What's new

How can Pakistan counter India’s ABM system?

The Indian ABM is a cash pit aimed to help corrupt people stockpile money. Pakistan needs to ignore it.

Such a DELUSION had and have been costing you dearly.... Its better to open the eyes and see the reality... those Scud and M11 variants are just shooting practice of all the current ABM systems available.... Its such a pity that even SAM systems like S-300 have the capability to intercept them and bring them down easily...
 
If you see the Modern day WAR.

No country is invading directly... it is guiding its won people against the government and then troppling the government.
You can make your clown as the head of that country.

Recent Example: Afghanistan, Iraq, Egypt etc.

If India want it can create civil war between Shia and Sunni and armed the shia.
If India want it can create civil war between Baloch and others and arm the baloch groups.
If India want it can create civil war between Tribals
Open the DAMS and flood half of Pakistan
Block the Sea

That will be enough for Pak Army.... no need to go in all out WAR.
Lolzz. Here comes the genius. What an epic war plan. :rofl:

---------- Post added at 12:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:48 PM ----------

The Indian ABM is a cash pit aimed to help corrupt people stockpile money. Pakistan needs to ignore it.

Hahaha. You nailed it Asim. Never underestimate the enemy but then why overestimate them. ;)
 
The Indian ABM is a cash pit aimed to help corrupt people stockpile money. Pakistan needs to ignore it.

If ABM are just cash pit then Pakistan should ignore everything and wait and watch :). But Once Multiple layer of ABM and SAM will be in place, Pakistan corrupt people will start mass production or import of Missiles.

Once Pakistan will have enough number of Missiles. We will increase the No. of ABM system many times more. So Corruption will continue forever. :)
 
no need for Indians to get excited over the BMD...it is a far-fetched plan...

By 2014,only Delhi will be protected by AAD/PAD...

Why do Indians ignore that Pakistan will also develop its missile technology further?
 
For every action there is reaction.! @ Cold Start > < NASR being a small example.

Without chest thumping, let's be realistic,..... Pakistan tests HATF-1 back in early 80s, India sidelines it as a mere firecracker....yet later in the years, it's India which felt the need for an ABM system.

Unlike say, US/Russia or US/China, India/Pakistan share a common border which if I am not wrong, extends out to the Sea as well. Where as a launch from Russia gave the Americans some 15 minutes reaction time, between the subjects, it's almost blink of an eye. I have little knowledge in this field, but a three prone attack involving some sophisticated delivery systems would need some heavy duty ABM systems in place..... just my 2 cents.

Its silly that you consider an unoperational Quasi-BM as an answer to the rapid thrust of 3 Mechanized Divisions well supported by AF and Navy......

The current ABM is just a building block or 1st step towards a bigger threat.... i.e. China....

These ABM systems are manual aswell as automatic... and functions spontaneously on the detection of any threat.... what you don't realize is the advantage the close distance offers.... making any launch detectable in boost phase only and intercepting it right there in the most vulnerable stage aswell... hence not allowing any such missile enter the space in 1st place.... Remember Swordfish latest variant can detect and track targets as small as a cricket ball at 1500km.... Not to mention a secret Radar project which would operate in X-band and have capability to detect a Football size target at 4000km aswell.... Besides satellite detection... Very less window remains there for any Pakistani BM to enter space.... hence BM is not the option after 2020.... Its =Fail in the scenario you have mentioned.
 
US offered Patriot System, Russia Offered S-400/500 (we already have S-300). We can also buy Arrow-3 if needed. But I don't think, we will need. Our ABM 1,500-2,000 KM AAD & PDV and 5,000 KM AD-1,2 will be deployed in 2014 and 2016-17 respectively. If By chance, Our ABM fails (which is negligible as all are on schedule since 2004) still we can Buy Any of the best 3 ABM. So, Our ABM will be reality and we will be in Top 4 best by 2017. US will provide ABM for Europe. China ABM will come in 2020 as per news. China has to develop because they don't have 2nd Option.
 
