What's new

India threatens to derail WTO deal, prompts angry U.S. rebuke

Daedalus

BANNED
Joined
Aug 8, 2012
Messages
842
Reaction score
2
Country
India
Location
China
India will not allow Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA), which was agreed upon in the World Trade Organisation (WTO) ministerial at Bali in December 13. The TFA has to be implemented by the end of this month.

The BJP-led NDA government says that the UPA did not hold ground and made India’s agricultural subsidy regime vulnerable and that until guarantees are ensured on this count, there is no question of going ahead with TFA.

A senior governmental source explained that with the developed countries like the US and the EU giving billions in farm subsidies and their failure to scale them down as agreed upon, it would be unreasonable to object to the minimum support price (MSP) that the Indian government offers to farmers is “distorting” market prices.

The BJP is also of the view that then Union commerce minister Anand Sharma had yielded ground too easily and it compromised India’s farm interest.

This will be the first major break between NDA-2 and UPA-2. When the UPA came to power in 2004, the Manmohan Singh government stuck to the position taken by the earlier NDA government of Atal Bihari Vajpayee. DMK’s Murasoli Maran, who was the commerce minister then had stood his ground in what had come to be known as the Doha development round and refused to allow issues related to agriculture to be brought on the WTO agenda.

The Bali agreement gave India time till 2017 to continue with its food security policies in exchange for TFA to be implemented. India feels that once TFA is gone through, the issue of agricultural subsidies will be brought up again. Therefore India wants to use the TFA as a bargaining counter.

Interestingly, it is not just the developed countries like the US which had objected to India’s food subsidies at Bali but also other developing and rice-exporting countries like Thailand, Pakistan and Uruguay.

The Bali agreement which was clinched after tough negotiations which went into an extra day was seen then as a breakthrough after the Doha deadlock. The TFA is seen as the right move to boost global trade by making customs operations at airports and ports simplified and efficient.

India threatens to derail WTO deal, prompts angry U.S. rebuke| Reuters

Narendra Modi government to backtrack on India’s WTO commitment, not allow Trade Facilitation Agreement | Latest News & Updates at Daily News & Analysis
 
everyone knows the Doha Round failed and will continue to fail since agricultural issues like subsidies will always linger
 
While I understand India's view on this, if it abrogates its trade commitments, who will trust India to implement other trade deals?

I agree. This will reduce investor confidence in India's ability to maintain trade deals. In fact there are some issues with India's taxation regime towards foreign businesses that have caused quite a concern.

The Indian Legation need to remember the 1950s and 1960s Food Grain Crisis, due to total dependence on domestic provisions, coupled with absentee landlordism and poor agricultural output.

Tho India has benefited form liberal policy in green revolution , her achilles heel is the food provisions for her population. Failing to uphold her duties will not only have political ramifications, but also international investors' confidence in India.
 
I agree. This will reduce investor confidence in India's ability to maintain trade deals. In fact there are some issues with India's taxation regime towards foreign businesses that have caused quite a concern.

The Indian Legation need to remember the 1950s and 1960s Food Grain Crisis, due to total dependence on domestic provisions, coupled with absentee landlordism and poor agricultural output.

Tho India has benefited form liberal policy in green revolution , her achilles heel is the food provisions for her population. Failing to uphold her duties will not only have political ramifications, but also international investors' confidence in India.

Agreed. The main threat facing India's agricultural industry is low productivity, not foreign subsidies. If India tackles the productivity issue, not only will it be able to provide for its own population, it will become an exporting powerhouse. I have been rather disappointed at Modi's less than proactive stance on this given his energetic and effective governance of Gujarat, but it's early days yet. The first budget was a bad sign, but confidence can be restored with bold action from now on.
 
While I understand India's view on this, if it abrogates its trade commitments, who will trust India to implement other trade deals?

India is not abrogating any of its trade commitments.

It is only refusing to agree to any more terms until its concerns are addressed.

