What's new

India’s Nuclear Weapons Exceed 200: Exacerbates Asian Nuclear Quagmire

Vaise I like ur name; mera Fav. serial tha............Raven (U.S. TV series) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ya that was good ... although my profile name is derived from this :)

Night Raven - G.I. Joe Wiki - Joepedia - GI Joe, Cobra, toys

raven_art.jpg
 
I suspect India already has more nuclear weapons than pakistan as well as more advanced nuclear technology. Comparing their nuclear potential, I come to this conclusion.

However, it is pakistan's nukes which gets international attention and are exaggerated in the media for obvious reasons. India prefers to stay in the sideline.
 
India already has an operational Ballistic missile defence rite ?
 
Do, even you, have any idea what you are saying??:cheesy:
*You mention a 7000 kms cruise missile, which does not exist.......
*Falsely state that nuke sub lease is a violation of NPT( yes this is the proper name)
*you mention sea based nuke mines, which as to the extent of my knowledge are not in Indian possesion and haven't been invented either......:disagree:
Kuchh research kar liya karo.......:lol: The web is free

Supply of military related nuclear platforms for offensive purposes is a violation of non-proliferation regimes, NPT being one of them.

Nuclear sea mines are a reality. If I may - let me update your research, sir:
The U.S. Navy once had nuclear torpedoes and mines, as did the Soviet navy, and China’s military also has discussed the use of nuclear torpedoes in its military writings as recently as 2006.
Report: North Korea Developing Nuclear Sea Mines | USNI Blog

India already has an operational Ballistic missile defence rite ?

Ballistic Missile Defence and India - wow - If I have to believe what DRDO says? I'll just say this much ......

If Aunty had balls she would have been an uncle :)
 
the newz is from "Quagmire" ?
the pervert of that cartoon family guy?
 
Don't have to believe DRDO.The tests are on video.Plus s-300 systems.Back to topic the numbers of nukes are irrelevant really.100 are enough to ruin the earth permanently with its aftereffects.
 
Don't have to believe DRDO.The tests are on video.Plus s-300 systems.Back to topic the numbers of nukes are irrelevant really.100 are enough to ruin the earth permanently with its aftereffects.

Please quote source about Indian acquisition of S-300. India does not have this weapon system. Even if it does, it'll need hundreds os such systems if not thousands to safeguard all major cities and critical assets.

The earth will not be ruined by 100 nuclear weapons - relax.

Pakistan's first strike against India should target atleast 400 major Indian cities. This is the only way to deter chauvenistic Indian generals who are advising Indian government to call Pakistan's nuclear bluff.
 
Even if India is getting th NATO named Akula, this sub can also launch 6000-7000 kilometer range cruise missiles. However, the attack sub NATO named Akula is far more dangerous for Pakistan than the ballistic missile Russian named Akula. The fact that Russians are giving you these nuke subs is a big violation of non-proliferation regimes. Pak Navy needs to prepare itself against such offensive Indian nuclear platforms and need sea based nuclear mines to counter these subs.

Are bhai, India has already inducted INS Chakra, see the photo below

6.JPG


Tell me how do you think this, INS Chakra, can fire a Ballistic Missile?
 
Are bhai, India has already inducted INS Chakra, see the photo below

6.JPG


Tell me how do you think this, INS Chakra, can fire a Ballistic Missile?

Arrey Bhai tareekh parh lo. Saal pehlay ke comments ko saal baad utha liya. :)
 

Back
Top Bottom