What's new

Our soldiers became the 'Mukti Bahini' | Former Indian Army Chief, General V.K Singh's book reveals.

india supported terrorists in 1971 infact indians were the terrorists , nothing new in that but its good that the confrimation has come from the mouth of the head donkey himself

So that mean Bangladesh a Muslim majority country choose terrorist to save themselves from Pakistani angels????
 
Title of this thread should be changed to 'Indian Army Chief admits terrorism charges from 1971'
Except that 'Mukti' means freedom, not terrorism. Your inability to understand the Bengali language and culture, and trying to impose your own language and culture and hegemony on them was the very reason for 1971. Religion is not a unifying factor, as you had been misled to believe.

We trained and armed and commanded the freedom fighters, and guess what - they won their freedom, they became a sovereign nation that is not today known as the hub of terrorism. That's the difference between true freedom fighting and terrorism.
 
This was nothing knew to be honest...if someone reads the book by Qutubuddin Aziz 'Blood and Tears' or just look at Indira Gandhi's statements of that time everyone already had figured it out back more than 30 years ago the only thing remaining here is that why are the Indians so flamboyantly admitting it after so many years? The only logical answer is that Pakistanis like myself who were born in the late 80's are to be readied for this war and idiocy brought on by the earlier generations of us Pakistanis...if you "elder" Pakistanis are reading this message then hear me WELL, this war that is going to happen is a mess created by YOU! Me and all the people who are like me BLAME YOU AND ONLY YOU for letting that tragedy happen...but whatever, may Allah forgive our sins and as well as yours....

It is time for the newer generation to take the mantle of leadership and dismember India once and for all, the demon touched Modi will not rest until he becomes the Hitler of Asia...and we will not rest until we repeat the history of our ancestors (Prophet Muhammad (SAW)) and conquer you and rule you for another 5000 years....
Are you planing to do this on a flying horse?
Just mail me before you start, my son always wanted to see one. :)
 
No need for name calling, refute his rhetoric with structured post. I will negatively rate personal attacks...
When can Calling someone Mulla Ji comes as a Personal Attack? If this is so, why not you -ve rate all who used the name Yindoo, Baniya, Basanti..etc etc.

BTW, we used to say Mulla ji to many of our Muslim Friends..& its not a bad word...
Also, Aeronaut might have liked it too...:yahoo:
 
Thekedar of Islam syndrome :lol:
And you have the idiot syndrome please shut up when you don't know what you're talking about

Are you planing to do this on a flying horse?
Just mail me before you start, my son always wanted to see one. :)
No you Indiot I plan to do it by spreading you in a beam of light from outer space, do you know what is it called? Of course not because your primitive mind cannot grasp the concept of a particle canon.

Lol...everytime you try, you endup like this. :rofl:
anigif_enhanced-buzz-2352-1336139745-11.gif
lol you're a very amusing joker
 
No you Indiot I plan to do it by spreading you in a beam of light from outer space, do you know what is it called? Of course not because your primitive mind cannot grasp the concept of a particle canon.
Another dumb keyboard warrior. :omghaha:
 
India has always torn a page off the Pak book and done a better job of it.

Some instances :

Taking a cue from sending troops into J&K in 47 -48 a misinformed Ayub tried Gibraltar ( & promoted himself to FM after that !) and goofed it, India did a BD.

Pak tried to create a ' BD' in Khalistan - and failed. Punjab is intact.

India shafted Pak aspirations in Siachen by getting there first & stayed there.

Pak tried a Kargil to undo Siachen & had to withdraw.

India has always torn a page off the Pak book and done a better job of it.

Some instances :

Taking a cue from sending troops into J&K in 47 -48 a misinformed Ayub tried Gibraltar ( & promoted himself to FM after that !) and goofed it, India did a BD.

Pak tried to create a ' BD' in Khalistan - and failed. Punjab is intact.

India shafted Pak aspirations in Siachen by getting there first & stayed there.

Pak tried a Kargil to undo Siachen & had to withdraw.

Facts remain:

1. In 1947-48 Pakistan captured all of the Gilgit Baltistan and 1/3rd of Kashmir, getting access to China and blocking India's access to Middle East, Central Asia and Russian. India still keeps half a million of its security forces in Kashmir, a very heavy toll on India's coffers.

2. In 1965, India attacked Pakistan first on Lahore front - Operation Gibraltar was not beyond an international border, it was only across the cease-fire line - and again it was India which ran to UN first to beg for a cease-fire.

3. BD was something that was bound to happen due to geographic barriers, but against the dreams and wishes of Greater India BD could not be coerced to annex itself to India.

4. Siachen was a strategic mistake, Indian have not been able to get anything out of it, instead, they have to spend a lot more than Pakistan just to maintain their positions there.

5. Pakisan gave a big surprise to India in Kargil and is still in control of Tiger Hill (Point 5353), and that means the strategic Srinagar-Leh Highway is in the direct line of fire of Pakistani artillery. The alternative route is open hardly two months of the year.
 
Facts remain:

1. In 1947-48 Pakistan captured all of the Gilgit Baltistan and 1/3rd of Kashmir, getting access to China and blocking India's access to Middle East, Central Asia and Russian. India still keeps half a million of its security forces in Kashmir, a very heavy toll on India's coffers.

2. In 1965, India attacked Pakistan first on Lahore front - Operation Gibraltar was not beyond an international border, it was only across the cease-fire line - and again it was India which ran to UN first to beg for a cease-fire.

3. BD was something that was bound to happen due to geographic barriers, but against the dreams and wishes of Greater India BD could not be coerced to annex itself to India.

4. Siachen was a strategic mistake, Indian have not been able to get anything out of it, instead, they have to spend a lot more than Pakistan just to maintain their positions there.

5. Pakisan gave a big surprise to India in Kargil and is still in control of Tiger Hill (Point 5353), and that means the strategic Srinagar-Leh Highway is in the direct line of fire of Pakistani artillery. The alternative route is open hardly two months of the year.

Why are your facts tinged with fiction though? :pop:
 

Back
Top Bottom