A most reasonable position, so there is no case for anyone not to trust India.

I agree. This will reduce investor confidence in India's ability to maintain trade deals. In fact there are some issues with India's taxation regime towards foreign businesses that have caused quite a concern.

The Indian Legation need to remember the 1950s and 1960s Food Grain Crisis, due to total dependence on domestic provisions, coupled with absentee landlordism and poor agricultural output.

Tho India has benefited form liberal policy in green revolution , her achilles heel is the food provisions for her population. Failing to uphold her duties will not only have political ramifications, but also international investors' confidence in India.

LOL. It has nothing to do with reducing investor confidence.

Kindly highlight areas where India has high taxation towards foreign business.

Since India ranks 65 out of 79 in the Global Hunger Index, it is safe to say India has NOT benefited from liberal policy in green revolution.

Indian govt. commitment to the people of India is FAR more important that its concerns about international investors.

Agreed. The main threat facing India's agricultural industry is low productivity, not foreign subsidies. If India tackles the productivity issue, not only will it be able to provide for its own population, it will become an exporting powerhouse. I have been rather disappointed at Modi's less than proactive stance on this given his energetic and effective governance of Gujarat, but it's early days yet. The first budget was a bad sign, but confidence can be restored with bold action from now on.

The issue is NOT threat to Indian agriculture.

The Issue is threat to India's food security.

Since 90% of Indian agriculture is depended on the monsoon and not irrigation, the threat is NEVER going to be mitigated unless 100% of agriculture is transformed into irrigated fields.

So the WTO can either fund India the 1 trillion $ it needs to completely irrigate the whole of India or it can STFU.
 
Last edited:
Agreed. The main threat facing India's agricultural industry is low productivity, not foreign subsidies. If India tackles the productivity issue, not only will it be able to provide for its own population, it will become an exporting powerhouse. I have been rather disappointed at Modi's less than proactive stance on this given his energetic and effective governance of Gujarat, but it's early days yet. The first budget was a bad sign, but confidence can be restored with bold action from now on.

Modern agriculture depends on a whole chain of industries. To start with, you need biochemical industry for seed treatment, you need transportation industry for distribution, you need automotive industry for manufacturing farming vehicle, you need metal industry for creating farming tools and parts, you need dams and reservoirs to maintain water supply, you need chemical industry to make fertilizers, you need petroleum industry to fuel the vehicles and make the raw material for chemical and biochemical industry. The list goes on and on.

India does face a low productivity problem in agriculture industry, but fixing it requires building a gigantic chain of industry and decades of effort. I am not saying it can't be done, but it certainly won't be quick, easy or cheap.
 
India is not abrogating any of its trade commitments.

It is only refusing to agree to any more terms until its concerns are addressed.

A most reasonable position, so there is no case for anyone not to trust India.



LOL. It has nothing to do with reducing investor confidence.

Kindly highlight areas where India has high taxation towards foreign business.

Since India ranks 65 out of 79 in the Global Hunger Index, it is safe to say India has NOT benefited from liberal policy in green revolution.

Indian govt. commitment to the people of India is FAR more important that its concerns about international investors.



The issue is NOT threat to Indian agriculture.

The Issue is threat to India's food security.

Since 90% of Indian agriculture is depended on the monsoon and not irrigation, the threat is NEVER going to be mitigated unless 100% of agriculture is transformed into irrigated fields.

So the WTO can either fund India the 1 trillion $ it needs to completely irrigate the whole of India or it can STFU.

No, the article states that India will not honor the previous government's commitments to the TFA under the WTO. That means it is abrogating its agreement.

What does this have to do with food security? This has to do with food subsidies. If anything, the monsoon issue makes cheap imports even more necessary.
 
No, the article states that India will not honor the previous government's commitments to the TFA under the WTO. That means it is abrogating its agreement.

What does this have to do with food security? This has to do with food subsidies. If anything, the monsoon issue makes cheap imports even more necessary.

