What's new

‘India to send 150,000 troops for anti-Pakistan operations’

Neo

RETIRED

New Recruit

Joined
Nov 1, 2005
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Tuesday, October 07, 2008

LAHORE: Jamaat-ud-Dawah (JD), Pakistan Ameer Prof Hafiz Muhammad Saeed has alleged that India would send its 150,000 troops to Afghanistan for launching fresh anti-Pakistan operations as part of the latest US-India deal.

Deployment of the Indian troops in Afghanistan was made at American insistence after which the US-India nuclear deal finally went through, he said while speaking to heads of different JD departments on Monday.

In return, he said, Washington had agreed to the Indian demand of American military assistance to crush the freedom movement in occupied Kashmir. He said it was a strong wake-up call for those trying to freeze the Kashmir issue and promote friendly relations with Delhi, and urged Pakistani rulers not to remain silent at a time when America, Israel, and India had joined their forces to destroy Pakistan's defence.

He said America was Pakistan's enemy in disguise and would continue missile strikes in the tribal areas unless given a strong and courageous reaction. He said the rulers in Islamabad must end their servile attitude towards Washington and strengthen relations with Muslim countries and China.
 
figere is wrong i think this kind of people also not good sorce
 
Is it the same LET guy?

He seems to know something no one else know.
 
In other words, America is throwing their war on India since they have lost public support for it. And wouldnt American involvement in Kashmir just throw a spotlight on what is really happening in Kashmir?
 
it's a fake report. a few thousand at the most to protect indian workers and engineer's from kidnappers and nothing more. no conspiracy here. india has it's own problems.
 
Great. So people are believing this report!

This LET guy seems to command some following here.
 
If i am not mistaken, in the nuclear deal with US, there was clause that India would give military assistance if US required. Maybe after the deal, India sending of 150,000 troops to afganistan is in play here. Since just two days ago Bush asked for more troops to be deployed in Afganistan.
 
the clauses mentioned india to assist america in there war against terrorism. there was nothing concrete in it to suggest india would have to forcefully send troops. the only strong language it has in there is on iran. other than that it's nothing much.
 
If i am not mistaken, in the nuclear deal with US, there was clause that India would give military assistance if US required. Maybe after the deal, India sending of 150,000 troops to afganistan is in play here. Since just two days ago Bush asked for more troops to be deployed in Afganistan.

Countries "pulling out" of war zones and India "getting into" war zones. :crazy:

What about some troop deployment in Iraq as well?
 
If I was an Indian I would be thinking this is madness. But since I am a Pakistani I'm like; if this is true...cant wait for the tribes to remind the world why these mountains are called Hindu Kush (Hindu Killers):devil: Some memories of Sri Lanka coming back too.

Lets see.:pop:
 
If I was an Indian I would be thinking this is madness. But since I am a Pakistani I'm like; if this is true...cant wait for the tribes to remind the world why these mountains are called Hindu Kush (Hindu Killers):devil: Some memories of Sri Lanka coming back too.

Lets see.:pop:

It was not the Indians from the plains who were murdered in that great genocide.

It must be the people of the same tribes who were native to the land.

Well at least you accepted the reality of the peaceful and tolerant part.
 

Back
Top Bottom