaughtered in the hundreds, you Indians have lied about your battle records in Kargil per se your own military commanders in Kargil. Using inflated enemy casualty numbers, false encounters, etc.

A1Kaid · Oct 7, 2014

GORKHALI said:
Actually to be precise its more than 4000 soldiers according to your PM.
The Hindu : Over 4,000 soldiers killed in Kargil: Sharif

Read the article and try to understand his motive behind in saying this, it certainly isn't the truth.

In recent times, Mr. Sharif has been harping on Kargil as an example of failure of the military leadership of Gen. Musharraf.

Mr. Sharif, in exile in Saudi Arabia under a pact with the Musharraf regime, in a first ever on record interview some weeks back had threatened to "reveal all" about the "Kargil misadventure".

The Hindu : Over 4,000 soldiers killed in Kargil: Sharif

Pak lost 2,700 men in Kargil war: Sharif

Pak lost 2,700 men in Kargil war: Sharif - The Times of India

Here Nawaz Sharif said the casualty was 2,700 for PA, he has been totally inconsistent about the data. It's really about to make Gen. Musharraf look bad for the operation. I can assure you if Pakistan were to even lose nearly 4k soldiers in Kargil it wouldn't have been a skirmish no longer. Kargil operation was mix of Kashmiri and Pakistani troops mostly Kashmiri according to Gen. Musharraf in his memoir Line of Fire.

But let's look at two sources here:

If I remember correctly Gen. Musharraf put the number at est. 270, US State Department provided an independent estimate and put the Pakistani it at est. 700. Only person claiming 4k casualty is Mr. Nawaz Sharif and that is purely for political reasons.

According to Wiki:

Pakistan confirmed that 453 soldiers were killed. The US Department of State had made an early, partial estimate of close to 700 fatalities.

Kargil War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

But let's focus on Indian casualties in Kargil.

‘Pakistan lost 270 soldiers, India 1600 troopers’
Referring to Pakistani casualties during the Kargil war, Musharraf said that Pakistan lost only 270 men against India’s 1,600 soldiers.

Kargil operation was big success, Pakistan lost because of Sharif: Musharraf

A feature given on the PIB web site on "Operation Vijay" clearly says that 527 brave soldiers and airmen laid down their lives during the Kargil war.

Disclosing Kargil casualties would affect morale of troops: CIC

If you look at either sources and compare the numbers on most accounts Pakistan suffered less casualties than India. According to Gen. Musharraf who is one of the leading public authority on Kargil war and the man who would actually have better figures and estimates Pakistan lost est. 270 soldiers and India 1,600 troops. Besides, it would have been probably impossible for Pakistan to even send 4,000 soldiers into Kargil without earlier detection, a much smaller and leaner force was sent to carry out the successful operation.Kargil is mostly controlled by Pakistan to this day.

Rahul1563 · Oct 7, 2014

Ya son ...you know better

karan.1970 · Oct 8, 2014

A1Kaid said:
Most of Kargil high points are still under Pakistani control to this today. Indians were slaughtered in the hundreds, you Indians have lied about your battle records in Kargil per se your own military commanders in Kargil. Using inflated enemy casualty numbers, false encounters, etc.

Zabaniyah · Oct 17, 2014

Looks good, but seems a little heavy.

ni8mare · Oct 17, 2014

Loki said:
Looks good, but seems a little heavy.

without magazine <3.3 kg
with magazine <4 kg
seem alright

IND151 · Oct 18, 2014

A1Kaid said:
Most of Kargil high points are still under Pakistani control to this today. Indians were slaughtered in the hundreds, you Indians have lied about your battle records in Kargil per se your own military commanders in Kargil. Using inflated enemy casualty numbers, false encounters, etc.

Which ones, 'Sire'?

Omega007 · Aug 27, 2015

CallofDuty2 said:
oh yeah you dont have any answers to the question.

What was your question again??Cause I do not see anything in interrogative terms in that post I relied to!!So again,go back and finish your elementary school before coming here and defecating everywhere with your filthy mouth.

CallofDuty2 said:
and m cod 2 not that old cod.

Grow some ballz,will ya,little piece of chicken shit??!!You say you are not the same guy,yet you forgot to change your writing style,or the total lack of it.........it's a dead give away you know,piece of crap.

oh... @waz ,@Oscar please help @Omega007 . :omghaha:

Stop laughing you piece of crap.It's you who needs the help chicken shit,that's why I called the 'docs',to fix your *** up,you moron.

CallofDuty2 said:
and i will take caution.i have my rights in PDF.

Sorry,but brain dead imbeciles of your caliber do not have any rights.

CallofDuty2 said:
as long as i not go against the rules, no ban.sorry man.

Yeah yeah,just like the first time,right.........................you little chihuahua??

Not So Good · Aug 27, 2015

Omega007 said:
Callofbooty returns!!Along with his usual bullshit of course. @waz , @Oscar please take care of this little thing.

Omega007 · Aug 27, 2015

CallofDuty2 said:
calm down brother, my q is why not advanced weapons.

And how do you know the MCIWS is not advanced??Have you fired it or talked with the developers??Do you know about its operation mechanisms??Do you have some insider information that we mortals are not privy to,sire??If it is so,then stop beating around the bush and come clean with your findings.Or else,just keep shut,watch and learn.
And yeah,one more thing - you didn't ask any question.You stated your opinion.You know what's the shit with opinions??It's like asshole,everyone and his mother has got one,doesn't mean we have entertain each and every one of those.But right now,I'm finding you to be quite entertaining.So carry on,entertain me some more.............SLAVE!!

CallofDuty2 said:
grow some ballz that means you have ten balls.

As I said before and I say it again,you lack even the basic most,elementary level education!!Go get a proper schooling first,or you could ask your mum,that will work too I guess.

CallofDuty2 said:
and you know me well

Not well but enough.

CallofDuty2 said:
i have given a very good impact on u all.

Not very good,rather a stupid impression.

CallofDuty2 said:
F u man, smell some a$$.

Oh,so you want me to say that when you are pissed,as you are right now (judging by this swearing),you smell *** to vent your steam??!!Wow!!Are you gay??

Arsalan · Aug 27, 2015

Good, so INSAS was not deemed suitable for Indian Army or is it that this new super gun is super advanced so that it will replace the older ones? Have not read much about this new weapon system but whatever i have read about it, it sure looks good.

ALSO, please mind you language while posting in the threads, swearing and foul language wont get you anywhere, specially @Omega007 @CallofDuty2 . If you have any differences, better to settle them in a civilized manner. You can present some facts/links to support your argument and that will be much better then calling names.

Search

DRDO's New Multi-caliber weapon system to replace INSAS

Zarvan

ELITE MEMBER

A1Kaid

PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST

karan.1970

BANNED

GORKHALI

SENIOR MEMBER

A1Kaid

PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST

A1Kaid

PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST

Rahul1563

FULL MEMBER

karan.1970

BANNED

Zabaniyah

ELITE MEMBER

ni8mare

SENIOR MEMBER

IND151

BANNED

Omega007

BANNED

Not So Good

BANNED

Omega007

BANNED

Arsalan

THINK TANK CHAIRMAN

Similar threads

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Military Forum Latest Posts