Well said.

Kindly highlight areas where India has high taxation towards foreign business.

George Osborne says Indian tax plans could harm investment - Telegraph

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/07/b...as-foreign-investors.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

http://www.nftc.org/default/tax/Representative Press.pdf

Japan writes to India on problems faced by its companies here | Business Line
 
No, the article states that India will not honor the previous government's commitments to the TFA under the WTO. That means it is abrogating its agreement.

What does this have to do with food security? This has to do with food subsidies. If anything, the monsoon issue makes cheap imports even more necessary.

The article is misleading and my guess is that it is suppose to mislead.

India's proposal has received unanimous support from the G33 nations.

The real issue that is holding up trade is the Minimum Guarantee Price that India offers its farmers to ensure that they can remain as farmers.

The reality is that the cost of farming in India is so high that most people do not find farming a profitable or sustainable activity.

however in the absence of farmers India will either Starve or become slave to western powers by importing food from abroad and subsequent be susceptible to Blackmail that will endanger food security of the majority of 1.2 billion population.


The Indian govt. under Modi has called these earlier retrospective Taxes as Tax Terrorism. That should indicate how strongly the present govt. feels about this particular unfair practice that was imposed in-spite of the Supreme court ruling against them.

Modi is committed to removing this. So this is a non issue as of today.
 
The reality is that the cost of farming in India is so high that most people do not find farming a profitable or sustainable activity.

All the more to emphasize upon foreign imports.


Modi is committed to removing this. So this is a non issue as of today.

Until Modi changes this, it will remain an issue. In fact, it dissuades foreign investors to India, for say ASEAN and Bangladesh.
 
All the more to emphasize upon foreign imports.




Until Modi changes this, it will remain an issue. In fact, it dissuades foreign investors to India, for say ASEAN and Bangladesh.

That is because fertilizers which are derived from petroleum are becoming costly due to rising oil prices.
 
India will not allow Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA), which was agreed upon in the World Trade Organisation (WTO) ministerial at Bali in December 13. The TFA has to be implemented by the end of this month.

The BJP-led NDA government says that the UPA did not hold ground and made India’s agricultural subsidy regime vulnerable and that until guarantees are ensured on this count, there is no question of going ahead with TFA.

A senior governmental source explained that with the developed countries like the US and the EU giving billions in farm subsidies and their failure to scale them down as agreed upon, it would be unreasonable to object to the minimum support price (MSP) that the Indian government offers to farmers is “distorting” market prices.

The BJP is also of the view that then Union commerce minister Anand Sharma had yielded ground too easily and it compromised India’s farm interest.

This will be the first major break between NDA-2 and UPA-2. When the UPA came to power in 2004, the Manmohan Singh government stuck to the position taken by the earlier NDA government of Atal Bihari Vajpayee. DMK’s Murasoli Maran, who was the commerce minister then had stood his ground in what had come to be known as the Doha development round and refused to allow issues related to agriculture to be brought on the WTO agenda.

The Bali agreement gave India time till 2017 to continue with its food security policies in exchange for TFA to be implemented. India feels that once TFA is gone through, the issue of agricultural subsidies will be brought up again. Therefore India wants to use the TFA as a bargaining counter.

Interestingly, it is not just the developed countries like the US which had objected to India’s food subsidies at Bali but also other developing and rice-exporting countries like Thailand, Pakistan and Uruguay.

The Bali agreement which was clinched after tough negotiations which went into an extra day was seen then as a breakthrough after the Doha deadlock. The TFA is seen as the right move to boost global trade by making customs operations at airports and ports simplified and efficient.

India threatens to derail WTO deal, prompts angry U.S. rebuke| Reuters

Narendra Modi government to backtrack on India’s WTO commitment, not allow Trade Facilitation Agreement | Latest News & Updates at Daily News & Analysis


This is to all Idiods who chants that BJP follows congress strategy.
 

Back
Top Bottom