2.Another way is Multiple Kill Vehicle (MKV) developed by US

The latest trick the U.S. Missile Defense Agency (MDA) would like to field is the Multiple Kill Vehicle (MKV), an ABM with lots of smaller-sized kill vehicles on board. Lockheed Martin is currently developing the MKV to fit into the same space that Raytheon's hit-to-kill vehicle takes up on the U.S. Ground-Based Interceptor being deployed in Alaska this year. The MKV would work a lot like a MIRV It would have a "bus" that would hold dozens of coffee-can-sized kill vehicles and a long-range infrared sensor to spot an approaching cluster of objects such as a bunch of MIRVs and decoys. The bus would assign each kill vehicle a target and provide in-flight targeting updates. With dozens of smaller vehicles, every probable target in an inbound missile attack could be hit, including warheads, decoys, and junk parts that simply look threatening.

MDA would first use MKVs to complement existing single-shot kill vehicles and ultimately replace them. The MKV design is scalable, so it could be incorporated on smaller systems such THAAD using fewer kill vehicles. Even providing a smaller system such as THAAD or the Navy's Standard Missile with a couple of smaller kill vehicles would be beneficial. Flight tests are expected around 2010. – Doug Mohney.


Strategic Nukes: MIRV and Counter-MIRV [Archive] - Military Photos

The Multiple-Kill Vehicle project has been dropped,owing to the high costs and impractical design...It was aimed at China and Russia.

Since MKV will fail to protect US mainland from any Chinese/Russian attack,so it is useless to waste money on it,According to the latest report on BMD by US Department of Defence.

Instead,US aims to co-operate with Russia and possibly China to share information and detection structure on Ballistic Missile Threat from states like Iran and North Korea.

Practically,the BMD of USA is against Iran and North Korea only.Against Russia/China,MAD is the deterrent.
 
no need for Indians to get excited over the BMD...it is a far-fetched plan...

By 2014,only Delhi will be protected by AAD/PAD...

Why do Indians ignore that Pakistan will also develop its missile technology further?

ABM is not point missile but range. AAD/PDV will cover 1,500-2,000 KM 360 degree so 3,000-4,000KM. So, Kashmir to Mumbai if deployed at Delhi. (Delhi will be centre of 3,000-4,000 KM border of Pakistan)

Also PDV will replace PAD in 2014.
 
no need for Indians to get excited over the BMD...it is a far-fetched plan...

By 2014,only Delhi will be protected by AAD/PAD...

Why do Indians ignore that Pakistan will also develop its missile technology further?

Yes but after the rapid thrust during 1998-2004 period we are yet to see any considerable development.... Nasr etc.... are just for public amusement and propaganda to give them assurance... they hold a little to no significance against the current Indian Missile programs.... which are being tested almost every month.
 
Yes but after the rapid thrust during 1998-2004 period we are yet to see any considerable development.... Nasr etc.... are just for public amusement and propaganda to give them assurance... they hold a little to no significance against the current Indian Missile programs.... which are being tested almost every month.

Systems like Nasr,Babur are adding diversity to our Strategic program...the more diverse it is,the harder will be to stop all of it...

BTW,which ABM system (in Indian possession) can intercept Nasr?
 
The Multiple-Kill Vehicle project has been dropped,owing to the high costs and impractical design...It was aimed at China and Russia.

Since MKV will fail to protect US mainland from any Chinese/Russian attack,so it is useless to waste money on it,According to the latest report on BMD by US Department of Defence.

Instead,US aims to co-operate with Russia and possibly China to share information and detection structure on Ballistic Missile Threat from states like Iran and North Korea.

Practically,the BMD of USA is against Iran and North Korea only.Against Russia/China,MAD is the deterrent.

Don't Include China here..... the BMD of US is capable enough to take care of a a couple of hundred of ICBMs which China would possibly launch against it.... Russia was and continues to be the main threat here since it has 1000s of BMs in ready to launch positions.
 
Pakistan will go for MIRVs soon, probably a decade later or so , India will come up with a system close to being as capable as THAAD.
 
Systems like Nasr,Babur are adding diversity to our Strategic program...the more diverse it is,the harder will be to stop all of it...

BTW,which ABM system (in Indian possession) can intercept Nasr?

ASHWIN is the best candidate here.... as it is designed to intercept targets in terminal phase.... If it can intercept a ballistic missile in terminal phase as demonstrated it can surely intercept a quasi-Ballistic one.... and since Nasr would rise upto 50-60km in atmosphere.... it would allow a fair chance to get detected..... besides there are several point defense systems which would come in handy.
 

Back
Top Bottom